Early maturing mutants of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) induced by chemical mutagens


256 / 63

Authors

  • MOHAMMAD RAFIQ WANI Senior Assistant Professor, Depatment of Botany, Abdul Ahad Azad Memorial Government Degree College, Bemina, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190 018

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i4.79139

Keywords:

Chemical mutagens, Chickpea, Early flowering and maturity, Genetic variability

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the extent of induced genetic variability for two quantitative traits, viz. days to flowering and maturity by three chemical mutagens namely methylmethane sulphonate (MMS), hydrazine hydrate (HZ) and sodium azide (SA) in M4 generation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). The mean days to flowering and maturity were significantly reduced in all the treatments with the exception of 0.01% of SA. MMS treatments were found to be more effective in reducing the flowering and maturity period than HZ and SA. The genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV), heritability (h2) and genetic advance increased manifold in the treated population indicating that these traits are controlled by additive genetic variance. Magnitude of GCV, h2 and GA were recorded to be higher with 0.2% of MMS treatment followed by 0.03% of HZ and SA. Enhancement in range of genetic variability for days to flowering and maturity in M4 generation is indicative of wider scope of selection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arulbalachandran D and Mullainathan L. 2009. Chlorophyll and morphological mutants of black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) derived by gamma rays and EMS. Journal of Phytology 1: 236–41.

Badigannavar A M and Murty G S S. 2007. Genetic enhancement of groundnut through gamma ray induced mutagenesis. Plant Mutation Reports 1(3): 16–21.

Bolbhat S N, Gawade B B, Bhoge V D, Wadavkar D S, Shendage V S and Dhumal K N. 2012. Effect of mutagens on frequency and spectrum of viable mutations in horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc). Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences 1(1): 45–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-0114555

Gaul H. 1964. Mutations in plant breeding. Radiation Botany 4: 155–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-7560(64)80069-7

Girja M, Dhanaval D and Gnanamurthy S. 2013. Gamma rays and EMS induced flower colour and seed mutants in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Wasp). Advances in Applied Sciences Research 4(2): 134–9.

Gumber R K and Sarvjeet S. 1996. Genetics of flowering time in chickpea-A preliminary report. Crop Improvement 23: 295–6.

Ibrahim A F and Sharaan A N. 1974. Studies on certain early barley mutants in M3 and M4 generations after seed irradiation with gamma rays. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenzuchtung 73: 44–57.

ICRISAT. 2005. Consultative group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) © by ICRISAT. Availabe on www.google. com.

Jana M K and Roy K. 1973. Induced quantitative mutations in rice. Radiation Botany 13: 245–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-7560(73)90296-2

Johnson H W, Robinson H F and Comstock R E. 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 47: 314–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x

Kaul M L H. 1980. Radiation genetic studies in garden pea IX. Non-allelism of early flowering mutants and heterosis. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenzuchtung 84: 192–200.

Khadke S G and Kothekar V S. 2011. Genetic Improvement of moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal) through mutation breeding. Breeding of Pulse Crops, pp 34-54. Khan S and Kozgar M I (Eds). Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, India.

Kharkwal M C. 2000. Induced mutations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). IV. Types of macro-mutations induced. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 60(3): 305–20.

Kumar P R. 1972. Radiation induced variability in improvement of brown sarson. Radiation Botany 12: 309–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-7560(72)80001-2

Lin C Y, Pevzner I and Friars G W. 1979. Experimental investigation of errors of heritability estimates in index selection. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 21: 303–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/g79-034

Manjaya J G and Nandanwar R S. 2007. Genetic improvement of soybean variety JS 80-21 through induced mutations. Plant Mutation Reports 1(3): 36–40.

Micke A. 1979. Crop improvement by induced mutations. Use of mutation induction to alter the ontogenic pattern of crop plants. Gamma Field Symposium 18: 1–23.

Shamsuzzaman K M and Shaikh M A Q. 1991. Early maturing and high seed yielding chickpea mutant. Mutation Breeding Newsletter 37: 4–5.

Sheeba A, Ibrahim S M, Yogameenakshi P and Babu S. 2003. Effect of mutagens on quantitative traits in M2 generation in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 63(2): 173–4.

Singh R K and Chaudhary B D. 1985. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana.

Sneep J. 1977. Selection for yield and early generation of self-fertilizing crops. Euphytica 26: 27–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032064

Solanki I S and Sharma B. 2002. Induced polygenic variability in different groups of mutagenic damage in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 62(2): 135–9.

Solanki I S. 2005. Isolation of macro-mutations and mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency in lentil. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 65(4): 264–8.

Tar’an B, Warkentin T, Somers J D, Miranda D, Vandenberg A, Blade S and Bing D. 2004. Identification of quantitative trait loci for grain yield, seed protein concentration and maturity in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 136: 297–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000032721.03075.a0

Toker C, Uzun B and Ertoy Inci N. 2011. Mutation Breeding in Chickpea. Breeding of Pulse Crops, pp 1-21. Khan S and Kozgar M I (Eds.). Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana.

Verma A K, Singh R R and Singh S. 2014. Variability in morphological characters and alkaloid profile of EMS induced mutants of Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 74(3): 362–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2014.00854.2

Wani M R and Kozgar M I. 2016. Induction of early flowering and maturing mutants in mungbean. International Journal on Agricultural Sciences 7(1): 79–88.

Wani M R, Lone M A, Sheikh S A, Dar M S, Tak M A, Ahmad P and Khan S. 2012. Induction and assessment of genetic variability for yield and yield contributing traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Plant Genomics 2(1): 28–33.

Wani M R. 2017. Induced chlorophyll mutations, comparative mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of chemical mutagens in lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 16: 221–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2017.221.226

Yaqoob M and Rashid A. 2001. Induced mutation studies in some mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) cultivars. Online Journal of Biological Sciences 1(9): 805–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2001.805.808

Zakri A H and Jalani B S. 1998. Improvement of soybean through mutation breeding. Improvement of grain legume production using induced mutations. (In) Proceedings of Workshop, Pullman Washington, United States of America, pp 451–61.

Downloads

Submitted

2018-04-24

Published

2018-04-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

WANI, M. R. (2018). Early maturing mutants of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) induced by chemical mutagens. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(4), 635-640. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i4.79139
Citation