Evaluation of moving yellow sticky traps for monitoring and management of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci infesting cotton
330 / 189
Keywords:
Cotton, Intercultural operations, Whitefly, Yellow sticky trapAbstract
Yellow sticky traps (YSTs) are commonly used for monitoring whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), and are usually installed in the crop fields as a stationary unit. In the present investigation YSTs were evaluated as moving unit in association with intercultural operations for their efficacy in monitoring as well as management of whitefly under field conditions. YSTs were moved by different methods in the field along with various intercultural operations such as movement of YSTs attached by rod on either side of the power weeder so as to move just above the crop canopy, movement of YSTs behind two people who would move a rope through the plant rows so as to dislodge sucking pests making the adults stick to the YSTs, YSTs stuck on the pants of the plough operator in the portion just outer to the thigh, and movement of badminton racket covered with YST on both sides between two rows. These methods were compared with YSTs installed as stationary unit, chemical control as well as untreated control. Results of this study suggested that, among all the methods, YSTs installed as stationary unit trapped maximum number of adult whitefly (342±209/trap 24 h after installation) followed by YSTs attached by a rod on either side of the wheels of a plough so as to move just above the crop canopy (236. 95 ±111whitefly adults/trap). No significant correlation between whitefly populations observed on the plants and trapped on the YSTs. Minimal impact on the population dynamics of adult whiteflies was recorded, as YSTs were not able to significantly suppress the population of adult whiteflies when compared with the chemical control. However, YSTs were helpful in early detection of the infestation and minimizing population numerically in comparison to the control plot. Moving YSTs only gave additional advantage of being synchronized with the intercultural operations in cotton.
Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2015. GM Cotton: Whitefly attack raises anxiety among farmers. The Hindu 18 Oct, 2015.
Byrne D N, Rathman, R J, Orum T V, and Palumbo J C. 1996. Localized migration and dispersal by the sweet potato whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Oecologia 105(3): 320–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328734
Byrne D N, Von Bretzel P K and Hoffman C J. 1986. Impact of trap design and placement when monitoring for the banded winged whitefly and the sweet potato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environmental Entomology 15 (2): 300–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/15.2.300
Chandler L D. 1985. Flight activity of Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in relationship to placement of yellow traps in bell pepper. Journal of Economic Entomology 78: 825–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/78.4.825
Cytrynowicz M, Morgente J S and De Souza H M L. 1982. Visual responses of South American fruit flies Anastrepha praterulus and Mediterranean fruit flies Ceratitis capitata to colored rectangles and spheres. Environmental Entomology 11: 1202–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/11.6.1202
Gerling D and Horowitz A R. 1984. Yellow traps for evaluating the population levels and dispersal patterns of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 77: 753–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/77.6.753
Gillespie D R and Quiring D J M. 1987. Yellow sticky traps for detecting and monitoring greenhouse whitefly (Homoptera: Aleurodidae) adults on greenhouse tomato crops. Journal of Economic Entomology 80(3): 675–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/80.3.675
Gu X S, Bu W J, Xu W H, Bai Y C, Liu B M and Liu T X. 2008. Population suppression of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) using yellow sticky traps and Eretmocerus nr. rajasthanicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) on tomato plants in greenhouses. Insect Science 15: 263–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2008.00209.x
Heathcote G D. 1957. The comparison of yellow cylindrical, flat and water traps, and of Johnson suction traps, for sampling aphids. Annals of Applied Biology 45: 133–9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1957.tb00449.x
Hill A R and Hooper G H S. 1984. Attractiveness of various colors to Australian tephritid fruit flies in the field. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 35: 119–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1984.tb03371.x
Idris A B, Khalid S A N and Roff M M. 2012. Effectiveness of sticky trap designs and colours in trapping alate whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science 35(1): 127–34.
Jones D. 2003. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. European Journal of Plant Pathology 109: 197–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022839921289
Ladd T L, Stinner B R and Krueger H R. 1984. Influence of color and height of eugenol baited sticky traps on attractiveness to northern corn rootworm beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 652–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/77.3.652
Lloyd L. 1921. Notes on a colour tropism of Asterichiton (Aleurodes) vaporarorium. Bulletin of Entomological Research 12: 355–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300040220
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.