Dynamics and distribution of weed species in weed associations


226 / 142

Authors

  • PLAMEN MARINOV-SERAFIMOV
  • IRENA GOLUBINOVA
  • VILINANA VASILEVA

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i1.86187

Keywords:

Diversity, Forage crops, Richness, Shannon-Wiener index, Weeds species

Abstract

Dynamics of weed density with a natural background of weeds in agrophytocenoses of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.), birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), pure grown (100%) and in mixtures with cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) (50:50%) and sown under a cover of pea (Pisum sativum L.) were tested in field trial in the Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven, Bulgaria. It was found that the weed infestance and species composition changed depending on the type of еdificator. The species composition in weed associations was the highest in pure grown Lotus corniculatus L. In mixtures of Onobrychis sativa L. + Dactylis glomerata L. the highest weed infestance was recorded, and the lowest in Onobrychis sativa L. under cover of Pisum sativum L. Weed infestance in mixtures was lower as compared to pure grown swards, except Medicago sativa L. + Dactylis
glomerata L. For the specific environment of study the highest part for annual dicotyledonous weed species (from 0.0 to 49.5%), followed by perennial dicotyledonous (from 3.7 to 58.2%) was obsereved. There was a strong variation in the percentage in agrophytocenoses of Convolvulus arvensis L. (from 0.0 to 11.4%), Sonchus arvensis L. (from 0.0 to 19.0%) and Erigeron canadensis L. (from 0.0 to 47.8%), whereas Matricaria recutita L. varied within narrow range (0.0 to 3.7%). The dependance allows to be used for developing more effective weed control systems in the studied forage crops and mixtures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Begon M, Harper J and Townsend C. 1996. Ecology: Individuals, Populations, and Communities, 3rd edition. Blackwell Science Ltd, Cambridge, MA.

Carbonero C H, Mueller-Harvey I, Brown T A and Smith L. 2011. Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia): a beneficial forage legume. Plant Genetic Resources 9 (1): 70–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262110000328

Derksen D A, Anderson R L, Blackshaw R E and Maxwell B. 2002. Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 94 (2): 174–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.1740

Dimitrova T. 2005. Study of weed control of alfalfa grown alone and in mixed crops. Plant Science 42 (5): 461–8.

Dimitrova T. 2010a. On the problem of weeds and their control in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Agricultural Science 43 (3): 22–9. (in Bulgarian)

Dimitrova T. 2010b. On the problem of weeds and their control in seed production of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). Herbologia 11 (1): 47–57.

Djurdjević L, Mitrović M, Pavlović P, Gajić G and Kostić O. 2006. Phenolic acids as bioindicators of fly ash deposit revegetation. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 50 (4): 488–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-005-0071-2

Dong X N, Gao C F, Li W Y and Zhang X P. 2009. Study on allelopathy of Medicago sativa root aqueous extracts to Dactylis glomerata. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi 7: 25.

Harker K, Blackshaw R and Clayton G. 2001. Timing weed removal in field pea (Pisum sativum). Weed Technology 15 (2): 277–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0277:TWRIFP]2.0.CO;2

Hartzler B. 2000. Weed population dynamics.(In) Integrated Crop Management Conference, Nov. 29–30, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-675

Hassannejad S and Ghafarbi S P. 2014. Weed flora survey in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) fields of Shabestar (northwest of Iran). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 60 (7): 971–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.859383

Hijano N, Monquero P A, Munhoz W S and Gusmao M R. 2013. Herbicide selectivity in alfalfa crops. Planta Daninha 31 (4): 903–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582013000400017

Hiltbrunner J, Liedgens M, Bloch L, Stamp P and Streit B. 2007. Legume cover crops as living mulches for winter wheat: components of biomass and the control of weeds. European Journal of Agronomy 26 (1): 21–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.08.002

Jaskulski D and Jaskulska I. 2012. Plant diversity in agroecosystems and agricultural landscapes. A L (Ed.). Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in a Diverse World, Chapter 1 TechOpen Gbolagade. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/47729

Jastrzębska M, Jastrzębski W P, Hołdyński C Z and Kostrzewska M K. 2013. Weed species diversity in organic and integrated farming systems. Acta Agrobotanica 66 (3): 113–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2013.045

Korolova J, Lapinsh D and Berzinsh A. 2006. Weed dynamics in differently managed fields. Agronomy Research 4 (special issue): 241–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(06)00544-X

Liebman M and Davis A S. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Research 40: 27–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00164.x

Lososova Z, Chytry M and Kuehn I. 2008. Plant attributes determining the regional abundance of weeds on central European arable land. Journal of Biogeography 35 (1): 177–87.

Luscher A, Mueller-Harvey I, Soussana J F, Rees R M and Peyraud J L. 2014. Potential of legume-based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass and Forage Science 69: 206–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12124

Meiss H, Le Lagadec L, Munier-Jolain N, Waldhardt R and Petit S. 2010. Weed seed predation increases with vegetation cover in perennial forage crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 138 (1): 10–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.03.009

Pacanoski Z, Týr S and Vereš T. 2017. Weed control in dormant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) with active ingredients metribuzin, imazetapyr and pronamide. Journal of Central European Agriculture 18 (1): 42–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/18.1.1865

Petit S, Boursault A, Le Guilloux M, Munier-Jolain N and Reboud X. 2011. Weeds in agricultural landscapes. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 31 (2): 309–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010020

Porqueddu C, Parenteand G and Elsaesser M. 2003. Potential of grasslands. Grassland Science in Europe 8: 11–20.

Saatkamp A. 2011. Population dynamics and functional traits of annual plants – A comparative study on how rare and common arable weeds persist in agroecosystems. Ph D dissertation, Universität Regensburg, Germany, 20 p.

San Emeterio L, Arroyo A and Canals R M. 2004. Allelopathic potential of Lolium rigidum Gaud. on the early growth of three associated pasture species. Grass and Forage Science 59 (2): 107–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2004.00410.x

Schoofs A M and Entz M H. 2000. Influence of annual forages on weed dynamics in a cropping system. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 80 (1): 187–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/P98-098

Storkey J and Westbury D B. 2007. Managing arable weeds for biodiversity. Pest Management Science 63 (6): 517–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1375

Downloads

Submitted

2019-01-17

Published

2019-01-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MARINOV-SERAFIMOV, P., GOLUBINOVA, I., & VASILEVA, V. (2019). Dynamics and distribution of weed species in weed associations. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(1), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i1.86187
Citation