Gender perspective of conservation agriculture


295 / 88

Authors

  • UJJWAL KUMAR Principal Scientist and Head, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014
  • RAMESH CHANDRA BHARATI Principal Scientist, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014
  • RAVI KANT CHAUBEY Senior Research Fellow, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014
  • K RAO Scientist, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014
  • VED PRAKASH Scientist, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014
  • ABHAY KUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i8.82535

Keywords:

Conservation agriculture, Gender, Madhubani, Paddy transplanter, Technology adoption, Zero tillage

Abstract

Conservation agriculture (CA) technologies are the future of sustainable agriculture. Many research, and developmental organizations including farmers group are engaged in promoting CA technology for more than a decade. Gender has an important role in adoption and dissemination of CA technologies that include use of zero tillage, paddy transplanter, crop diversification and other interventions. Present study has been conducted in Madhubani district of Bihar state to analyse gender segregated key benefits, advantages, disadvantages, issues and the key decision processes and criteria for CA technology adoption. Data were collected through focus group discussions involving male and female farmers. Important advantages of CA technologies expressed by the farmers group were reduction of labour, time saving, better yield, cost saving, low tillage cost and reduction in drudgery. The key problems and issues affecting the performance of CA technologies included the weed control, poor germination, and limited skillsof machine operators. Labour saving, cost saving, enhanced productivity, time-saving, less irrigation requirement,
and higher yield were among the most important factors that led to adoption of zero tillage in rice-wheat system.Preparation of mat nursery and trained operators for paddy transplanter were major criteria for adoption of mechanical paddy transplanter. Farmers were sceptical about the risk associated with CA technologies that included poor seed germination and weed infestation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2014. Statistical profile on women labour. Labour Bureau, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Goverment of India.

FAO. 2006. http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/en/1a.html

Gathala M K, Kumar V, Sharma P C, Saharawat Y S, Jat H S, Singh M, Kumar A, Jat M L, Humphreys E, Sharma D K, Sharma S, and Ladha J K. 2013. Optimizing intensive cereal based systems addressing current and future drivers of agricultural change in the northwestern Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 177: 85–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.002

Joshi P K. 2011. Conservation agriculture: An overview. Indian Journal of Economics 66(1): 53–63.

Keil A, D'souza A, and McDonald A J. 2015. Zero-tillage as a pathway for sustainable wheat intensification in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains: Does it work in farmers’ fields? Food Security 7(5): 983–1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0492-3

Kumar Ujjwal, Sarkar B, Chaubey R and Bhatt B P. 2016. Agricultural vulnerability assessment: A case of Madhubani district, Bihar. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7(2): 372–4.

Sangar S, Abrol J P and Gupta R K. 2005. Conservation Agriculture: Conserving Resources Enhancing Productivity, 19 p.Centre for Advancement of Sustainable Agriculture, National Agricultural Science Complex, New Delhi.

Singh R G, Kumar R and Gupta R K. 2010. Conservation agriculture based resource conservation technologies for rice-maize system for eastern IGP. Resource Conservation Technologies for Food Security and Rural Livelihood, pp 98–106.

Singh S S, Singh A K and Sundaram P K. 2014. Agro technological options for upscaling agricultural productivity in eastern Indo Gangetic plains under impending climate change situations: A review. Journal of Agrisearch 1(2): 55–65.

Downloads

Submitted

2018-08-20

Published

2018-08-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, U., BHARATI, R. C., CHAUBEY, R. K., RAO, K., PRAKASH, V., & KUMAR, A. (2018). Gender perspective of conservation agriculture. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(8), 1202-1207. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i8.82535
Citation