Resource integration for livelihood and nutritional security of farmers of Tehri Himalayas of India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i9.74199Keywords:
Farming systems, Livelihood, Nutrition, System, UttarakhandAbstract
Farming system approach is considered as most powerful tool for improving livelihood of small and marginal farmers. A study was undertaken during 2011-2015 to characterize the existing farming situation in New Tehri district of Uttarakhand with the objective of holistic improvement of livelihood, profit maximization and on-farm employment generation through integrated farming system (IFS) approach. Analysis of results revealed that crop + dairy was thepredominant farming system (68%) followed by crop + dairy + horticulture + goatery. Introduction of improved cultivars of rice, maize, wheat and barley gave additional yield of 17 to 42 % over traditional cultivars. Similarly, introduction of improved cultivars and need based integrated pest management resulted in increased productivity of pre-dominant pulses like pigeonpea, blackgram, mungbean, kidneybean, horsegram, chickpea and lentil by 31% to
70%. Introduction of improved cultivars of soybean (Cv. PS 1092) and mustard (Cv. Pusa Bold) along with integrated plant nutrient management (IPNM) measures provided enhanced yield of 27% (soybean) and 46% (mustard) in Narendra Nagar, whereas yield enhancement of 15% (soybean) and 47% (mustard) was recorded in Thauldar Block. Interventions in horticulture component also resulted in yield improvement and enhanced productivity. The monthly vegetable availability increased from 110 to 154 kg house hold in the study area. The results of the study showed that
annual requirement of proteins (110-125 kg) and carbohydrates (550 to 575 kg) for a five member can be easily met out through integrated farming system approach. This study envisaged that integrated farming system approach along with improved technological interventions may bring long-term farming system sustainability, improved livelihood and generate sufficient local employment which will restrict rural youth migration in hill areas of Uttarakhand.
Downloads
References
Behera U K, Sharma A R and Mahapatra I C. 2007. Crop Diversification for efficient resource management in India: Problems, prospects and policy. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 30(3): 97–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v30n03_08
Ershad S M E. 2005. Performance of hybrid layers and native hens under farmers’ management in a selected area of Bangladesh. International Journal of Poultry Science 4(4): 228–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2005.228.232
Frei M and Becker K. 2005. Integrated rice-fish culture: coupled production saves resources. Natural Resources Forum 29(2): 135–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00122.x
Gangwar B, Singh J P, Prusty A K and Prasad K. 2014. Research in Farming Systems, p 584.
Gangwar B, Singh J P, Prusty A K and Prasad K, (Eds). Today and Tomorrow Printers and Publisher, New Delhi.
Ghosh S N. 2008. Fruit production and quality improvement in banarasi karka cultivar of ber through canopy management. Acta Horticulturae 840: I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.840.50
Grau H R and Aide T M. 2007. Are rural-urban migration and sustainable development compatible in mountain systems? Mountain Research and Development 27(2): 119–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.0906
Jayraj D. 2013. “Family Migration in India: “Push” or “Pull” or Both or What?” Economic and Political Weekly XLVIII (42): 44–52.
Kashyap P, Kansal A, Prusty A K and Singh J P. 2015. Evaluation of horticulture based IFS models for providing nutritional security to small and marginal farmers of Western plain zone of Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Economic Plants 2 (1): 15–7.
Khanal N R and Watanabe T. 2006. Abandonment of agricultural land and its consequences. Mountain Research and Development 26(1): 32–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2006)026[0032:AOALAI]2.0.CO;2
Patel N and Rajput T B S. 2003. Yield response of some vegetable crops to different levels of fertigation. Annals of Agricultural Research 24: 542–5.
Singh A K, Singh B and Kumar R. 2012. Integrated nutrient management under protected agriculture. System based Integrated Nutrient Management, pp 223-37.
Gangwar B and Singh V K (Eds). New India Publishing agency, New Delhi.
Yadav G S, Debnath C, Datta M, Ngachan S V, Yadav J S and Babu Subhash. 2013. Comparative evaluation of traditional and improved farming practices in Tripura. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(3): 310–4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.