Comparative analysis of maize (Zea mays) hybrids under different methods of planting in spring season


307 / 91

Authors

  • AASHISH KUMAR Student, Department of Agronomy, CCS HAU, Hisar
  • B R KAMBOJ Senior Coordinator, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Damla, Yam nanagar, CCS HAU, Hisar
  • S K THAKRAL Professor, Department of Agronomy, CCS HAU, Hisar

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i6.80640

Keywords:

Economics, Maize hybrids, Planting methods, Yield attributes, Yield

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in Yamunanagar district of Haryana during spring 2015 to study the performance of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under different methods of planting in spring season. The five maize hybrids, i.e. HM-4, HM-9, HM-10, HM-11 and HQPM-5 were tested under three planting methods, viz. ridge, flat and furrow methods with three repeats. The yield attributing characters like cob length, number of grains/cob, grain weight/cob, cob weight/plant and 100 grain weight were found higher under ridge method of planting than flat and furrow methods. The grain yield, stover yield, biological yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio were also recorded higher under ridge method of planting than the other methods, whereas the yield attributing characters, yield, gross returns, net returns and benefit cost were observed higher in hybrid HM-10 over other hybrids grown in the field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anjum S A, Ehsanullah Ashraf, U, Tanveer M, Qamar R, Khan I. 2014. Morphological and phenological attributes of maize affected by different tillage practices and varied sowing methods. American Journal of Plant Sciences 5: 1657–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.511180

Dawadi D R and Sah S K. 2012. Growth and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to planting density and nitrogen levels during winter season in Nepal. Tropical Agricultural Research 23(3): 218–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v23i3.4659

Gul S, Khan M H, Khanday B A and Nabi S. 2015. Effect of sowing methods and NPK levels on growth and yield of rainfed maize. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Scientifica 7: 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/198575

Jat M L, Saharawat Y S and Gupta R. 2011. Conservation agriculture in cereal systems of South Asia: Nutrient management perspectives. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24: 100–5.

Kumar B, Chikkappa G K, Jat S L, Parihar C M, Yathish K R, Singh V, Hooda K S, Dass A K, Mukri G, Sekhar J C, Kumar R and Sai Kumar R. 2012. Maize biology: An Introduction. Technical Bullettin. Directorate of Maize Research, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), pp 32–36.

Kumar, S., Shivani and Kumar, S. 2014. performance of transplanted maize under varying age of seedling and method of nursery raising in the midlands of eastern region. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84: 877–82.

Painyuli A, Pal M S, Bhatnagar A and Bisht A S. 2013. Effect of planting techniques an irrigation scheduling on productivity and water use efficiency of sweet corn. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58: 344–8.

Saqib M, Zamir M S I, Tanveer A and Ahmad, A U H. 2012. Agro-economic evaluation of various maize hybrids under different planting patterns. Cercetari Agronomice inMoldova 46: 63–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10298-012-0056-z

Singh P, Kumar K, Kumar S A and Kumar R. 2015. Effect of crop establishment/irrigation techniques and nitrogen level on growth, yield, nutrient uptakee and quality of hybrid maize. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research 6: 82–90.

Zamir M S I, Yasin G, Javeed H M R, Ahmad A U H, Tanveer A and Yaseen M. 2012. Effect of different sowing techniques and mulches on the growth and yield behaviour of spring planted maize. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 46: 77–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10298-012-0076-8

Downloads

Submitted

2018-06-14

Published

2018-06-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, A., KAMBOJ, B. R., & THAKRAL, S. K. (2018). Comparative analysis of maize (Zea mays) hybrids under different methods of planting in spring season. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(6), 907-909. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i6.80640
Citation