Stability analysis of sugarcane (Saccharum spp) genotypes for matric and quality traits by AMMI Model

DEVENDRA KUMAR; SANJEEV KUMAR; L K MEENA; L R MEENA; S P SINGH

doi:10.56093/ijas.v88i4.79152

Authors

DEVENDRA KUMAR Senior Scientist (Plant Breeding), IFSM Division, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250 110
SANJEEV KUMAR Principal Scientist (Plant Breeding), ICAR-IISR, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
L K MEENA Scientist (Plant Physiology), CSRM Division, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250 110
L R MEENA Principal Scientist and Head, IFSM Division, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250 110
S P SINGH ACTO, IFSM Division, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250 110

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i4.79152

Keywords:

Adaptability, AMMI model, GÃ—E interaction, IPCA, Saccharum spp, Stability

Abstract

The experiment across nine environments (three cuttings × three locations) was conducted during 2009-10 and 2010-11 crop seasons to study the effect of genotype × environment interaction (GEI) on a cane, CCS yield and sucrose (%) in sugarcane (Saccharum spp). Analysis of variance of 10 genotypes revealed that genotype, environment and GEI were highly significant. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was used to interpret the behaviour of genotype, environment and their interaction. In fact, the objective of this study was to identify stable and adaptable genotypes across the locations and to determine the magnitude of G×E interaction. AMMI analysis of variance showed that 52.93% of the total SS for cane yield, 60.48% for CCS yield ad 56.0% for sucrose (%) was attributed to the environmental effects, indicating that the locations were diverse. The PCA-1 and PCA-2 were also significant and both sums contributed cumulatively to 66.84% to the total of G×E interaction. The genotype CoP 05437 (4) exhibited high cane and CCS yield along with wider stability and adaptability to the different environments. However, BO 91 (8), CoSe 092423 (10), CoSe 05452 (5), Co 05019 (2) and CoBln 04174 (7) genotypes showed instability and specific adaptability to the environments, while CoP 09301 (9) genotype showed higher sucrose (%) and greater stability across the environments for this trait.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Annicchiarico P. 1997. Joint regression versus AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interaction for cereals in Italy. Euphytica 94: 53–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050517

Crossa J, Gauch H G and Zobel R W. 1990. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Science 30: 493–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030003x

Gauch H G. 2006.Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science 46: 1488–1500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193

Gauch H G and Zobel R W. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. (In) Genotype by Environment Interaction, pp 85-122. Kang M S and Gauch H G (Eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049374.ch4

Guerra E P, Oliveira R A, Daros E, Zambon J L C, Ido O T and Fitho J V B. 2009. Stability and adaptability of early maturing sugarcane clones by AMMI analysis. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 9: 266–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12702/1984-7033.v09n03a08

Kempton R A. 1984. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environmental interaction. Journal of Agricultural Science 103: 123–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600043392

Kumar S, Singh J, Singh P K and Pandey D K. 2007.Stability of yield and its components in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.Hybrid complex).Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 77: 200–3.

Naroui Rad M R, Abdul Kadir M, Rafii M Y, Hawa Z E Jaafar, Naghavi M R and Ahmadi Farzanch. 2013. Genotype × environment interaction by AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in three consecutive generations of wheat under normal and drought stress conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7(7): 956–61.

Milligan S B, Gravois K A, Birchoff K P and Martin F A. 1990. Crop effects on broad-sense heritabilities and genetic variances of sugarcane yield components. Crop Science 30: 344–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000020020x

Nair N V and Govindraj P. 2007. Improving sugarcane productivity in the sub-tropics problems and potential.Platinum Jubilee Souvenir, SBI, RC, Karnal, pp 93–8.

Pedro Hennique costa de Mattos, Ricardo Augusto de Oliveira, Joao Carlos Bespalhok Filho, Edelclaiton Daros and Mario Alvaro Aloiso Verissimo. 2013. Eva lunation of sugarcane genotypes and production environments in Parana by GGE biplot and AMMI analysis. Crop Breeding and Applied Bio-technology 13: 83–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-70332013000100010

Queme J L, Orzoo H, Ovalle W, Soto G and Meigar M. 2001.AMMI analysis of sugarcane trials in Guatemala. Proceeding of International Society of Sugarcane Technologists 24:512–6.

Rao P S, Reddy P S, Rathore A, Reddy B V and Panwar S. 2011. Application GGE biplot and AMMI model to evaluate sweet sorghum hybrids for genotype × environment interaction and seasonal adaptation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81: 438–44.

Rea Remon, De Sousa-vieina Orlando, Ramon Miguel, Alejos Gleenys, Diaz Alida and Briceno Rosaura. 2011. AMMI analysis and its application to sugarcane Regional Trials in Venezuela. Sugar Technology 13(2): 108–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-011-0070-8

Sandhu S K, Ram B, Kumar S, Singh R S, Uppal SK, Brar K S, Singh P and Nair N V. 2012. GGE biplot analysis for visualization of performance rank and stability of sugarcane genotypes. International Sugar Journal 114(1367): 810–20.

Kumar Sanjeev, Hasan S S, Singh P K, Pandey D K and Singh J. 2009. Interpreting the effects of genotype × environment interaction on cane and sugar yields in sugarcane based on the AMMI Model. Indian Journal of Genetics 69(3): 225–31.

Singh P K, Kumar S and Singh J. 2000. Stability analysis for sugarcane genotypes grown under three different conditions. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 15: 52–8.

Zobel R W, Wright M J and Gauch H G. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80: 388–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x