Marker assisted screening of F2 population for late blight (Phytophthora infestans) resistance in indeterminate tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under protected condition
258 / 108
Keywords:
Markers assisted selection, Phytophthora infestans, Resistance breeding, Solanum lycopersicumAbstract
Late blight (LB) (Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary) is a highly destructive disease of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) worldwide and attacks all the aerial parts of the plant including leaves, stems and immature green fruits causing 100% yield loss under congenial environmental conditions. The objective of this study was to identify molecular markers associated with Ph-2 and Ph-3 gene conferring LB resistance in tomato. Two co-dominant markers (TG422 and TG328) were associated with Ph-2 and Ph-3, which were cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences (CAPS) type. The tomato line PAU IND 2372 was crossed with the late blight resistant line LBR 21 to develop F2 population. A total of 540 plants were screened for the target loci and tagged. From 540 F2 plants, 112 were resistant for Ph-2 and 106 for Ph-3 gene and 281 plants were positive for both Ph-2 and Ph-3 gene. The pattern of segregation of susceptibility or resistance was investigated using the chi-square (χ2) test.
Downloads
References
Becktell M C, Daughtrey M L and Fry W E. 2005. Epidemiology and management of petunia and tomato late blight in the greenhouse. Plant Disease 89: 1000–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-1000
Brouwer D J and St. Clair D A. 2004. Fine maping of three quantitative trait loci for late blight resistance in tomato using near isogenic lines (NILS) and sub – NILS. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 628–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1469-8
Chowdappa P, Nirmal Kumar B J, Madhura S, Kumar Mohan S P, Myers K L, Fry W E, Squires J N and Cooke D E L. 2013. Emergence of 13_A2 Blue lineage of Phytophthora infestans was responsible for severe outbreaks of late blight on tomato in south-west India. Journal of Phytopathology 161: 49–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12031
Chowdappa P, Nirmal Kumar B J, Madhura S, Kumar Mohan S P, Myers K L, Fry W E and Cooke D E L. 2014. Severe outbreaks of late blight on potato and tomato in South India caused by recent changes in the Phytophthora infestans population. Plant Pathology 64: 191–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12228
Dorrance A E and Inglis D A.1997. Assessment of greenhouse and laboratory screening methods for evaluating potato foliage for resistance to late blight. Plant Disease 81: 1206–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.10.1206
FAOSTAT. 2013. FAO Statistical Databases. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division (http:// faostat.fao.org).
Foolad M R, Merk H L and Ashrafi H. 2008: Genetics, genomics and breeding of late blight and early blight resistance in tomato. Critical Review on Plant Science 27: 75–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680802147353
Fry W. 2008. Phytophthora infestans: the plant (and R gene) destroyer. Molecular Plant Pathology 9: 385–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00465.x
Foolad M R and Panthee D R. 2012. Marker assisted selection in tomato breeding. Critical Review on Plant Sciences 31: 93–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.616057
Fulton T M, Chunwongse J and Tanksley S D. 1995. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 13: 207–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02670897
Gotoh K, Akino S, Maeda A, Kondo N, Naito S, Kato M and Ogoshi A. 2005. Characterization of some Asian isolates of Phytophthora infestans. Plant Pathology 54: 733–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01286.x
Hakiza J J. 1999. The importance of resistance to late blight in potato breeding in Africa. (In) Proceedings of the Global Initiative on Late Blight Conference, Quito, Ecuador, March 16–19, p 4.
Li J, Liu L, Bai Y, Finkers R and Wang F. 2011. Identification and mapping of quantitative resistance to late blight (Phytophthora infestans) in Solanum habrochaites LA1777. Euphytica 179: 427–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0340-7
Merk H L, Ashrafi H and Foolad M R. 2012. Selective genotyping to identify late blight resistance genes in an accession of the tomato wild species Solanum pimpinellifolium. Euphytica 187: 63–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0729-6
Michalska A M, Zimnoch-Guzowska E, Sobkowiak S and Plich J. 2011. Resistance of potato to stem infection by Phytophthora infestans and a comparison to detached leaflet and field resistance assessments. American Journal of Potato Research 88: 367–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-011-9202-7
Mukalazi J, Adipala E, Sengooba T, Hakiza J J, Olanya M and Kidanemariam H M. 2001. Variability in potato late severity and its effect on tuber yield in Uganda. African Crop Science Journal 9: 195–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v9i1.27639
Nilson H E. 2006. Bioassay to detect small differences in resistance of tomato to late blight according to leaf age, leaf and leaflet position, and plant age. Australasian Plant Pathology 35: 297–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP06020
Nowicki M, Foolad M R, Nowakowska M and Kozik E U. 2012. Potato and tomato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans: An overview of pathology and resistance breeding. Plant Disease 96: 4–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-11-0458
Pearson K. 1922. On the chi – square test of goodness of fit. Biometrika 14: 186–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2331860
Robbins M D, Masud M A T, Panthee D R, Gardner C O, Francis D and Stevens M A.2010. Marker –assisted selection for coupling phase resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus and Phytophthora infestans in tomato. Hort Science 45: 1424–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.10.1424
Thind T S, Moha C, Sokhi S S and Bedi J S. 1989. A detached leaf technique for maintenance and multiplication of Phytophthora infestans and evaluation of fungicides. Current Science 58: 388–9.
Wilson C and Tisdell C. 2001. Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental health and sustainability costs. Ecological Economics 39: 449–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00238-5
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.