Heterotic potential, potence ratio, combining ability and genetic control of seed vigour traits for yield improvement in cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

Authors

  • SANDEEP KUMAR Scientist, ICARIndian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) Regional Station, Katrain, Kullu Valley, Himachal Pradesh 175 129
  • RAMESH KUMAR Professor, Department of Vegetable Science, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh 173 230
  • RAJESH KUMAR DOGRA Assistant Professor, Department of Fruit Science, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh 173 230

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i5.80088

Keywords:

Combining ability, Gene action, Heterosis, Potence ratio, Seed germination, Seed vigour index-I and -II

Abstract

The paucity of research on seed quality enhancement for yield improvement in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) motivated us to undertake this study. Therefore, present investigation was carried out to estimate the combining ability, gene action, heterosis and potence ratio for seed vigour and yield traits in 48 F1 crosses, developed by crossing 16 lines (8 gynoecious) and 3 testers during the year 2011. The seeds of all parents and their crosses, along with two standard checks (KH-1 and Pusa Sanyog), were assessed for different seed vigour (under laboratory conditions) and fruit yield (under open field conditions) traits during the year 2012. Experimental results revealed that parental lines LC-1-1, CGN-20953 and LC-3-3 were found superior on the basis of mean performance and general combining ability studies. Four cross combinations, viz., LC-1-1 × K-75, CGN-20953 × Poinsette, LC-3-3 × Poinsette and LC-3-3 × K-75 were found best on the basis of mean performance, specific combining ability and heterosis studies. Further, results of potence ratio reflected partial dominance for different seed vigour traits in all top five heterotic hybrids, while over dominance was exhibited by all the heterotic hybrids towards higher fruit yield per ha in cucumber. Gene action studies indicated the predominant role of non-additive gene action for the control of all the traits under study; hence heterosis breeding can be utilized for the genetic improvement of seed vigour and fruit yield traits in cucumber.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd-Rabou A M and Zaid N A. 2013. Development of high quality cucumber inbred lines and their hybrids for resistance to powdery mildew disease. Egyptian Journal of Plant Breeding 17: 15–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0004009

Abdul-Baki A A and Anderson J D. 1973. Vigor germinated in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Science 13: 630–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x

Airina C K, Pradeepkumar T, George T E, Sadhankumar P G and Krishnan S. 2013. Heterosis breeding exploiting gynoecy in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Journal of Tropical Agriculture 51 (1-2): 144–8.

Anonymous. 1985. International rules for seed testing. Seed Science Technology 13: 293–353.

Anonymous. 2009. Package of practices for vegetable crops. Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 202 p.

Bairagi S K, Singh D K and Ram H H. 2002. Studies on heterosis for yield attributes in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Vegetable Science 29: 75–7.

Bhardwaj R K and Kumar S. 2012. Studies on correlation between yield and seed characters in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). International Journal of Farm Sciences 2 (1): 54–8.

Dabholkar A R. 1992. Elements of Biometrical Genetics, pp 187-214. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi.

Dogra B S and Kanwar M S. 2011. Exploitation of combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2 (1): 55–9.

Finch-Savage W E and Bassel G W. 2016. Seed vigour and crop establishment: extending performance beyond adaptation. Journal of Experimental Botany 67 (3): 567–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv490

Goggi A S, Caragea P, Pollak L, Mcandrews G, Devries M and Montgomer Y K. 2008. Seed quality assurance in maize breeding programs: tests to explain variations in maize inbreds and populations. Agronomy Journal 100 (2): 343–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0151

Golabadi M, Golkar P and Eghtedary A. 2015. Combining ability analysis of fruit yield and morphological traits in greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 95 (2): 377–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2013-387

Golabadi M, Golkar P and Eghtedary A R. 2012. Assessment of genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes. European Journal of Experimental Biology 2 (3): 826–31.

Hamid A, Baloch J U and Khan N. 2002. Performance of six cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes in Swat-Pakistan. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 4 (4): 491–2.

Kalidas P, Munshi A D, Behera T K, Kumar R and Karmakar P. 2015. Estimating combining ability for yield and yield contributing traits in cucumber. Indian Journal of Horticulture 72 (1): 49–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2015.00009.2

Kempthorne O. 1957. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics, pp 458-71. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Kumar J, Munshi A D, Kumar R, Sureja A K and Sharma R K. 2013a. Combining ability and its relationship with gene action in slicing cucumber. Indian Journal of Horticulture 70 (1): 135–8.

Kumar S, Kumar D, Kumar R, Thakur K S and Dogra B S. 2013b. Estimation of genetic variability and divergence for fruit yield and quality traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in North-Western Himalayas. Universal Journal of Plant Science 1: 27–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujps.2013.010201

Kumar S, Kumar R, Kumar D, Gautam N, Dogra R K, Mehta D K, Sharma H D and Kansal S. 2016. Parthenocarpic gynoecious parental lines of cucumber introduced from Netherlands for developing high-yielding, quality hybrids. Journal of Crop Improvement 30: 352–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2016.1163762

Kumar S, Kumar R, Kumar D, Gautam N, Singh N, Parkash C, Dhiman M R and Shukla Y R. 2017. Heterotic potential, potence ratio, combining ability and genetic control of yield and its contributing traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 45 (3): 175–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2016.1270336

Kushwaha M, Yadav L B and Maurya R P. 2011. Heterobeltiosis and combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under mid hilly area of Uttrakhand. Progressive Agriculture 11: 103–7.

Legesse B W, Pixley K V and Botha A M. 2009. Combining ability and heterotic grouping of highland transition maize inbred lines. Maydica 54: 1–9.

Machikowa T, Saetang C and Funpeng K. 2011. General and specific combining ability for quantitative characters in sunflower. Journal of Agricultural Science 3 (1): 91–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v3n1p91

Moterle L M, Braccini A L, Scapim C A, Pinto R J B, Gonçalves L S A, Amaral J A T and Silva T R C. 2011. Combining ability of tropical maize lines for seed quality and agronomic traits. Genetics and Molecular Research 10 (3): 2268–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0458-2

Mule P N, Khandelwal V, Lodam V A, Shinde D A, Patil P P and Patil A B. 2012. Heterosis and combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Madras Agricultural Journal 99 (7/9): 420–3.

Munamava M R, Goggi A S and Pollak L. 2004. Seed quality of maize inbred lines with different composition and genetic backgrounds. Crop Science 44: 542–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.5420

Nerson H. 2007. Seed production and germinability of cucurbit crops. Seed Science and Biotechnology 1 (1): 1–10.

Olfati J A, Samizadeh H, Rabiei B and Peyvast G H. 2012. Griffing’s methods comparison for general and specific combining ability in cucumber. Scientific World Journal 2012: 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/524873

Panse V G and Sukhatme P V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, p 381. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Rai N and Rai M. 2006. Heterosis Breeding in Vegetable Crops, p 531. New India Publishing Agency New Delhi.

Rastogi K B. 1998. Cucumber hybrid production. (In) Breeding and Seed Production of Vegetable Crops by Centre of Advanced Studies in Horticulture (Vegetable Science), pp 76-80. Department of Vegetable Science, UHF, Nauni, Solan.

Sharma M, Singh Y, Singh S K and Dhangrah V K. 2016. Exploitation of gynoecious lines in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) for heterosis breeding. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 7 (2): 184–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23910/IJBSM/2016.7.2.1557

Sheoran O P, Tonk D S, Kaushik L S, Hasija R C and Pannu R S. 1998. Statistical Software Package for Agricultural Research Workers. (In) Recent Advances in Information theory, Statistics and Computer Applications, pp 139-43. Hooda D S and Hasija R C (Eds). Department of Mathematics Statistics, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. http://14.139.232.166/opstat/default.asp.

Sherpa P, Seth T, Shende V D, Pandiarana N, Mukherjee S and Chattopadhyay A. 2014. Heterosis, dominance estimate and genetic control of yield and post-harvest quality traits of tomato. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 6: 625–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v6i2.507

Singh D. 1973. Diallel analysis over environments-I. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 33: 127–36.

Singh R, Singh A K, Kumar S and Singh B K. 2012. Heterosis and inbreeding depression for fruit characters in cucumber. Indian Journal of Horticulture 69 (2): 200–4.

Singh R K and Chaudhary B D. 1997. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis, p, 342. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana.

Smith H H. 1952. Fixing transgressive vigor in Nicotiana rustica. (In) Heterosis, pp 161-74. Iowa State University Press, Ames (IA).

Tatlioglu T. 1993. Cucucmber: Cucumis sativus L. (In) Genetic Improvement of Vegetable Crops, pp 197-234. Kalloo G and Bergh B O (Eds.). Pergamon Press Ltd, Tarrytown, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-040826-2.50017-5

Wynne J C, Emery D A and Rice P M. 1970. Combining ability estimates in Arachis hypogaea L. II. Field performance of F1 hybrids. Crop Science 10: 713–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000060036x

Downloads

Published

2018-05-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, S., KUMAR, R., & DOGRA, R. K. (2018). Heterotic potential, potence ratio, combining ability and genetic control of seed vigour traits for yield improvement in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(5), 771-778. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i5.80088