Assessment of conservation agriculture and intercropping practices for enhanced productivity and profitability in maize (Zea mays)
294 / 263
Keywords:
Intercropped maize, Nutrient uptake, Weed population, Zero-tillage residueAbstract
A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of tillage and intercropping on yield, net returns and weed density in maize (Zea mays L.) at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during 2010, 2011 and 2012. The experiment was conducted in split-plot design with three replications. In main plots, tillage systems, viz. conventional tillage (CT), CT + residues at 3 t/ha, zero-tillage (ZT) and ZT+ residues at 3 t/ha were taken. In sub plots, intercropping systems such as sole maize, sole groundnut, maize + groundnut (1:1) and maize + groundnut (1:2) were taken. The results indicated that ZT + residue at 3 t/ha recorded the highest dry matter (DM) accumulation in maize at all the growth stages except 30 DAS followed by CT + residue at 3 t/ha over the years. The yield attributes such as number of gain rows/cob and number of grains/grain row were recorded highest in ZT + residue at 3 t/ha followed by CT + residue at 3 t/ha. The residue retention at 3 t/ha in ZT enhanced 25.3-28.9% grain yield in maize compared to CT over the years. ZT + residue at 3 t/ha recorded the highest net returns (49.8 × 103 /ha) and B:C ratios (1.7) in maize. In 2010, weed population of broad-leaved weed (BLWs), narrow-leaved weed (NLWs) and total was recorded highest in ZT + residue at 3 t/ha. However, the population of BLWs and total increased in CT compared to ZT at the end of the study period. The intercropped system, viz. maize + groundnut in 1:1 and 1:2 recorded the lowest DM accumulation than the sole maize over the years. The number of grain rows/cob and number of grains/ grain row were recorded highest in sole maize compared to intercropped maize. However, higher grain yield and net returns was found in maize + groundnut in 1:1 and 1:2 than sole maize. The intercropped maize + groundnut in 1:1 and 1:2 recorded the lowest population of BLWs, NLWs and total during the years.Downloads
References
Ananthi T, Amanullah M M and Al-Tawaha A R M S. 2017. A review on maize-legume intercropping for enhancing the productivity and soil fertility for sustainable agriculture in India. Advances in Environmental Biology 11(5): 49–63.
Bhan S and Behera U K. 2014. Conservation agriculture in India- Problems, prospects and policy issues. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 2(4): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-6339(15)30053-8
Dass A, Shekhawat K, Choudhary A K, Sepat S, Rathore S S, Mahajan G and Chauhan B S. 2017. Weed management in rice using crop competition-a review. Crop Protection 95: 45–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.005
FAO. 2016. The sate of food and agriculture. FAO, Rome.
Hanway J J and Heidel H. 1952. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College Soil Testing Laboratory. Bulletin 57, Iowa State College of Agriculture, USA, p 131.
Mahdi S, Hasan B and Singh L. 2012. Influence of seed rate, nitrogen and zinc on fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in temperate conditions of western Hfimalayas. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57(1): 85–8.
Olsen S R, Cole C V, Watanabe F S and Dean L A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular 939, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC. Padole.
Rajpoot S K, Rana D S, Rana K S and Sepat S. 2014. Effect of methods of crop establishment on productivity and economics of Bt-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)–based intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 59(3): 489–92.
Sepat S and Rana D S. 2013. Effect of double no-till and permanent raised beds on productivity, profitability and physical properties of soil in maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(4): 469–73.
Sepat S, Behera U K, Sharma A R, Das T K and Bhattacharyya R. 2014. Productivity, organic carbon and residual soil fertility of pigeonpea–wheat cropping system under varying tillage and residue management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 84(3): 561–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0359-y
Sharma A R, Singh R, Dhyani S K and Dube R K. 2010. Moisture conservation and nitrogen recycling through legume mulching in rainfed maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 87(2): 187–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-009-9327-y
Subbiah B V and Asija G L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25: 259–60.
Walkley A J and Black I A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determination of soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Journal of Soil Science 37: 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.