Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations


743 / 442

Authors

  • M D PARIHAR Junior Agronomist, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU), Hisar 125 004
  • C M PARIHAR Scientist, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU), Hisar 125 004
  • R K NANWAL Ex-Professor, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU), Hisar 125 004
  • A K SINGH Principal Scientist, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU), Hisar 125 004
  • S L JAT Scientist, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU), Hisar 125 004
  • H S NAYAK M.Sc Scholar, ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research (IIMR), New Delhi 110 012
  • P C GHASAL Scientist, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram
  • H R JEWLIA Senior Research Fellow, ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research (IIMR), New Delhi
  • M CHOUDHARY Scientist, ICARIGFRI, Jhansi
  • M L JAT Cropping System Agronomist, CIMMYT, New Delhi.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i2.87100

Keywords:

Conservation agriculture, Cropping systems, Net returns, Soil moisture Soil temperature

Abstract

In recent years, increasing water and labor scarcity & production cost, decreasing farm profitability and climatechange- induced variability are major challenges faced by the farmers of Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) in South Asia. Conservation agriculture (CA) based best-bet crop management practices may increase crop productivity, profitability and conserve the natural resources. In a 2-year (2012-2014) study, we assessed the effects of six combinations of tillage and crop establishment (TCE) and residue management options on crop & water productivity, profitability and soil thermal and moisture regimes in maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (MW) and maize-chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (MC) rotations in Western IGP of India. The treatments consisted of both crops sown on permanent raised beds with residue (PB+R) and without residue (PB-R); zero tilled flat with residue (ZT+R) and without residue (ZT-R) and conventional tilled flat with residue (CT+R) and without residue (CT-R). Overall, 2-year mean maize, wheat and chickpea grain/seed yield was found to be 17.0-23.2, 20.8-24.8 and 22-31.7% higher under CA-based PB+R/ZT+R than CT-R, but it was 5.3-10.9, 4.9-8.4 and 13.8-22.8% higher than CT+R, respectively. The yield of maize, wheat and chickpea was significantly (P<0.05) higher in CA-based PB+R and ZT+R systems compared to CT-R right from first year onwards. The MW and MC, 2-year mean system productivity (based on maize equivalent yield- MEY) was higher by 21.1-21.9 and 18.7-27.5% in CA-based systems (PB+R & ZT+R) than in the CT-R, respectively. CA-based PB+R and ZT+R practices reduced the total system water use in MW and MC rotations by 75-112 mm and 55-90 mm and resulted enhanced system water productivity (WP) compared to CT-R system. Irrespective of crop rotations and TCE practices residue management treatments enhances the soil moisture (in the range of 14.5 to 30.4% during winter and monsoon seasons) and also moderates the soil temperatures. Economic profit for MW and MC rotations was always significantly (P<0.05) higher (168-445 and 215-619 US$/ha/year) in CA-based systems than in CT-R. Findings of our study shows that MW and MC rotations under CA-based system is one of the way for improving crop productivity, WP and farm income with less risk of extreme temperature and moisture stress while sustaining the natural resources in Western IGP of India and other similar agro-ecologies of South Asia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aggarwal P and Goswami B. 2003. Bed planting system for increasing water use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown on Inceptisol. Indian Journal of Agricultural science 73: 422–5.

Aulakh M S and Grant C A. 2008. Integrated Nutrient Management for Sustainable Crop Production. The Haworth Press, Taylor and Francis Group, New York, 619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367803216

Bhushan L, Ladha J K, Gupta R K, Singh S, Tirol-Padre A, Saharawat Y S, Gathala M K and Pathak H. 2007. Saving of water and labor in a rice–wheat system with no-tillage and direct seeding technologies. Agronomy Journal 99: 1288–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0227

Blanco-Canqui H and Lal R. 2009. Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Critical Review in Plant Science 28: 139–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902776507

Gomez K and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Second Edition. An International Rice Research Institute Book., A Wiley-Inter-science Publication, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Govaerts B, Sayre K D, Goudeseune B, De-Corte P, Lichter K, Dendooven L and Deckers J. 2009. Conservation agriculture as a sustainable option for the central Mexican highlands. Soil & Tillage Research 103: 222–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.05.018

Jat M L, Humphreys E, Sharma D K, Sharma S and Ladha J K. 2013. Optimizing intensive cereal-based cropping systems addressing current and future drivers of agricultural change in the north western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Agricultural Ecosystem and Environment 177: 85–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.002

Jat R K, Sapkota T B, Singh R G, Jat M L, Kumar M and Gupta R K. 2014. Seven years of conservation agriculture in a rice-wheat rotation of eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia: Yield trends and economic profitability. Field Crops Research 164: 199–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.015

Kaschuk G, Alberton O and Hungria M. 2010. Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42: 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.020

Kumar V and Ladha J K. 2011. Direct seeding of rice: recent developments and future research needs. Advance in Agronomy 111(6): 297–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00001-1

Ozpinar S. 2006. Effects of tillage systems on weed population and economics for winter wheat production under the Mediterranean dryland conditions. Soil & Tillage Research 87: 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.024

Parihar C M, Jat S L, Singh A K, Ghosh A, Rathore N S, Kumar B, Pradhan S, Majumdar K, Satyanarayana T, Jat M L, Saharawat Y S, Kuri B R and Saveipune D. 2017. Effects of precision conservation agriculture in a maize-wheat-mungbean rotation on crop yield, water use and radiation conversion under a semiarid agro-ecosystem. Agricultural Water Management 192: 306–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.07.021

Parihar C M, Jat S L, Singh A K, Kumar B, Yadvinder-Singh, Pradhan S, Pooniya V, Dhauja, A. Chaudhary V, Jat M L, Jat R K and Yadav O P. 2016. Conservation agriculture in irrigated intensive maize-based systems of north-western India: Effects on crop yields, water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Research 193: 104–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.03.013

Parihar C M, Yadav M R, Jat S L, Singh A K, Kumar B, Pradhan S, Chakraborty D, Jat M L, Jat R K, Saharawat YS and Yadav O P. 2016a. Long term effect of conservation agriculture in maize rotations on total organic carbon, physical and biological properties of a sandy loam soil in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil a Tillage Research 161: 116–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.04.001

Saharawat Y S, Singh B, Malik R K, Ladha J K, Gathala M, Jat M L and Kumar V. 2010. Evaluation of alternative tillage and crop establishment methods in a rice–wheat rotation in north-western IGP. Field Crops Research 116: 260–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.01.003

Savva A P and Frenken K. 2002. Irrigation Manual Planning, Development Monitoring and Evaluation of Irrigated Agriculture with Farmer Participation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Sub-Regional Office for East and Southern Africa (SAFR), Harare. ISBN 0-7974-2315-X.

Sharma A R, Jat M L, Saharawat Y S, Singh V P and Singh R. 2012. Conservation agriculture for improving productivity and resource-use efficiency: prospects and research needs in Indian context. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57: 131–40.

Shen Y, Neil-McLaughlin, Zhang X, Xu M and Liang. A 2018. Effect of tillage and crop residue on soil temperature following planting for a Black soil in Northeast China. Scientific report 8, Article number: 4500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22822-8

Thierfelder C and Wall P C. 2010. Rotation in conservation agriculture systems of Zambia: effects on soil quality and water relations. Experimental Agriculture 46: 309–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447971000030X

Unger P W and Jones O R. 1998. Long-term tillage and cropping systems affect bulk density and penetration resistance of soil cropped to dryland wheat and grain sorghum. Soil & Tillage Research 45: 39–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00068-8

Van-Wijk W R, Larson W E and Burrows W C. 1959. Soil temperature and the early growth of corn from mulched and unmulched soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 23: 428–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1959.03615995002300060020x

Downloads

Submitted

2019-02-18

Published

2019-02-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PARIHAR, M. D., PARIHAR, C. M., NANWAL, R. K., SINGH, A. K., JAT, S. L., NAYAK, H. S., GHASAL, P. C., JEWLIA, H. R., CHOUDHARY, M., & JAT, M. L. (2019). Effect of different tillage and residue management practices on crop and water productivity and economics in maize (Zea mays) based rotations. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(2), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i2.87100
Citation