Heterosis and combining ability for bushy and butternut traits in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)


339 / 112

Authors

  • NISHAN SINGH Research Scholar, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004
  • MOHINDER KAUR SIDHU Assistant Vegetable Breeder, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004
  • AJMER SINGH DHATT Senior Vegetable Breeder-cum-Head, Department of Vegetable Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i6.80634

Keywords:

Bushy vines, Butternut fruit, Combing ability, Heterosis, Pumpkin

Abstract

The improvement of pumpkin(Cucurbita moschata Duch ex Poir.) for intensive cultivation necessitates genetic studies, wherein, heterosis and combing ability were studied in half di-allel fashion involving bushy plants and butternut fruits. The genotypes, P-3621 was best general combiner for short vine, internode, equatorial diameter and high fruit shape index, P-6242 for pulp thickness, P-2211 for number of primary branches, P-10224 for polar diameter as well as vegetative growth and P-1343 for petiole length. However, high specific combining ability (SCA) in P-10224 × P-6242, PS × P-6242, P-41212 × P-2211, PS × P-364, P-41212 × P-6242, P-10224 × P-2211 revealed the occurrence of both additive and non-additive gene effects with the predominance of non-additive effects (σ2SCA/ σ2GCA >1) in the inheritance of bushy and butternut traits, which can be exploited through heterosis breeding and recurrent selection in pumpkin. The hybrids, P-3621 × P-2211, P-6711 × P-2211 and P-6711 × P-6242 had high pulp thickness as well as comparable yield potential with the check hybrids and could be exploited for commercial cultivation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bahari M, Rafii M Y, Saleh G B and Latif M A. 2012. Combining ability analysis in complete diallel crosses of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai). Scientific World Journal doi: 1100/2012 /543158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/543158

Davoodi S, Olfati J A, Hamidoghli Y and Sabouri A. 2016. Standard heterosis in Cucurbita moschata and Cucurbita pepo inter-specific hybrids. International Journal of Vegetable Science 22: 383–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2015.1042993

El-Tahawey M A F A, Kandeel A M and Youssef S M S. 2015. Heterosis, potence ratio, combining ability and correlation of some economic traits in di-allel crosses of pumpkins. Egypt Journal of Plant Breeding 2: 419–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0011721

Griffin B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in di-allel cross systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 9: 463–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9560463

Hanchinamani C N and Patil M G. 2009. Heterosis in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Asian Journal of Horticulture 4: 21–4.

Hussien A H and Hamed A A. 2015. Diallel analysis for studying heterosis and combining ability of some economical yield traits in pumpkin. Journal of Plant Production 3: 261–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2015.49318

Janaranjani K G, Kanthaswamy V and Kumar S R. 2016. Heterosis, combining ability and character association in bottle gourd for yield attributes. International Journal of Vegetable Science 15: 490–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2015.1084967

Li Y L, Li H Z, Cui C S, Zhang H Y and Gong G Y. 2007. Molecular markers linked to the dwarf gene in squash. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology 15: 279–82.

Naliyadhara M V, Dhaduk L K, Barad A V and Mehta D R. 2010. Combining Ability Analysis in Sponge Gourd (Luffa cylindrica (Roem.) L.). Vegetable Science 37: 21–24.

Narasannavar A R, Gasti V D, Shantappa T, Mulge R, Allolli T B and Thammaiah N. 2014. Heterosis studies in ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula L.). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1: 47–51.

Nisha S K and Veeraragavathatham D. 2014. Heterosis and combining ability for fruit yield and its component traits in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.). Advances in Applied Research 6: 158–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-2104.2014.00008.4

Pandey S, Jha A, Kumar S and Rai M. 2010. Genetics and heterosis of quality and yield of pumpkin. Indian Journal of Horticulture 67: 333–8.

Pandey S, Singh J, Updhaya A K, Ram D and Rai M. 2003. Ascorbate and carotenoid content in Indian collection of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.). Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 26: 51–53.

Ram D, Kumar V, Rai M, Singh T B, Arunkumar and Chaubey T. 2007. Combining ability studies of quantitative traits in sponge gourd. Vegetable Science 34: 170–2.

Singh B. 1993. A users’ manual to ‘BMM’, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, p 26–9.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1967. Statistical Methods, 6th Edition, p 593. Oxford and IBH Publication Co., Calcutta.

Tamil Selvi N A and Jansirani P. 2016. Heterosis in pumpkin for earliness, yield and yield-related characters. International Journal of Vegetable Science 22: 170–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2014.992562

Tamil Selvi N A, Jansirani P and Pugalendhi L. 2015. Line x Tester analysis for yield and its component traits in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.Ex Poir). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 4: 1004–10.

Thangamani C and Pugalendhi L. 2013. Heterosis studies in bitter gourd for yield and related characters. International Journal of Vegetable Science 19: 109–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2012.677115

Tyagi S V S, Sharma P, Siddiqui S A and Khandelwal R C. 2010. Combining ability for yield and fruit quality in luffa. International Journal of Vegetable Science 16: 267–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19315261003669858

Wu T, Zhou J H, Zhang Y F and Cao J S. 2007. Characterization and inheritance of a bush-type in tropical pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne). Scientia Horticulturae 114: 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.04.014

Downloads

Submitted

2018-06-14

Published

2018-06-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, N., SIDHU, M. K., & DHATT, A. S. (2018). Heterosis and combining ability for bushy and butternut traits in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(6), 877-883. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i6.80634
Citation