Tillage and brown manuring effects on soil properties and yield in Shivalik


389 / 382

Authors

  • R P YADAV Principal Scientist and Head, ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, New Delhi.
  • SHARMISTHA PAL Scientist, ICAR- Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chandigarh, Punjab 160 019, India
  • S L ARYA Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chandigarh
  • PAWAN SHARMA Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chandigarh

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91693

Keywords:

Brown manuring, Conservation tillage, Economics, Maize-wheat, Shivalik Himalaya, Yield

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the effect of tillage and brown manuring in sandy loam soil under maize (Zea mays L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) sequence. Six treatments implemented were Conventional tillage (CT); Deep tillage once in three years (DT); Conventional tillage with integrated nutrient management (CT-INM); Conventional tillage with brown manuring in maize + cowpea (1:2) and wheat + pea (4:1) ratio (CT-BM); Conservation tillage (CST) ; Conservation tillage with brown manuring (CST-BM). Maize equivalent yield (MEY) was 51.8% higher in CT-INM, over control; DT, CST, CST-BM and CT-BM produced 4.92, 14.1, 30.8 and 39.3 % higher yield over control (CT), respectively. The mean soil organic carbon (SOC) was 12.1, 11.3 and 17.7% higher under CT-BM, CST, CST-BM treatments, respectively, over the control (CT) in surface soil. Brown manuring in conjunction with both conventional (CT-BM) and conservation tillage (CST-BM) reduced soil loss to the extent of 91.70% and 93.32% as compared to CT. The highest net return per rupee of investment was recorded in CT-INM, being lowest in DT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhattacharyya R, Tuti M D, Bisht J K, Bhatt J C and Gupta H S. 2012. Conservation tillage and fertilization impact on soil aggregation and carbon pools in the Indian Himalayas under irrigated rice-wheat rotation. Soil Science 177: 218–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3182408f1e

Das T K, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, Sharma A R, Saharawat Y S, Bandyopadhyay K K, Seema S, Bana R S, Aggarwal P, Sharma R K, Bhatia A, Singh G, Datta S P, Kar A, Singh B, Singh P, Pathak H, Vyas A K and Jat M L. 2014. Conservation agriculture in an irrigated cotton–wheat system of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains: Crop and water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Research 158: 24–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.017

Ghosh B N, Dogra P, Sharma N K and Dadhwal K S. 2012. Soil erosion-productivity relationship assessment in sloping lands of north-west Himalayas. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 82(12): 1068–71.

Hinman H R and Esser A E. 1999. Enterprise budgets for summer fallow-winter wheat rotations and hard red spring wheat annual cropping, Adams County, Washington State, Washington State University Cooperative Extension Bull. EB 1883, Pullman, WA.

Khybri M L and Gupta O P. 1980. Methods of analyzing nutrients in runoff. Technical Bulletin No. 1, Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute (CSWCRTI), Dehradun, India, p 21.

Lal R. 2003. Global potential of soil carbon sequestration to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Critical Reviews in Plant Science 22(2): 157–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713610854

Loch R J. 1989. Aggregate breakdown under rain: Its measurement and interpretation. Ph D Thesis. University of New England, Queensland, Australia. Sharda V N, Dogra P and Prakash C. 2010. Assessment of production losses to water erosion in rainfed area of India. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65: 79–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.2.79

Sharma K L, Mandal B and Venkateswarlu B. 2012. Soil quality and productivity improvement under rainfed conditions-Indian perspectives (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/45870

Singh S, Ladha J K, Gupta R K, Bhushan L, Rao A N, Shiva Prasad B and Singh P. 2007. Evaluation of mulching, intercropping with Sesbania and herbicide use for weed management in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Crop Protection 26: 518–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.04.024

Walkley A and Black I A. 1934. An examination of the degradative method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Zentner R P, Lafond G P, Derksen D A, Nagy C N, Wall D D and May W E. 2004. Effects of tillage method and crop rotations on non-renewable energy use efficiency for a thin Black Chernozem in the Canadian Prairies. Soil Tillage Research 77: 125–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.11.002

Downloads

Submitted

2019-07-18

Published

2019-07-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

YADAV, R. P., PAL, S., ARYA, S. L., & SHARMA, P. (2019). Tillage and brown manuring effects on soil properties and yield in Shivalik. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(7), 1181–1184. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i7.91693
Citation