In-silico analysis of WRKY Transcription Factors gene family in healthy and malformed stages of mango (Mangifera indica)
236 / 341
Keywords:
Cis-regulatory element, Defense, In-silico, Motif, Orthologs, PhylogeneticAbstract
WRKY proteins play crucial roles in plant defense regulatory networks, development process and physiological programs including responses to several biotic and abiotic stresses. Evalutionary analysis revealed, WRKY genes were categorized into the four major groups. In developed phylogenetic tree, group-D contain highest number (15) of WRKY genes followed by group-B (10), group-A (7), and group-C (6). Several number of CRE’s were identified from mango transcriptome belonging to different categories like light responsiveness, hormone responsive, bioticstress responsive, biotic stress responsive, binding, plant development, transcription and circadian control. Among the
10 stable genes observed in transcriptome, nine genes had negative Z-score indicating that these structures identified
for the proteins are reliable. Motif analysis indicated that the per cent occurrence of all the five motifs were higher in WRKY genes of malformed tissues compared to WRKY genes of healthy tissues. The uniquely identified CRE’s (Healthy stages: AC-II, GCC box, OBP; Malformed stages: Aux-RR-core, AC-I, 3-AF1 binding site, CAT-box, MNF1 and rbcS-CMA7a.), defense and stress responsiveness (TC-rich repeats) and fungal elicitor (Box-W1) related cis-regulatory elements will provide insight to solve the problem of mango malformation. The identified information regarding the WRKY Transcription Factor from mango transcriptome will serve as a valuable information for mango breeding against malformation.
Downloads
References
Blekas K, Fotiadis D I and Likas A. 2005. Motif-based protein sequence classification using neural networks. Journal of Computational Biology 12: 64–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2005.12.64
Bockus W W, Bowden R L, Hunger R M, Morrill W L, Murray T D and Smiley R W. 2007. Compendium of Wheat Diseases and Insects, 3rd Edition. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.
Broin P Ó, Smith T J and Golden A A. 2015. Alignment-free clustering of transcription factor binding motifs using a genetic-k-medoids approach. BMC Bioinformatics 16:22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0450-2
Crasto C J. 2010. Hydrophobicity profiles in G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane helical domains. Journal of Receptor, Ligand and Channel Research: 123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JRLCR.S14437
Eser E M, Arslan B R and Sezerman U O. 2013. Classification of cohesin family using class specific motifs. (In) Health Informatics and Bioinformatics (HIBIT), 8th International Symposium on 25 Sep 2013 IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HIBIT.2013.6661687
Eulgem T, Rushton P J, Robatzek S and Somssich I E. 2000. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends in Plant Science 5(5): 199–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01600-9
Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A Duvaud S, Wilkins M R, Appel R D and Bairoch A. 2005. Protein Identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy Server. (In) The Proteomics Protocols Handbook, pp 571–60. John M. Walker (Ed). Humana Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-890-0:571
Huang X, Li K, Xu X, Yao Z, Jin C. and Zhang S. 2015. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in white pear (Pyrusbret schneideri) reveals evolution and patterns under drought stress. BMC genomics 16(1): 1104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2233-6
Huber B R and Bulyk M L. 2006. Meta-analysis discovery of tissue-specific DNA sequence motifs from mammalian gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-229
Jensen S T, Shen L, and Liu J S. 2005. Combining phylogenetic motif discovery and motif clustering to predict co-regulated genes. Bioinformatics 21: 3832–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti628
Kaur A, Pati P K, Pati A M and Nagpal A K. 2017. In-silico analysis of cis-acting regulatory elements of pathogenesis-related proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. PloS one 12 (9): e0184523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184523
Kumar P, Misra A K and Modi D R. 2011.Current status of mango malformation in India. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 10: 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2011.1.23
Leonardi F and Galves, A. 2005. Sequence motif identification and protein family classification using probabilistic trees. (In) Brazilian Symposium on Bioinformatics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 190–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11532323_20
Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, Rouze P and Rombauts S. 2002. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 30 (1): 325–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.1.325
Li M Y, Xu Z S, Tian C, Huang Y, Wang F and Xiong A S. 2016. Genomic identification of WRKY transcription factors in carrot (Daucus carota) and analysis of evolution and homologous groups for plants. Scientific Reports 6: srep23101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23101
Ma S, Shah S, Bohnert H J, Snyder M and Dinesh-Kumar S P. 2013. Incorporating motif analysis into gene co-expression networks reveals novel modular expression pattern and new signaling pathways. PLoS Genet 9: e1003840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003840
Mallikarjuna M G, Nepolean T, Mittal S, Hossain F, Bhat J S, Manjaiah K M, Marla S, Mithra A C, Agrawal P K, Rao A R and Gupta H S. 2016. In-silico characterisation and comparative mapping of yellow stripe like transporters in five grass species. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86: 621–7.
Martinez E. 2002. Multi-protein complexes in eukaryotic gene transcription. Plant Molecular Biology 50 (6): 925–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021258713850
Mishra A K, Pandey B, Tyagi C, Chakraborty O, Kumar A and Jain A K. 2015. Structural and functional analysis of chitinase gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics 52: 169–78.
Ortuno F M, Valenzuela O, Pomares H, Rojas F, Florido J P, Urquiza J M and Rojas I. 2013. Predicting the accuracy of multiple sequence alignment algorithms by using computational intelligent techniques. Nucleic Acids Research 41: e26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks919
Okonechnikov K, Golosova O, Fursov M and UGENE team. 2012. Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics 28(8): 1166–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091
Ronquist F and Huelsenbeck J P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
Prajapat R, Marwal A and Gaur R K. 2014. Recognition of errors in the refinement and validation of three-dimensional structures of AC1 proteins of begomovirus strains by using ProSA-Web. Journal of Viruses. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/752656
Rushton P J, Somssich I E and Ringler P. 2010. WRKY transcription factors. Trends in Plant Science 15 (5): 247–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.006
Sahay A and Shakya M. 2010. In silico analysis and homology modelling of antioxidant proteins of spinach. J. Proteomics Bioinform 3: 148–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/jpb.1000134
Sivan S, Filo O and Siegelmann H. 2007. Application of expert networks for predicting proteins secondary structure. Biomolecular Engineering 24: 237–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeng.2006.12.001
Stewart Jr C N. 2016. Plant Biotechnology and Genetics: Principles, Techniques and Applications, p 432. John Wiley & Sons.
Timothy L B, James J, Charles E G and William S N. 2015. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Research 43 (W1): W39–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv416
Zhang C, Wang D, Yang C, Kong N, Shi Z, Zhao P, Nan Y, Nie T, Wang R, Ma H and Chen Q. 2017. Genome-wide identification of the potato WRKY transcription factor family. PloS one 12 (7): e0181573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181573
Zhang S, Su W and Yang J. 2009. ARCS-Motif: discovering correlated motifs from unaligned biological sequences. Bioinformatics 25: 183–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn609
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.