Effect of salinity and alkalinity on responses of halophytic grasses Sporobolus marginatus and Urochondra setulosa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i8.82578Keywords:
Alkalinity, Ionic relations, Osmolytes, Salinity, Sporobolus marginatus, Urochondra setulosaAbstract
An experiment was conducted in micro-plots filled with sandy loam soil having 14% clay and 0.33% organic carbon to see the responses of halophytic grasses Sporobolus marginatus and Urochondra setulosa collected from the extreme saline-sodic Kachchh plains, Bhuj, Gujarat, India under alkalinity/salinity. Maximum photosynthetic rate was recorded in control treatment. Photosynthetic rate decreased at pH 9.0 + EC 20 dS/m (11.25 and 17.8 μmol CO2/m2/s) in S. marginatus and U. setulosa respectively, along with reduction in stomatal conductance and transpiration rate. In comparison to control, increased accumulation of total soluble sugars and proline may be due to increased osmotic adjustment for both halophytes. Similarly, at mixed stress of pH 9.0 with EC 20 dS/m, the epicuticular wax load increased in both S. marginatus and U. setulosa (24.0 and 40.0 mg/g). A positive correlation of stress was seen with Na+ and Cl‑ content while negative correlation with K+ content. Na+ content increased to about 3-7 fold at salinity level, EC 35 dS/m. Similarly, with treatment of mixed stress of pH 9.0 with saline level EC 20dS/m, 3-6 times increase in Na+ with decrease in K+ was observed in S. marginatus and U. setulosa respectively. These grass species maintained better gas exchange properties with higher osmolytes accumulations and balanced ionic relations under high stress conditions of salinity and alkalinity. These attributes might be providing physiological adaptable mechanisms for growth under salt affected environments.Downloads
References
Bates L S, Waldren R P and Teare I D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39: 205-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
Bhatti A S, Steinert S, Sarwar G, Hilpert A and Jeschke W D. 1993. Ion distribution in relation to leaf age in Leptochloa fusca (L.). Kunth. (kallar grass). I. K., Na, Ca and Mg. New Phytologist 123: 539–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03766.x
Blum A. 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. pp. 1-223. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Bradford M M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 7: 248-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Burke J J. 2007. Evaluation of source leaf responses to water-deficit stresses in cotton using a novel stress bioassay. Plant Physiology 143: 108–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.087783
Calatayud A and Barreno E. 2001. Chlorophyll a fluorescence, antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in tomato in response to ozone and benomyl. Environmental Pollution 115(2): 283-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00101-4
Chaudhri I I, Shah B H, Naqvi N and Mallick I A. 1964.
Investigations on the role of Suaeda fruticosa Forsk in the reclamation of saline and alkaline soils in West Pakistan plains. Plant Soil 21(1): 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01373866
Chedlia B A, Bechi B R and Boukhris M. 2007. Effect of water deficit on olive trees cv. Chemlali under field conditions in arid region in Tunisia. Scientia Horticulture 113: 267-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.03.020
Chhabra R. 1973. ‘Kinetics of absorption of chloride and phosphorus, their interaction and effect on growth and composition of tomato plants’. Ph D thesis, KUL, Belgium.
Duarte B, Santos D, Marques J C and Cacador I. 2013. Eco physiological adaptations of two halophytes to salt stress: Photosynthesis, PS II photochemistry and anti-oxidant feedback – Implications for resilience in climate change. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 67: 178–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.03.004
Ebercon A, Blum A and Jordan W R. 1977. A rapid colorimetric method for epicuticular wax content of sorghum leaves. Crop Science 17: 179–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700010047x
FAO. 2007. FAO Agristat. www.fao.org.
Flexas J and Medrano H. 2002. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C-3 plants: Stomatal and nonstomatal limitation revisited. Annals of Botany 89: 183-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf027
Flowers T J and Lauchli A. 1983. Inorganic plant nutrition: V3. Sodium versus potassium: substitution and compartmentation. (In) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. pp 651–681. New Series, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg.
Glenn E P, Brown J J and Blumwald E. 1999. Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Critical Reviews in Plant Science 18(2): 227–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689991309207
Herbinger K, Tausz M, Wonisch A, Soja G, Sorger A and Grill D. 2002. Complex interactive effects of drought and ozone stress on the antioxidant defence systems of two wheat cultivars. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 40: 691–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(02)01410-9
Jenks M A and Ashworth E N. 1999. Plant Epicuticular Waxes: Function Production and Genetics. (In) Horticultural Reviews, p: 23. Janick J (Ed).
Koca H, Bor M, Ozdemir F and T¨Urkan I. 2007. The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation, antioxidative enzymes and proline content of sesame cultivars. Environmental and Experimental Botany 60(3): 344–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.12.005
Kumar A, Kumar A, Lata C and Kumar S. 2016. Eco-physiological responses of Aeluropus lagopoides (grass halophyte) and Suaeda nudiflora (non-grass halophyte) under individual and interactive sodic and salt stress. South African Journal of Botany 105: 36-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.12.006
Lata C, Kumar A, Sharma S K, Singh J, Sheokand S, Pooja, Mann A and Rani B. 2017. Tolerance to combined boron and salt stress in wheat varieties: Biochemical and molecular characterization. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 55: 321-8.
Mansour M M F. 1998. Protection of plasma membrane of onion epidermal cells by glycinebetaine and proline against NaCl stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 36: 767-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(98)80028-4
Patade V Y, Suprasanna P and Bapat V A. 2008. Effects of salt stress in relation to osmotic adjustment on sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) callus cultures. Plant Growth Regulation 55: 169-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-008-9270-y
Rabhi M, Ferchichi S and Jouini J. 2010. Phytodesalination of a salt-affected soil with the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum L. to arrange in advance the requirements for the successful growth of a glycophytic crop. Bioresource Technology 101(17): 6822–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.097
Sharma D K and Singh A. 2015. Salinity research in India-achievements, challenges and future prospects. Water Energy International 58(6): 35-45.
Singh G, Bundela D S, Sethi M, Lal K and Kamra S K. 2010. Remote sensing and geographic information system for appraisal of salt-affected soils in India. Journal of Environment and Quality 39: 5-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0032
Singh N K, Bracken C A, Hasegawa P M, Handa A K, Buckel S, Hermodson M A, Pfankoch F, Regnier F E and Bressan R A. 1987. Characterization of osmotin: a thaumatin-like protein associated with osmotic adjustment in plant cells. Plant Physiology 85: 529–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.85.2.529
Singh R B, Minhas P S, Chauhan C P S and Gupta R K. 1992. Effect of high salinity and SAR water on salinization, sodication and yield of pearl millet – wheat system. Agriculture Water Management 21: 93-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(92)90085-B
Yemm E W and Willis A J. 1954. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochemical Journal 57: 508-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0570508
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.