Determination of maturity indices for harvesting of pomegranate (Punica granatum)

Authors

  • K DHINESH BABU
  • N V SINGH
  • N GAIKWAD
  • A MAITY
  • S K SURYAVANSHI
  • R K PAL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i9.74209

Keywords:

Brix-acid raio (BAR), Harvesting, Maturity indices, Physico-chemical parameters, Pomegranate

Abstract

Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) is an important fruit crop of arid and semiarid regions of the world with immense medicinal and nutritional value. Bhagwa, Ruby, Ganesh, G-137, Jalore Seedless, Arakta and Mridula are some of the popular cultivars of pomegranate which are commercially cultivated in different parts of India. These varieties differ in their maturity period (time taken from full bloom to harvest). Harvesting the fruits of pomegranate too early does not allow fruits to ripen properly while late harvesting limits the market life of fruits.Hence, an experiment was
conducted to determine the appropriate maturity indices for harvesting pomegranate during 2011-12 and 2012-2013. Days after full bloom (DAFB), fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, 100 arils weight, TSS, titrable acidity and brix-acid ratio (BAR) were recorded at 15 days interval after fruitset. The maturity indices, viz. total soluble solids (TSS) and brix-acid ratio determined for harvesting the fruits of pomegranate with better edible quality is as follows: ie. 15.95°B TSS and 31.90 BAR at 180 DAFB for Bhagwa, 15.80°B TSS and 32.91 BAR at 175 DAFB for Ruby, 16.10°B TSS, 37.44 BAR at 150 DAFB for Ganesh, 16.20°B TSS, 36.00 BAR at 145 DAFB for Jalore Seedless, 15.40°B TSS, 34.22 BAR at 140 DAFB for Arakta and 15.50°B TSS, 33.69 BAR at 140 DAFB for Mridula.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • K DHINESH BABU
    Principal Scientist (Horticulture – Fruit Science), ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Kegaon, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255
  • N V SINGH
    Scientist (Horticulture – Fruit Science), ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Kegaon, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255
  • N GAIKWAD
    Scientist (Process Engineering), ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Kegaon, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255
  • A MAITY
    Scientist (Soil Science),  ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Kegaon, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255
  • S K SURYAVANSHI
    Senior Research Fellow, ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Kegaon, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255
  • R K PAL
    Director, ICAR-National Research Centre on Pomegranate, Kegaon, Solapur, Maharashtra 413 255

References

Babu K D , Gaikwad N, Singh N V, Maity A, Suryawanshi S K, Pal R K and Chandra R. 2014. Determination of maturity indices for harvesting of pomegranate cv. Bhagwa. (In) Souvenir – National seminar-cum-exhibition on Pomegranate for nutrition, livelihood security and entrepreneurship development, 05-07 December, 2014, ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur, p 284.

Bankar G J and Prasad R N. 1992. Performance of important pomegranate cultivars in arid region. Annals of Arid Zone 31(3) :181–4.

Ben-Arie R, Segal N and Guelfat-Reich S. 1984. The maturation and ripening of the Wonderful pomegranate. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 109(6): 898–902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.109.6.898

Digrase S S. 2015. Effect of different plant growth regulators and chemicals on growth, yield and quality of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagawa. Ph D thesis,VNMKV, Parbhani. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/12.2/176-180

Gaikwad N N, Pal R K and Babu K D. 2014. Entrepreneurship development in pomegranate through value addition. (In) Souvenir – National seminar-cum-exhibition on Pomegranate for nutrition, livelihood security and entrepreneurship development, December 05-07, 2014, ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur, pp 264–71.

Godara P K, Godara N R, Jitender K, Surinder K, Kumar J And Kumar S. 1989. Quality assessment of pomegranate cultivars. Research Development Reporter 6: 76–80.

Jadhav V T and Sharma J. 2007. Pomegranate cultivation is promising. Indian Horticulture 30–1.

Khodade M S, Wavhal K N and Kala P N. 1999. Physicochemical changes during growth and development of pomegranate fruit. Indian Horticulture 47(1): 21–7.

Mir M M, Sofi A A, Ahmad I and Beigh M A. 2007. Performance of pomegranate cultivars under Karewa belts of Kashmir valley. SKUAST. Journal of Research 9: 104–8.

Mir M M, Umar I, Mi S A, Rehman M U, Rather G H and Banday S A. 2012. Quality evaluation of pomegranate crop – A review. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 14(4): 658–67.

NHB. 2014. Indian Horticulture Database, National Horticulture Board, Gurgaon.

Pal R K and Babu K D. 2014. Postharvest management and total utilization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). (In) Souvenir – National seminar-cum-exhibition on Pomegranate for nutrition, livelihood security and entrepreneurship development, 05-07 December 2014, ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur, pp 252–61.

Pal R K and Babu K D. 2015. Pomegranate. (In) Managing Postharvest Quality and Losses in Horticultural Crops, pp 517–33. Chadha K L and Pal R K (Eds). Daya Publishing House, New Delhi.

Panse V G and Sukhatme P V. 1985. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.

Prasad R N, Bankar G J and Vashishtha B B. 2000. Assessment of maturity in pomegranate on the basis of physico-chemical characteristics in arid region. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science 28(1 and 2): 69–70.

Ranganna S. 1986. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products, Second Edition. McGraw Hill Education (India) Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

Sulman Y, Fainberstein L and Lavee S. 1984. Pomegranate fruit development and maturation. Journal of Horticultural Science 59(2): 265–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1984.11515196

Downloads

Published

2017-09-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

BABU, K. D., SINGH, N. V., GAIKWAD, N., MAITY, A., SURYAVANSHI, S. K., & PAL, R. K. (2017). Determination of maturity indices for harvesting of pomegranate (Punica granatum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(9), 1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i9.74209