Assessment of potassium status in soils under different land use systems of Assam


633 / 360

Authors

  • ANSHUMAN DAS PhD Scholar, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • D R BISWAS Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • DEBARUP DAS Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • V K SHARMA Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • RUMA DAS Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • PRASENJIT RAY Scientist, ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey & Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Jorhat, Assam
  • AVIJIT GHOSH Scientist, ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh
  • NILIMESH MRIDHA Scientist, ICAR-National Institute of Natural Fibre Engineering and Technology, Kolkata, West Bengal
  • S S BISWAS Scientist, ICAR-National Research Centre for Orchids, Dikling Road, Pakyong, Sikkim.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91646

Keywords:

Exchangeable K, Land use systems, Non-exchangeable K, Potassium pools

Abstract

The knowledge on contribution of potassium (K) from different pools become pertinent for evaluating soil fertility status and providing better interpretation in near future. The present study aims to assess the soil K pools under major land use systems of Assam, viz. mulberry, sugarcane, tea and rice-mustard under three depths (0-15, 15-30 and 30- 60 cm) and categories them, based on the content of exchangeable K (Exch-K) and non-exchangeable K (NEK). In 0-15 cm soil depth, Exch-K content was highest in the rice-mustard land use system (49.7 mg/kg) whereas, NEK content were highest in the mulberry land use system (1351 mg/kg). Both Exch-K and NEK content were found to be highest under mulberry system at 15-30 and 30-60 cm depth. Mulberry and rice-mustard land use systems had higher amounts of NEK but lower in available K, thereby, need maintenance dose of K. The NEK pools were included along with Exch-K in categorising soils into nine groups for evolving better strategies to manage soil K fertility. Results revealed that most of the soils were in category with low Exch-K and NEK content. Irrespective of depths, soils from nine sites were low in both Exch-K and NEK. The third category soils with low Exch-K and high NEK had the second highest number of soils in all the depths.Thus, soils having low levels of both Exch-K and NEK, the K must be applied immediately to sustain crop productivity under different land use systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bouyoucos G J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal 54: 464–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x

Das D, Nayak A K, Thilagam V K, Chatterjee D, Shahid M, Tripathi R, Mohanty S, Kumar A, Lal B, Gautam P, Panda B B and Biswas S S. 2018. Measuring potassium fractions is not sufficient to assess the long-term impact of fertilization and manuring on soil’s potassium supplying capacity. Journal of Soils and Sediments 18: 1806–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1922-6

Dhar A and Sanyal S K. 2000. Nonexchangeable potassium reserves and their release pattern in some Alfisols and Inceptisols of West Bengal. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 48: 741–7.

Epstein E and Bloom A J. 2005. Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives. 2nd Edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.

Ghorban A R. 2007. Trying a new potassium uptake model by wheat. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71: 125–32.

Hanway J J and Heidel H. 1952. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College Soil Testing Laboratory. Iowa Agriculture 57: 1–13.

Hasan R. 2002. Potassium status of soils of India.Better Crops International 16: 3–5.

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India (Pvt.) Ltd., New Delhi.

Mengel K and Busch R. 1982. The importance of the potassium buffer power on the critical potassium level in soils.Soil Science 133: 27–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198201000-00005

Ranganathan A and Satyanarayana T. 1980. Studies on potassium status of soils of Karnataka. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 28: 148–53.

Reza S K, Baruah U, Chattopadhyay T and Sarkar D. 2014. Distribution of forms of potassium in relation to different agro-ecological regions of North-Eastern India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 60: 507–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.800943

Sanyal S K. 2014. Potassium-the neglected major plant nutrient in soil-crop management practices. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 62 (Supplement): S117–S130.

Singh M, Dwivedi B S and Datta S P. 2012. Integrated nutrient management for enhancing productivity, nutrient use efficiency and environmental quality. pp. 55–67. Soil Science in the Service of the Nation. (Eds.) Goswami N N, Rattan R K, Dev G, Narayanasamy G, Das D K, Sanyal S K, Pal D K and Rao D L N. Indian Society of Soil Science, New Delhi.

Sparks D L and Huang P M. 1985. Physical chemistry of soil potassium. pp. 201–76. Potassium in Agriculture.(Ed.) Munson R D. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/1985.potassium.c9

Sparks D L. 1987. Potassium dynamics in soils. Advances in Soil Science 6: 1–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4682-4_1

Srinivasarao Ch, Vittal K P R, Tiwari K N, Gajbhiye P N and Kundu S, 2007. Categorization of soils based on potassium reserves and production systems: implications in K management. Soil Research 45: 438–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07024

Subba Rao A, SeshaSai M V R and Pal S K. 1993. Nonexchangeable potassium reserves and their categorization in some soils of India. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 41: 667–73.

Wang X B, Cai D X, Hoogmoed W B, Perdok U D and Oenema O. 2007a. Crop residue, manure and fertilizer in dryland maize under reduced tillage in northern China: I grain yields and nutrient use efficiencies. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 79: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-007-9113-7

Wang X B, Hoogmoed W B, Cai D X, Perdok U D and Oenema O. 2007b. Crop residue, manure and fertilizer in dryland maize under reduced tillage in northern China: II nutrient balances and soil fertility. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 79: 17–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9070-6

Wood L K and deTurk E E. 1941.The adsorption of potassium in soils in non-replaceable forms. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 5: 152–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1941.036159950005000C0026x

Downloads

Submitted

2019-07-17

Published

2019-07-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DAS, A., BISWAS, D. R., DAS, D., SHARMA, V. K., DAS, R., RAY, P., GHOSH, A., MRIDHA, N., & BISWAS, S. S. (2019). Assessment of potassium status in soils under different land use systems of Assam. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(7), 1077–1081. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91646
Citation