Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of HQPM 5 quality protein maize (Zea mays)


302 / 196

Authors

  • MANJU BALA Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004
  • CHANDAN SOLANKI Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004
  • ARUN KUMAR T V Scientist, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi 110 012
  • SURYA TUSHIR Scientist, ICAR-CIPHET, Ludhiana
  • RAMESH KUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i3.87590

Keywords:

Moisture content, Geometric dimensions, Physical properties, Quality protein maize

Abstract

This study on HQPM 5 quality protein maize was performed to investigate the effect of moisture content on the selected physical properties, as the knowledge about the physical properties of this grain is important for designing processing machineries. For this purpose, moisture content of grains was varied from 9% to 25%, wet basis (wb). In this study moisture content range, the average length, width, thickness, surface area, volume, geometric mean diameter and arithmetic mean diameter of quality protein maize grains increased significantly (P˂0.01) from 9.2476 to 10.2033 mm, 7.8684 to 8.2641 mm, 3.8572 to 4.7139 mm, 138.433 to 158.0703 mm2, 107.40 to 138.83 mm3, 6.6445 to 7.0822 mm and 7.1304 to 7.5485 mm respectively, with increase of moisture content. A nonlinear significant increase of grain sphericity from 68.7438 to 76.2248 was observed in the studied moisture range. Thousand grain weight, true density, porosity and angle of repose increased linearly (P<0.01) from 223 to 253 g, 1110 to 1290 kg/m3, 22.2087 to 34.4594 and 24o to 37.03o, whereas bulk density decreased linearly (P<0.01) from 982.4 to 812 kg/m3. In the considered range of moisture content, all of these physical properties exhibited moisture dependence according to linear relationships except the sphericity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altuntas E, Ozgoz E and Taser O F. 2005. Some physical properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graceum L.) grains. Journal of Food Engineering 71: 37–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.10.015

Bjarnason M and Vasal S K. 1992. Breeding for quality protein maize. Plant Breeding Reviews 9: 181–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650363.ch7

Deshpande S D and Ojha T P. 1993. Physical properties of soybean. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 56: 89–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1993.1063

Dutta S K, Nema V K and Bhardwaj R J. 1988. Physical Properties of gram. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 39: 259–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(88)90147-3

Krivanek A F, Groote H D, Gunaratna N S, Diallo A O and Friesen D. 2007. Breeding and disseminating quality protein maize (QPM) for Africa. African Journal of Biotechnology 6: 312–24.

Mohsenin N N. 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach, New York.

Nimkar P M and Chattopadhyay P K. 2001. Some physical properties of green gram. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Research 80(2): 183–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0664

Parde S R, Johal A, Jayas D S and White N D J. 2003. Physical properties of buckwheat cultivars. Canadian Biosystems Engineering 45: 3.19–3.22.

Pradhan R C, Naik S N, Bhatnagar N and Swain S K. 2008. Moisture-dependent physical properties of karanja (Pongamia pinnata) kernel. Industrial Crops and Products 28(2): 155–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.02.006

Prasanna B M, Vasal S K, Kassahun B and Singh N N. 2001. Quality protein maize. Current Science 81: 1308–19.

Qi G, Diao, Q, Tu Y, Wu S and Zhang S. 2017. Nutritional evaluation of quality protein maize (QPM) in animal feed. Protein Source for Animal Feed Industry: Expert Workshop and Consultation, Bangkok, 29 April–3 May, FAO Animal Production and Health Proceedings (FAO) Rome, Italy. pp 185–98.

Sahay K M and Singh K K. 1994. Unit Operations in Agricultural Processing. Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

Sharma S, Mishra D P, Kumar B, Kaur H and Jewlia H R. 2017. Genetic diversity of Maize (Zea mays L.) Inbred Lines Revealed by Simple Sequence Repeat Markers. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 6(12): 543–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.066

Shepherd H and Bhardwaj R K. 1986. Moisture dependent physical properties of pigeon pea. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 35: 227–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(86)80060-9

Singh K K and Goswami T K. 1996. Physical properties of cumin seed. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 64: 93–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1996.0049

Solomon W K and Zewdu A D. 2009. Moisture-dependent physical properties of niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.) grain. Industrial Crops and Products 29: 165–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.04.018

Vasal S K. 2002. Quality protein maize development: An exciting experience. Integrated Approaches to Higher Maize Productivity in the New Millennium. Proceedings of the Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, 5–11 February Nairobi, Kenya. pp 2–9.

Yalcin I, Ozarslan C and Akbas T. 2007. Physical properties of pea (Pisum sativum) grain. Journal of Food Engineering 79(2): 731–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.02.039

Downloads

Submitted

2019-03-09

Published

2019-03-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

BALA, M., SOLANKI, C., T V, A. K., TUSHIR, S., & KUMAR, R. (2019). Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of HQPM 5 quality protein maize (Zea mays). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(3), 463–468. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i3.87590
Citation