Collection, evaluation and phenotypic diversity assessment of maize (Zea mays) germplasm from North Eastern Himalayan region


579 / 241

Authors

  • JYOTI KUMARI ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012
  • ASHOK KUMAR ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012
  • T P SINGH ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012
  • K C BHATT ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012
  • A K MISHRA ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012
  • D P SEMWAL ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012
  • R K SHARMA ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012
  • J C RANA ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i6.70929

Keywords:

Biplot, Characterization, Clustering, Descriptors, Landraces, Maize, North Himalayan Region, Principal Component Analysis

Abstract

Primitive landraces and traditional cultivars of maize (Zea mays L.) are invaluable resources for the humankind. These need to be collected, evaluated, conserved and utilized for increasing agricultural production and quality enhancement. Based on extensive survey, 75 diverse maize accessions were collected from Nagaland and Manipur states of the North Eastern Himalayan region. These collections were evaluated under two different agro-ecological regions, New Delhi and Shillong during kharif 2012 and 2013 using 12 quantitative variables. There was significant morphological variability among the accessions. Trait specific cultivars were identified based on exploration related knowledge and phenotypic valuation. The cluster analysis was performed to assess the variation among genotypes and grouped them into five clusters based on phenotypic traits. The principal component analysis (PCA) was subjected to quantitative datasets to group the accessions and to study contribution of traits for phenotypic variation. The first two principal components explained more than 50% of the phenotypic variation. Plant height, ear height, grain yield, ear width, number of kernel rows and number of kernels per row were major contributing traits towards phenotypic diversity. The different groups obtained can be useful for deriving the inbred lines with diverse features and diversifying the heterotic pools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angelo M, Ccarvalho P, Gannanca J F T, Abreau I, Sousa N F, Santos T M M, Vieira M R C and Motto M. 2008. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 221–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9230-9

Bradolini A. 1970. Razze europee di mais. Maydica 15: 5–27. Dhawan N L. 1964. Primitive maize in Sikkim. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 38: 69–70.

FAOSTAT. 2014. Statistical database of the food and agriculture of the United Nations.

Gouesnard B, Dallard J, Panouillé A and Boyat A. 1997. Classification of French maize populations based on morphological traits. Agronomie17: 491–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19970906

Hugues A N, Akanvou L, Bi A Z and Kouakou C K. 2015. Phenotypic diversity of farmers traditional maize (Zea mays L.) varieties in Cote d’Ivorie. Maydica 60-M13.

ICAR-IIMR. 2015. Annual Report 2015-16, ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi, p 78.

Ilarslan R, Kaya Z, Kandemir I and Bretting P K. 2002. Genetic variability among Turkish pop, flint and dent corn (Zea mays L.) races: Morphological and agronomic traits. Euphytica 128: 173–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020896805265

Jaric J K, Prodanovic S, Iwarsson M and Minina A. 2010. Diversity of maize (Zea mays L.) landraces in eastern serbia: Morphological and storage protein characterization. Maydica 55: 231–8.

Kumar A, Kumari J, Rana J C, Chaudhary D P, Kumar R, Singh H, Singh T P and Dutta M. 2015. Diversity among maize landraces in North West Himalayan region of India assessed by agro-morphological and quality traits. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 75: 188–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2015.00029.2

Li Y. 1998. Development and germplasm base of maize hybrid in China. Maydica 43: 259–69.

Li Y, Shi Y S, Cao Y S and Wang T Y. 2002. A phenotypic diversity analysis of maize germplasm preserved in China. Maydica 47: 107–14.

Louette D and Smale M.2000. Farmers' seed selection practices and traditional maize varieties in Cuzalapa, Mexico.Euphytica 113: 25–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003941615886

Mahajan R K, Sapra R L, Srivastava U, Singh M and Sharma G D. 2000. Minimal descriptors for agri-horticultural crops. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, pp 22–5.

Mijangos-Cortés J O, Corona-Torres T, EspinosaVictoria D, Muñoz-Orozco A, Romero-Peñaloza J and Santacruz-Varela A. 2007. Differentiation among maize (Zea mays L.) landraces from the Tarasca Mountain Chain, Michoacan, Mexico and the Chalqueno complex. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 309–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-005-4775-y

Nass L L, Pellicano I T and Valois A C C. 1993. Utilization of genetic resources for maize and soybean breeding in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 16: 983–8.

Pradesh A, Maharashtra O, Pradesh M, Nadu T and Gujarat K . 2010. DIVA-GIS approaches for diversity assessment of pod characteristics in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Current Science 98: 616-9.

Prasanna B M and Sharma L. 2005. The landraces of maize (Zea mays L.) diversity and utility. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 18: 155–68.

Pressoir G and Berthaud J. 2004. Patterns of population structure in maize landraces from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca in Mexico. Heredity 92: 88–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800387

Rebourg C, Gouesnard B and Charcosset A. 2001. Large scale molecular analysis of traditional European maize population. Relationships with morphological variation. Heredity 86: 574–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00869.x

Singh B. 1977. Races of Maize in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi.

Singode A, Sekhar J C, Srinivasan K and Prasanna B M. 2009. Evaluation of yield performance of selected North East Himalayan (NEH) maize landrace accessions of India, outside their habitat. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 69(3): 191–8.

Stonor C R and Anderson E. 1949. Maize among hill people of Assam. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 36: 355 – 404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2394398

Tanksley S D and McCouch S R. 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1 063–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5329.1063

Wasala S K, Guleria S K, Sekhar J C, Mahajan V, Srinivasan K, Parsad R and Prasanna B M. 2013. Analysis of yield performance and genotype × environment effects on selected maize (Zea mays) landrace accessions of India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83: 287–93.

Wei K, Zhang H, Xu X, Du H, Huang Y and Zhang Z. 2009. Evaluation of phenotype and genetic diversity of maize landraces from Hubei province, South West China. Frontier Agriculture China 3(4): 374–82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-009-0075-1

Downloads

Submitted

2017-06-08

Published

2017-06-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMARI, J., KUMAR, A., SINGH, T. P., BHATT, K. C., MISHRA, A. K., SEMWAL, D. P., SHARMA, R. K., & RANA, J. C. (2017). Collection, evaluation and phenotypic diversity assessment of maize (Zea mays) germplasm from North Eastern Himalayan region. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(6), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i6.70929
Citation