Agro-physical assessment of different pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars in lowland rice (Oryza sativa) fallow under no-till system for enhancing cropping intensity and productivity in mid hills of northeast India


469 / 388

Authors

  • ANUP DAS
  • SAMIK CHOWDHURY
  • JAYANTA LAYEK
  • RAMKRUSHNA G I
  • A S PANWAR
  • S V NGACHAN
  • JURI BURAGOHAIN

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i12.76487

Keywords:

Crude protein, No-till, Pea, Percent disease index, Rice fallow, System productivity.

Abstract

The cropping intensity of North Eastern Region (NER) of India is low (134%) mainly due to non-utilization of fallow lands after harvesting of rainy season rice (Oryza sativa L.). Pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one of the most potential leguminous field crops for crop diversification and enhancing productivity of rice based cropping systems in NER. Thus, a field experiment was conducted during 2012-13 and 2013-14 to evaluate the performance of pea cultivars under no-till (NT) condition after harvest of lowland rice in mid-hills (Umiam, Meghalaya, 950 m above sea level, 25°30’N latitude and 91°51’E longitude) of North East India.Twenty one pea cultivars were tested in rice fallow conditions under NT with the residual soil moisture. Out of 21 genotypes, 11 were pole type (PT) and 10 were dwarf type (DT). Among the cultivars, Arkel (95 days) followed by IPFD 4-6 (129 days) and IPFD 1-01 (130 days) were the most early maturing, and IPF 14 (150 days) and IPF 2-13 (150 days) were the most late maturing genotypes. Among all the cultivars, leaf area index, chlorophyll index, number of nodules/plant and nodule weight/plant were higher in Arkel among PT and IPFD 4-6 among DT cultivars. Among all PT cultivars, the higher seed yield, crude protein and total P content was recorded in Arkel (2.37 t/ha, 23.4% and 0.94%), VL-42 (2.33 t/ha, 23.2% and 0.91%) and MUD P 15 (2.29 t/ha, 22.3% and 0.84%); while among DT cultivars, these values were higher in IPFD 4-6 (2.25 t/ha, 20.7% and 0.75%), IPFD 1-01 (2.23 t/ha, 20.6% and 0.72%) and IPFD 99-13 (2.18 t/ha, 20.1% and 0.69%, respectively) than others. Aphid and rust were the most prominent insect and disease, respectively. Among PT cultivars, IPF 99-26 followed by MUD P 15 and among DT cultivars, Prakash and IPFD 5-10 showed maximum resistance against pea aphid. VL-42 was the most disease resistant variety followed by Arkel among the PT and Vikash followed by IPFD 99-13 among the DT cultivars. Thus, the study revealed the opportunity of pea cultivation in lowland rice fallow with suitable cultivars and appropriate technologies in mid-altitude of Meghalaya.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • ANUP DAS
    Principal Scientist (Agronomy) and Head, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya
  • SAMIK CHOWDHURY
    Technical Officer, Agromet Division, ICAR Research Complex for NEH region, Mizoram Centre, Kolasib, Mizoram.
  • JAYANTA LAYEK
    Scientist (Agronomy, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya
  • RAMKRUSHNA G I
    Scientist (Agronomy), Central Institute of Cotton Research, Nagpur
  • A S PANWAR
    Director, Indian Institute of Farming System Research, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh.
  • S V NGACHAN
    Director, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya
  • JURI BURAGOHAIN
    ICAR Research Complex for NEH region, Umiam, Meghalaya.

References

Akhtar K P, Haider S, Khan M K R, Ahmad M, Sarwar N, Murtaza M A and Aslam M. 2010. Evaluation of Gossypium species for resistance to leaf curl Burewala virus. Annals of Applied Biology 157: 135–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00416.x

Anand T, Chandrasekaran A, Kuttalam S, Senthilraja G and Samiyappan S. 2010. Integrated control of fruit rot and powdery mildew of chilli using the bio control agent Pseudomonas fluorescence and a chemical fungicide. Biological Control 52: 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.09.010

Arshad M, Hussain S A, Ali N S A, Muhammad N and Ziaullah.1998. Screening of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars in Kohat valley. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 14(6): 559–62.

Blanco-Canqui J, Shapiro C A, Wortmann C S, Drijber R A, Mamo M, Shaver T M and Ferguson R B. 2013. Soil organic carbon: The value to soil properties. Soil and Water Conservation Journal 68: 129A–134A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.5.129A

Bray R H and Kurtz L T. 1945. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science 59: 39–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006

Das A, Patel D P, Ramkrushna G I, Munda G C, Ngachan S V, Buragohain J, Kumar M and Naropongla. 2014a. Crop diversification, crop and energy productivity under raised and sunken beds: results from a seven-year study in a high rainfall organic production system. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 30(2): 73–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2013.854709

Das A, Ramkrushna G I, Choudhury B U, Ngachan S V, Tripathi A K, Singh R K, Patel D P, Tomar J M S, Mohapatra K P, Layek J and Munda G C. 2014b. Conservation agriculture in rice and maize based cropping systems for enhancing crop and water productivity - participatory technology demonstration in north east India. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 42(1): 196–203.

Gangwar K S, Singh K K, Sharma S K and Tomar O K. 2006. Alternative tillage and crop residue management in wheat after rice in sandy loam soils of Indo-Gangetic plains. Soil & Tillage Research 88(1–2): 242–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.06.015

Hussain S A and Badshah N. 2002. Study on the adaptive behaviour of exotic pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties under local condition of Peshawar. Asian Journal of Plant Science 1(5): 567–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.567.568

Ishtiaq M, Ahmad Z and Shah A. 1996. Evaluation of exotic cultivars of pea in Peshawar valley. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 12(4): 425–31.

Ghosh P K, Hazra K K, Nath C P, Das A and Acharya C L. 2016. Scope, constraints and challenges of intensifying rice (Oryza sativa) through pulses. Indian Journal of Agronomy 61 (4th IAC Special issue): 122–48.

Lal R. 2013. Enhancing ecosystem service with no-till. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 28: 102–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170512000452

Qasim M, Zubair M and Wadan D. 2001. Evaluation of exotic cultivars of pea in Swat valley. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 17(4): 545–8.

Singh A K, Meena M K and Bharati R C. 2011. Sulphur and zinc nutrient management in rice lentil cropping system. (In): Proceedings of International Conference on Life Science Research for Rural and Agricultural Development, CPRS, Patna, Bihar, pp 66–7.

Singh D, Singh R M and Singh J. 1989. Variability and correlation studies in induced mutants of microsperma lentils. Indian Journal of Pulse Research 2(2): 107–11.

Subbiah B V and Asija G L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25: 259–60.

Watson D J. 1952.The physiological basis of varieties in yield. Advances in Agronomy 4: 101–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60307-7

Downloads

Submitted

2017-12-13

Published

2017-12-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DAS, A., CHOWDHURY, S., LAYEK, J., I, R. G., PANWAR, A. S., NGACHAN, S. V., & BURAGOHAIN, J. (2017). Agro-physical assessment of different pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars in lowland rice (Oryza sativa) fallow under no-till system for enhancing cropping intensity and productivity in mid hills of northeast India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(12), 1612–1618. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i12.76487
Citation