Vegetable intervention for livelihood and nutritional security of small landholders: key component for enhancing the income of farmers


284 / 77

Authors

  • R K YADAV Division of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • A K MISHRA Water Technology Centre, Indian AgriculturalResearch Institute, New Delhi, India
  • S K BANDYOPADHYAY Centre for Environmental Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • B S TOMAR Division of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • H CHOUDHARY Division of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i4.79151

Keywords:

Farmers’ income, Haryana, India, Livelihood, Mewat, Profitability, Vegetable cultivation

Abstract

Growing vegetable crops in Mewat poses a serious challenge due to its agro-climatology and edaphic characteristics. The main occupation of inhabitants in Mewat is agriculture and allied agro-based activities. Seeing the importance of area, an attempt was made to introduce vegetables cultivation at commercial level to increase the income of farmers and improve their livelihood condition. The introduction of crops, like tomato, brinjal and bottlegourd in Mewat has enhanced the farmer's income significantly and it has attained commercial status. Though income and yield enhancement was recoded at every farmer's level but some farmers who were mainly landless and practicing vegetable farming on rented land could increase their profit to a record level in a period of 3 years from 2011 to 2013. On an average basis in tomato, brinjal and bottlegourd, the yield increased up to 58%, 44% and 82% and profitability up to 49%, 48% and 55% respectively. If other interventions like, drip irrigation, Integrated Pest and Nutrient Management (IPM and INM), polyhouse cultivation, off-season nursery and vegetable production, efficient post-harvest handling with cool chain facilities, value addition and processing, contract farming etc. are added, the income and profitability may increase many folds. On over all basis, bottlegourd variety Pusa Naveen, brinjal variety Pusa Uttam and tomato hybrids Heemsohna and US 2853 were most demanding and fetched higher prices due to their high yield and fruit quality attributes. Therefore, it was proved that vegetable production is the emerging sector in agricultural diversification that would augment income of smallholders and generate employment opportunities in rural areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chand Ramesh. 1999. Diversification through high value crops in western Himalayan region: Evidence from Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 41(4): 652–63.

Das Anup, Munda G C, Azad Thakur N S, Yadav R K, Ghosh P K, Ngachan S V, Bujarbaruah K M, Lal B, Das S K, Mahapatra B K, Islam M and Dutta K K. 2014. Rainwater harvesting and integrated development of agri-horti-livestock-cum pisciculture in high altitudes for livelihood of Tribal farmers. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84 (5): 643–9.

Irz X and Roe T. 2000. Can the world feed itself? Some insights from growth theory. Agrekon 39 (3): 513–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2000.9523669

Joshi, P K, Gulati A, Birthal P S and Tewari L. 2003. Agricultural diversification in South Asia: Patterns, determinants and policy implications. MTID Discussion Paper No. 57, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, USA.

National Horiculture Board. 2017. Third advance estimate of 2016-17 area and production of Horticultural crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. www.nhb.gov.in/.

Pingali P L and Rosegrant M W. 1995. Agricultural commercialization and diversification: Processes and policies. Food Policy 20(3): 171–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(95)00012-4

Ryan J G and Spencer D C. 2001. Future Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural R&D in the Semi-arid Tropics. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Schreinemachers Pepijn, Wu Mei-huey, Uddin Md. Nasir, Ahmad Shahabuddin and Peter Hanson. 2016. Farmer training in off-season vegetables: Effects on income and pesticide use in Bangladesh. Food Policy 61: 132–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.03.002

Singh R B, Kumar P and Woodhead T. 2002. Smallholder Farmers in India: Food Security and Agricultural Policy. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.

Sudha M, Gajanana T M and Murthy Sreenivasa D. 2006. Economic impact of commercial hybrid seed production in vegetables on farm income, employment and farm welfare – A case of tomato and okra in Karnataka. Agricultural Economics Research Review 19: 251–68.

Thirtle C, Beyers, L, Lin L, Mckenzie-Hill V, Irz X, Wiggins S and Piesse J. 2002. The impact of changes in agricultural productivity on the incidence of poverty in developing countries. DFID report no. 7946, Department for International Development (DFID), London, UK.

Zaman M, Hemel R A and Ferdous T. 2010. Comparative profitability of winter vegetables in a selected area of Dhaka district. ASA Univ. Rev. 4(1): 217–23.

Downloads

Submitted

2018-04-24

Published

2018-04-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

YADAV, R. K., MISHRA, A. K., BANDYOPADHYAY, S. K., TOMAR, B. S., & CHOUDHARY, H. (2018). Vegetable intervention for livelihood and nutritional security of small landholders: key component for enhancing the income of farmers. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(4), 651-656. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i4.79151
Citation