Apis mellifera colony productivity and growth influenced by initial frame strength: Farmer's perspective

SUMIT SAINI; O P CHAUDHARY; VADDE ANOOSHA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v88i10.84240

Authors

SUMIT SAINI Research Associate, CIB and RC, Directorate of Plant Protection Quarantine and Storage, Faridabad
O P CHAUDHARY Professor, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 044
VADDE ANOOSHA Ph D Scholar (Entomology), Department of Entomology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125 044

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i10.84240

Keywords:

Apis mellifera, Brood, Colony growth, Frame strength, Honey

Abstract

Beekeeping is a very good source of extra income to farmer and a very productive enterprise for landless farmers. Under Haryana condition there is unanimity among farmers and beekeepers regarding no. of frames to be kept while the season of honey production is about to start. Keeping this problem of farmers' in view present study was designed and implemented during 2014-15 and 2015-16 under semi-arid conditions of Haryana. Thirty six colonies with initially three (5, 10 and 15 frames) frame strength, twelve colonies in each were equalized (in terms of brood and food reserves) and transferred to experimental site. Strong colonies (15 frames) were observed superior in honey production (885.9 inches²), brood rearing (488.6 inches² ) and pollen ( 129.2 inches² ) reserves followed by medium strengths colonies having honey area 544.0 inches² and lowest brood rearing and honey reserves ( 257.1 and 247.1 inches² respectively) was observed in weakest colonies. Surviving with low strength weak colonies was observed with high egg area proportionate with strong and medium colonies. Observations were recorded throughout the major honey flow season for all growth parameters, average sealed honey area was recorded maximum in February (520.4 inches2) and a dip was observed in March (41.2 inches² ) that is due to honey extraction and also due to end of honey flow season. Up and downs were observed in case of average total brood area but it keeps on decreasing after April and minimum on 31 May observation (286.8 inches² ). Strong colonies with 15 frames was recorded with high brood area as compared to 5 and 10 frame colonies throughout the season which clearly indicates superiority of keeping good strength colonies at the start of honey flow season.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2005. Annual Report 2004-05. All India Co-ordinated Project on Honey Bee Research and Training. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.

Beauchamp G. 1992. Effects of energy requirements and worker mortality on colony growth and foraging in the honey bee. Behavioural Ecology Sociobiology 31: 123–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166345

Bhusal S J, Kafle L, Thapa R B and Shih Ch J. 2011. Effect of colony strength on the performance of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in Nepal (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology 58(2): 435–47.

Bhusal S J and Thapa R B. 2006. Response of colony strength to honey production: regression and correlation analysis. Journal of the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science 27: 133–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/jiaas.v27i0.706

Chaand D, Sharma D, Ganai S A, Norboo T and Sharma S. 2017. Effect of colony strength on colony build up and foraging activity of Apis mellifera L. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5(6): 1369–73.

Chaudhary O P. 2014 a. Constraint analysis in beekeeping industry. (In) Proceedings of Workshop on promotion of honey bee keeping in Haryana, organized by Haryana Kisan Ayog, held at Panchkula, Haryana on 24 June 2014, pp 24-39.

Chaudhary O P. 2014 b. Present status of pests and diseases of honeybees, Apis mellifera L. in India and innovations in their management. (In) Proceedings of Workshop on promotion of honey bee keeping in Haryana, organized by Haryana Kisan Ayog, held at Panchkula, Haryana on 24 June 2014, pp 40-55.

Crane E. 1990. Bees and beekeeping science, practice and world resources. Heinemann Newnes, 614 p.

Delaplane K S, van der Steen J and Guzman-Novoa E. 2013. Standard methods for estimating strength parameters of Apismellifera colonies. Journal of Apicultural Research 52(1): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA/1.52.1.03

Dietemann V, Ellis J D and Neumann P. 2013. The Coloss Beebook, Volume I: Standard Methods for Apismellifera Research, Vol 52. International Bee Research Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.23

Eckert C D, Winston M L and Ydenberg R C. 1994. The relationship between population size, amount of brood, and individual foraging behaviour in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Oecologia 97(2): 248–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323157

Free J B. 1967. Factors determining the collection of pollen by honey bee foragers. Animal Behaviour 15: 134–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(67)80024-1

G Narendra K. 2015. ‘Determination of population dynamics of Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman, base level resistance to acaricides and hygienic behaviour of European honey bee, Apis mellifera Linnaeus’. Ph D (Agric.) thesis, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India, p 119.

Gąbka J. 2014. Correlations between the strength, amount of brood and honey production of the honey bee colony. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 70(12): 754–6.

Jevtić G, Mladenović M, Anđelković B, Nedić N, Sokolović D, andŠtrbanović R. 2009. The correlation between colony strength, food supply and honey yield in honey bee colonies. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 25(5-6-2): 1141–7.

Kumar J, Srivastava S and Kashyap N P. 1995. Effect of strength of worker bees on honey production in Apis mellifera colonies. Indian Bee Journal 57(4): 174–6.

Kumar Y and Singh M. 2000. Effect of colony strength and stimulant sugar-feeding on Apis mellifera. (In) Asian bees and beekeeping: progress of research and development. Matsuka M, Verma L R, Wongsiri S, Shrestha K K and Partap U (Eds). Proceedings of fourth Asian Apicultural Association International Conference, Kathmandu. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, pp 102–3.

Matheson A. 1984. Practical beekeeping in New Zealand. Government printers, Wellington, 185 p.

Neupane K R, Woyke J and Wilde J. 2012. Effect of initial strength of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) supered in different ways on maximizing honey production in Nepal. Journal of Apicultural Science 56(2): 71–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10289-012-0025-7

Ratneicks F L W. 1986. Effect of colony population size on the efficiency of nectar collection and honey production in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. M Sc thesis, Cornell University, 88 p.

Saini S, Chaudhary O P and Anoosha V. 2018. New improvised comfort frame was developed for measuring colony growth parameters in Apis mellifera colonies. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 26: 220–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0163.2018.00048.4

Seeley T D. 1989. Social foraging in the honeybee: How nectar foragers assess their colony's nutritional status. Behavioural Ecology Sociobiology 24: 181–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292101

Sheoran O P, Tonk D S, Kaushik L S, Hasija R C and Pannu R S. 1998. Statistical Software Package for Agricultural Research Workers. Recent Advances in information theory, Statistics and Computer Applications. Department of Mathematics Statistics, CCS HAU, Hisar, pp 139–43.

Szabo T I, Sporns, P and Lefkovitch L P. 1992. Effects of frequency of honey removal and empty comb space on honey quantity and quality. American Bee Journal 132(12): 815–6.

Verma L R. 1992. Beekeeping and pollination ecology of mountain crops. (In) Honeybees in Mountain Agriculture. L R Verma (Ed.), Proceedings of International Export Meeting on Beekeeping Development in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region, Kathmandu, Nepal, 21-23 June 1989. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, India, pp 69–89.