Seasonal variation in fresh fruit bunch production in dura oil palm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i9.74189Keywords:
Bunch number, Bunch weight, Calendar year, Cross combination, Dura, Season, Oil palm, PhotoperiodAbstract
An attempt was made to study the temporal variation in the Fresh Fruit Bunche’s (FFB) production in dura palms at Indian Institute of Oil Palm Research, Pedavegi, Andhra Pradesh. The performance of the two D × D cross combinations, viz. 240D × 281D (CC1 palms) and 80D × 281D (CC2 palms) planted in the year 2000 in terms of number and weight of fresh bunch produced during different months during 2005 – 2012 was analysed. The FFB production (in terms of number and weight) was maximum (seasonal maxima) during the four months from May to August in an year which accounted for almost 2/3rd of FFB production of the year. Seasonal minima in the FFB production was observed during the winter starting from October to March. FFB production exhibited a trend of alternate bearing that is good yield in one year (on year) and reduced or poor yield in the subsequent year (off year), the trend being consistent in respect of bunch weight. The average bunch weight continuously increased from the 6th to 13th year of the plantation. The difference in FFB production not significantly different whereas the duration of FFB production (seasonal maxima) was significantly different among crosses. In Andhra Pradesh, it could be the non-availability of short days or non-availability of pollen and or pollinating weevil during rainy season (June to October in Andhra Pradesh) resulting in reduced flowering and subsequently low harvest of FFB (after 5-6 months of flowering) during November to March (Seasonal minima).Downloads
References
Adam H, Jouannic S, Escoute J, Duval Y, Verdeil J L and Tregear J W. 2005. Reproductive developmental complexity in the African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis, Arecaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1836–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.11.1836
Baktir I, Ulger S and Kaynak L. 2004. Relationship of seasonal changes in endogenous plant hormones and alternate bearing of olive trees. Hort Science 39 (5): 987–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.5.987
Corley R H V. 1976. Inflorescence abortion and sex differentiation. (In) Oil Palm Research. Corley R H V, Hardon J J, Wood B J (Eds). Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Corley R H V and Tinker P B. 2003. The Oil Palm, 4th edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470750971
Crane J C and Iwakiri B T. 1981. Morphology and reproduction in pistachio. Horticultural Reviews 3: 376–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118060766.ch8
Ebert A and Bangerth F. 1981. Relations between the concentration of diffusable and extractable gibberellin-like substances and the alternate-bearing behaviour in apple as affected by chemical fruit thinning. Scientia Horticulturae 15(1): 45–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(81)90060-1
Henson I E. 1999. Notes on oil palm productivity. V. Evaluation of alternative mechanisms for supporting seasonal variation in dry matter production. Journal of Oil Palm Research II: 41–52.
Henson I E. 2006. Modelling the impact of climatic and climate-related factors on oil palm growth and productivity. MPOB Technology 28: 1–43.
Henson I E. 2007. Modelling the effects of physiological and morphological characters on oil palm growth and productivity. Oil Palm Bulletin 54: 1–26.
Korpelainen H. 1998. Labile sex expression in plants. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 73: 57–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0006323197005148
Lavee S. 1985. Olea europea. (In) CRC Handbook of Flowering, pp 423-34. Halevy A H (Ed). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Legros S, Mialet-Serra I, Caliman J P, Siregar F A, Cle´ment-Vidal, A and Dingkuhn M. 2009. Phenology and growth adjustments of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) to photoperiod and climate variability. Annals of Botany 104: 1171–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp214
Litz R E. 2009. Mango. (In) Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants. Part 5. Transgenic Tropical and Subtropical Fruits and Nuts, pp 163-74. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405181099.k0506
Monselise S P and Goldschmidt E E. 1982 Alternate bearing in fruit trees. Horticultural Reviews 4: 128–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06519-6_5
Natalia M F, Carlos M, Carmen M, González M, Eduardo Primo M, Manuel Agustí and Domingo J I. 2011. Fruit regulates seasonal expression of flowering genes in alternate-bearing ‘Moncada’ mandarin. Annals of Botany 108 (3): 511–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr164
Rallo L, Torreño P, Vargas, A and Alvarado J. 1994. Dormancy and alternate bearing in olive. Acta Horticulturae 356:127–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.356.28
Shalom L, Samuels S, Zur N, Shlizerman L and Zemach H. 2012. Alternate bearing in citrus: Changes in the expression of flowering control genes and in global gene expression in ON- versus OFF-crop trees. PLoS ONE 7(10): e46930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046930
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.