Effect of crop establishment practices on the performance of component cultivars under pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in IGP


Abstract views: 256 / PDF downloads: 38

Authors

  • UMMED SINGH Senior Scientist, Division of Crop Production, ICAR-IIPR, Kanpur
  • C S PRAHARAJ Principal Scientist and Head, Division of Crop Production, ICAR-IIPR, Kanpur
  • S S SINGH Director, ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Kolkata
  • K K HAZRA Research Scholar, Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal
  • N KUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208 024

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i5.80050

Keywords:

Economics, Nutrient harvest index, Pigeonpea–Wheat, Raised–bed, Ridge–furrow, System productivity

Abstract

Pigeonpea–wheat rotation is emerging as a potential alternative to existing rice–wheat system of Indo–Gangetic plains because of many inherent constraints right from requirements of higher inputs to deterioration in soil health in the latter. Realizing the importance of pigeonpea–wheat cropping system, the present study was conducted to evaluate diverse crop establishment practices [ridge pigeonpea followed by flatbed wheat (RP–FBW); raised–bed pigeonpea followed by raised–bed wheat (RBP–RBW)] in combination with three cultivars of pigeonpea (UPAS 120, ICP 67B, and Pusa 992), and two wheat cultivars (Shatabdi, Unnat Halna). Two–year study revealed that raised–bed practice of crop establishment resulted in 11.7% higher grain yield of pigeonpea as compared to ridge planting. Although the advantage of raised–bed was not apparent in wheat as 13.9% higher grain yield was recorded under flatbed over raised–bed establishment method. Based on pigeonpea equivalent yield and production economics, RP–FBW was found superior over RBP–RBW. However, the performance of component crops suggested that raised–bed for pigeonpea and flatbed for wheat could be the strategic crop establishment under pigeonpea–wheat rotation. Plant nutrient utilization as expressed by nutrient harvest index, physiological efficiency and utilization efficiency differed substantially within the cultivars of pigeonpea and wheat crop; and the preceding pigeonpea cultivars significantly influenced the nutrient acquisition in the successive wheat crop. Among the different cultivars, UPAS 120 pigeonpea followed by Unnat Halna wheat had far better response measured through the highest pigeonpea equivalent yield (2.71 t/ha), net return (` Rs. 69,331), and benefit: cost ratio (2.02). Thus, the study suggested that strategic cultivar selection and appropriate crop establishment method could be the key to maximize output from the pigeonpea–wheat system in IGP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahlawat I P S, Gangaiah B and Singh I P. 2005. Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) research in India: an overview. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 75(6): 309–20.

Cochran W G and Cox G M. 1957. Experimental Designs, 2nd ed. JohnWiley and Sons, Singapore.

Fahong W, Xuqing W and Sayre K. 2004. Comparison of conventional, flood irrigated, flat planting with furrow irrigated, raised bed planting for winter wheat in China. Field Crops Research 87(1): 35–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.09.003

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed, John Wiley and Sons, Singapore.

Hazra K K, Venkatesh M S, Ghosh P K, Ganeshamurthy A N, Kumar N, Nadarajan N and Singh A B. 2014. Long-term effect of pulse crops inclusion on soil–plant nutrient dynamics in puddled rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system on an Inceptisol of Indo-Gangetic plain zone of India. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 100(1): 95–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9629-6

Hobbs P R and Gupta R K. 2003. Resource conservation technologies for wheat in the rice–wheat system. (In) Ladha J K, Duxbury J E, Gupta R K and Buresh R J (Eds), Improving the Productivity and Sustainability of Rice–Wheat System: Issues and Impacts, pp 149–171. ASA Special Publication 65. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub65.c7

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

Johansen C, Ali M, Gowada C L L, Ramakrishna A, Nigam S N and Chauhan Y S. 2000. Regional opportunities for warm season grain legumes in the Indo–Gangetic Plain. (In) Legumes in Rice and Wheat Cropping Systems of the Indo–Gangetic Plain–Constraints and Opportunities. pp 185–99. Johansen C, Duxbury J M, Virmani S M, GowdaC L L, Pande S and Joshi P K (Eds). International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics/Cornell University, Patancheru, India/ Ithaca, New York, USA.

Praharaj C S, Singh U, Singh S S, Singh N P and Shivay Y S. 2016. Supplementary and life–saving irrigation for enhancing pulses production, productivity and water use efficiency in India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 61: S249–S261.

Praharaj C S, Singh U, Singh S S and Kumar N. 2017. Micro– irrigation in rainfed pigeonpea–Upscaling productivity under Eastern Gangetic Plains with suitable land configuration, population management and supplementary fertigation at critical stages. Current Science 112(1): 95–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i01/95-107

Sepat S, Sharma A R, Kumar D and Das T K. 2015. Effect of conservation agriculture practices on productivity and sustainability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in Indo–Gangetic plains of India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85(2): 212–6.

Sheoran O P, Tonk D S, Kaushik L S, Hasija R C and Pannu R S. 1998. Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. (In) Recent Advances in Information Theory, Statistics and Computer Applications, pp139–143. Department of Mathematics Statistics, CCS HAU, Hisar.

Singh U and Ahlawat I P S. 2006. Productivity, nutrient uptake and soil fertility as influenced by phosphorus management in pigeon pea – wheat cropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 76(9): 538–43.

Singh U and Ahlawat I P S. 2007. Phosphorus management in pigeonpea – wheat cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 52(1): 21–6.

Downloads

Submitted

2018-05-24

Published

2018-05-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, U., PRAHARAJ, C. S., SINGH, S. S., HAZRA, K. K., & KUMAR, N. (2018). Effect of crop establishment practices on the performance of component cultivars under pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in IGP. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(5), 691-697. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i5.80050
Citation