Effect of crop residue and potassium management practices on productivity and economics of conservation agriculture based maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system


946 / 459

Authors

  • RAGHAVENDRA M ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • Y V SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • T K DAS ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • M C MEENA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i7.71761

Keywords:

Crop residue utilization, Economics, Potassium management, Potassium solubilising bacteria (KSB), Yield attributes, Zero tillage

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in kharif and rabi seasons of 2014-2016 at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi to study the effect of crop residue and potassium (K) on productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under conservation agriculture (CA) based maize-wheat cropping system. The experiment was conducted in split plot design with four levels of crop residue in main plot, viz. no crop residue (CR), 2.0 tonnes/ha CR, 4.0 tonnes/ha CR, 6.0 tonnes/ha CR and five potassium levels, viz. no K, 50% RDK, 100% RDK, 150% RDK, 50% RDK+KSB in sub-plots. Results revealed that the yield attributes, grain and stover/straw yield were significantly influenced by the crop residue and K management practices over the control in both crop during both the years. Treatment with 50% RDK+KSB showed the significantly highest values of all yield attributes like, number of grains/cob, grain weight/cob, test weight and grain (4.91, 5.39 tonnes/ha) and stover yield (8.41, 9.07 tonnes/ha) in maize. In wheat also number of spikes/m2, grains/spike, spike weight, test weight and yield (5.16, 5.45 tonnes/ha) and straw yield were significantly higher over the control and 50% RDK. However this treatment was at par with 100% RDK and 150% RDK. Among the residue management practices 4.0 tonnes/ha CR registered significantly higher yield attributes, grain yield and stover/straw yield over no crop residue and 2.0 tonnes/ha CR and it was on par with 6.0 tonnes/ha CR in maize and wheat crops. The highest cost of cultivation was reported in 150% RDK and lowest cost of cultivation, highest gross returns, net returns and B: C ratios in maize and wheat were recorded in 50% RDK+KSB. Among residue management practices no CR registered the highest net returns and these were on par with 2 tonnes/ha CR in both the years of maize. However, in wheat highest returns were reported with 4.0 tonnes/ha CR and this was statistically at par to all the residue management practices except no CR. In both the crops, no CR showed highest B: C ratio followed by 2.0 tonnes/ha CR and 4.0 tonnes/ha CR. Lowest B: C ratio was recorded with 6.0 tonnes/ha CR. The strong correlation was observed between different yield attributes and yield in both the crops. Thus, application of 4.0 tonnes/ha CR and 50% RDK+KSB was cost effective, eco-friendly and sustainable K management practices under CA based maize-wheat cropping system and this may be recommended to farmers for adaptation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arif M, Jan M T, Jamal M K, Saeed M, Iqbal M, Ziauddin Habib A, Shahenshah and Khan M Z. 2011. Effect of cropping system and residue management on maize. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43(2): 915–20.

Basak B B and Biswas D R. 2009. Influence of potassium solubilising microorganism (Bacillus mucilaginosus) and waste mica on potassium uptake dynamics by sudan grass (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) grown under two Alfisols. Plant Soil 317: 235–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9805-z

Basavesha K N, Savalgi V P, Sreenivasa M N and Manjunatha H. 2016. Impact of bacteria solubilizing both potassium and phosphorus on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Research in Environment and Life Sciences 9(4) 464–5.

FAO 2013. Conservation Agriculture. www.fao.org/ag/ca/index.html.

Ghosh P K, Das A, Saha R, Kharkrang E, Tripathi A K, Munda G C and Nagachan S V. 2010. Conservation agriculture towards achieving food security in north-east India. Current Science 99(7): 915–21.

Jat M L, Saharawat Y S and Gupta R. 2011. Conservation agriculture in cereal systems of South Asia: Nutrient management perspectives. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24: 100–5.

Jat N K, Kumar A and Dhar S. 2010. Influence of Sesbania green manure with or without wheat residues and N fertilization on maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 55(4): 253–8.

Karami A, Homaee M, Afzalinia S, Ruhipour H and Basirat S. 2012. Organic resource management: Impacts on soil aggregate stability and other soil physico-chemical properties. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 148: 22–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.021

Majumdar K, Kumar A, Shahi V and Satyanarayana T. Jat M L, Dalip K, Mirasol P, Naveen G, Singh V, Dwivedi B S, Meena M C, Singh V K, Kamboj B R, Sidhu H S and Adrian J. 2012. Economics of potassium fertiliser application in rice, wheat and maize grown in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Indian Journal of Fertilizer 8 (5): 44–53.

Moola Ram M R, Davari and Sharma S N. 2011. Effect of organic manure and biofertiliser on basmati (Oryza sativa L.) under organic farming of rice-wheat cropping system. International Journal of Agricultural and Crop Science 3(3): 76–84.

Muralikannan M. 1996. ‘Biodisolution of silicate, phosphate and potassium by silicate solubilizing bacteria in rice ecosystem’. M Sc (Agri.) thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Combatore.

Nourmohammadi G, Siaddat A and Kashani A. 2002. Cereal crops, p 46. Martyr Chamran University Press.

Polara K B, Sardhara R V, Parmar K B, Babariya N B and Patel K G. 2010. Effect of potassium on inflow rate of N, P, K, Ca, S, Fe, Zn and Mn at various growth stages of wheat. An Asian Journal of Soil Science 4(2): 228–35.

Prasad R, Ganagaiah B and Aipe K C. 1999. Effect of crop residue management in a rice– wheat cropping system on growth and yield of crops and on soil fertility. Experimental Agriculture 35: 427–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447979935403X

Rajkumara S, Gundlur S S, Neelakanth J K and Ashoka P. 2014. Impact of irrigation and crop residue management on maize (Zea mays)–chickpea (Cicer arietinum) sequence under no tillage conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84(1): 43–8.

Ram, H., Kler, D.S., Singh, Y. and Kumar, K. 2010. Productivity of maize (Zea mays) – wheat (Triticum aestivum) system under different tillage and crop establishment practices. Indian Journal of Agronomy 55(3): 185–90.

Ram Hari, Singh, Yadvinder, Saini K S, Kler D S, Timsina J and Humphreys E J 2012. Agronomic and economic evaluation of permanent raised beds, no tillage and straw mulching for an irrigated maize–wheat system in northwest India. Experimental Agriculture 48(1): 21–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479711000809

Saad A A, Das T K, Rana D S and Sharma A R. 2015. Productivity, resource-use efficiency and economics of maize (Zea mays)– wheat (Triticum aestivum)–greengram (Vigna radiata) cropping system under conservation agriculture in irrigated north-western Indo-Gangetic plains. Indian Journal of Agronomy 60(4): 502–10.

Sangar S, Abrol I P and Gupta K K. 2005. Conservation Agriculture: Conserving Resource Enhancing Productivity. Centre for Advancement of Sustainable Agriculture, NAAS Complex, New Delhi.

Sharma P, Vikas A, Maruthi G R, Sankar and Singh B. 2009. Influence of tillage practices and mulching options on productivity, economics and soil physical properties of maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(11): 865–70.

Singh G, Sharma G L and Golada S L. 2011. Integrated nutrient management on quality protein maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Progressive Agriculture 2(3): 65–7.

Singh Y. 2003. Crop residue management in Rice-Wheat system, RWCCIMMYT: Addressing resource conservation issues in rice-wheat systems of south Asia: A Resource Book, Vol 153. Rice-Wheat consortium for the Indo- Gangetic plains- CIMMYT, New Delhi.

Sinha N K, Chopra U K, Singh A K, Mohanty M, Somasundaram J and Choudhary R S. 2014. Soil physical quality as affected by management practices under maize–wheat system. National Academy of Science 37(1): 13–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-013-0194-3

Tabatabaii E S, Yarnia M, Benam M B K and Tabrizi E F M. 2011. Effect of Potassium Fertilizer on corn yield (Jeta cv.) under drought stress condition American–Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science 10(2): 257–63.

Tripathy R and Singh A. 2004. Effect of water and nitrogen management on aggregate size and carbon enrichment of soil in rice-wheat cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 167(2): 216–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200321175

Wei T, Zhang P, Wang K, Ding R, Yang B and Nie J. 2015. Effects of wheat straw Incorporation on the availability of soil nutrients and enzyme activities in semi-arid areas. Plos one 10(4): e0120994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120994

Downloads

Submitted

2017-07-04

Published

2017-07-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

M, R., SINGH, Y. V., DAS, T. K., & MEENA, M. C. (2017). Effect of crop residue and potassium management practices on productivity and economics of conservation agriculture based maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(7), 855–861. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i7.71761
Citation