Energy budget of Jatropha-based cropping systems in Tarai area of Central Himalayas, India


308 / 126

Authors

  • AKANKSHA RASTOGI Research Associate, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi
  • VIR SINGH Professor, Department of Environmental Science, GBPUAT, Pantnagar

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i8.92850

Keywords:

Energy budget, Intercropping system, Jatropha, Mustard, Soybean, Wheat

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to work out energy budget of Jatropha curcas L. sown exclusively and intercropped with three food crops, viz. wheat, mustard and soybean, in Pantnagar University farm at Tarai area of Himalayan foothills during crop season 2017. The results showed that the energy use efficiency expressed as the outputinput energy ratio, was highest in case of wheat cultivated as a sole crop (6.76). When the wheat was intercropped with Jatropha, the output-input ratio declined to 4.20. Energy productivity (per ha basis) figures brought to the fore the fact that on investing one kJ the highest production was in case of wheat cultivated as a sole crop (18. 88×10-5 kg/kJ). The value decreased to 11. 74×10-5 kg/kJ in the Jatropha-wheat intercropping system. A trend of decrease in energy productivity of food crops in the Jatropha-based intercropping system revealed that these cropping systems were not favourable for harvesting more energy of useful production. Jatropha's own energy productivity (12. 40×10-5 kg/kJ) was comparatively lower than all the food crops raised as sole crops but relatively higher when the crops were raised with Jatropha. The figures of specific energy increased with the cultivation practice of Jatropha-based intercropping of food crops. The net energy values for wheat raised under both the systems surpassed the values for Jatropha and all other food crops. In case of each food crop, the values of net energy decreased on cultivation of the crop with Jatropha. We can arrive at the conclusion that the Jatropha-based intercropping is not a promising agronomic practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amaducci S, Facciotto G, Bergante S, Perego A, Serra P, Ferrarini A and Chimento C. 2017. Biomass production and energy balance of herbaceous and woody crops on marginal soils in the Po Valley. Bioenergy 9(1): 31–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12341

Demircan V, Ekinci K, Keener M M, Akbolat D and Ekinci C. 2006. Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta Province. Energy Convers Manage 47: 1761–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.003

GraamansL, Dobbelsteen A D, Meinen E and Stanghellini C. 2017. Plant factories, crop transpiration and energy balance. Agricultural Systems 153: 138–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.003

http://www. greencarcongress. com/2006/11/comparing_the_e. html Retrieved on March 21, 2017.

Mitchell R. 1979. The Analyss of Indian Agroecosystems. Interprint Publications, New Delhi, India.

Pandey U and Singh J S 1984. Energetics of hill agro-ecosystems: a case study from Central Himalaya. Agricultural Systems 13: 83–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(84)90030-1

Ralhan P K, Negi G C S. and Singh S P. 1991. Structure and function of the Agro-forestry system in the Pithoragarh district of Central Himalaya: An ecological viewpoint. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 37: 283–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(91)90079-D

Rastogi A, Singh K, Singh V and Arunachalam A. 2018. Energy flow through summer cropping in a mountain agro-ecosystem in Kumaun Himalaya. Indian Journal of Hill Farming 31(1): 193–201.

Sartori L, Basso B., Bertocco M and Oliviero G. 2005. Energy use and economic evaluation of a three year crop rotation for conservation and organic farming in NE Italy. Biosystems Engineering 91 (2): 245–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.03.010

Singh V and Partap T. 2002. Draught animal power in mountain agriculture: Management scenarios in the Indian Central Himalayas. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 7 2 (11): 1022–33.

Singh V. 1998. Draught Animal Power in Mountain Agriculture: Study of Perspectives and Issues in Central Himalayas, India. Discussion Paper 98/1. ICIMOD, Kathmandu. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53055/ICIMOD.278

Singh V. 2013. Animate Energy in mountain agriculture: women’s critical role in food production in the Central Himalayas. (In) Agricultural Communication: Opportunities for Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development. Singh V, Kashyap S K and Papnai G (eds.), pp 113–25. Biotech, New Delhi.

Singh V. 2019. Fertilizing the Universe: A New Chapter of Unfolding Evolution. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, London. 285 p.

Tamta P. 2010. Carbon and Energy Audit of Wheat Crop Cultivated Under Conventional and Organic Farming Systems. M Sc Thesis, GB Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, 78 p.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-08-19

Published

2019-08-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

RASTOGI, A., & SINGH, V. (2019). Energy budget of Jatropha-based cropping systems in Tarai area of Central Himalayas, India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(8), 1298–1302. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i8.92850
Citation