Profitability and marketing behavior of cauliflower crop in Sonipat district of Haryana


458 / 209

Authors

  • AJAY KUMAR National Agricultural Higher Education Project, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-II, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012
  • ANIL KUMAR ROHILA National Agricultural Higher Education Project, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-II, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i9.83504

Keywords:

Intermediaries, Marketing efficiency, Price spread, Resource use efficiency

Abstract

India is the second largest producer of vegetables in the world next to China. The cauliflower, potato, onion, tomato and radish are the major vegetable crops of Haryana. The present investigation was carried out to study the cost structure, returns, resource use efficiency, price spread and marketing efficiency of cauliflower. Present study was conducted in Sonipat district of Haryana. From selected district one tehsil and two villages from tehsil were selected on the basis of highest area and 15 farmers from each selected village were interviewed. Thus, sample of
30 cauliflower growers were studied. The vegetable markets of   Sonipat district was purposively selected as these  are near to the main production area. While, Sonipat and Panipat markets were selected for the marketing efficiency. Ten intermediaries from each market were selected randomly making a sample of 20 intermediaries. The cost of cultivation of cauliflower was higher on large farms as compared to medium and small farms.The gross returns were found higher in medium farms as compared to large and small farms. The cost of production per quintal was lower on
medium farms and highest on large and small farms indicating that the medium farms are having economies of scale in production. The net income was higher on medium farms as compared to small and large farms in cauliflower.There was no difference in marketable and marketed surplus because of perishable nature of vegetable and farmers were hard pressed by their cash needs for post-harvest immediate sale. In cauliflower channel-I (Producer → Commission agent cum wholesaler →Retailer →Consumer) was more efficient as it ensured higher percent share of farmer in the consumer's rupee as compared to channel-II (Producer → Village trader → Commission agent cum wholesaler→Retailer →Consumer).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayoola O T, Saka J O and Lawal B O. 2009. Resource-use efficiency in dry season vegetable production. International Journal of Vegetable Science 15: 86–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260802508259

Lokapur, Sameer and Kulkarni G N. 2014.Economic production of vegetables in Belgaum district in Karnataka. International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics 5(2): 139–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IRJAES/5.2/139-142

Sidhu R S, Kumar S, Vatta K and Singh P. 2010. Supply chain analysis of onion and cauliflower in Punjab. Agricultural Economics Research Review 23: 445–53.

Singh M K. 2004. Economics of efficiency in vegetable business system of Mahakoshal Region in Madhya Pradesh (India). Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing 19(3): 3–9.

Singh, Kehar and Vashist G D. 1999.An analysis of production and marketing system of vegetable in Lamdagaon block of district Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. Bihar Journal of Agricultural Marketing 7(4): 377–89.

Wadhwani, Mukesh K and Bhogal T S. 2001. Economic analysis of production, post-harvest management and price behaviour of potato in western region of Utter Pradesh. Bihar Journal of Agricultural Marketing 9(4): 433–47.

Downloads

Submitted

2018-09-25

Published

2018-09-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, A., & ROHILA, A. K. (2018). Profitability and marketing behavior of cauliflower crop in Sonipat district of Haryana. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(9), 1419-1428. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i9.83504
Citation