Soil potassium fractions under two contrasting land use systems of Assam


251 / 146

Authors

  • ANSHUMAN DAS PhD Scholar, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • D R BISWAS Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • V K SHARMA Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • PRASENJIT RAY Scientist, ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Jorhat, Assam.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i8.92870

Keywords:

Exchangeable K, Land use systems, Non-exchangeable K, Potassium fractions

Abstract

Potassium (K) plays an important role in growth, yield, quality, osmotic regulation, ionic balance and stress resistance of crops. Fertilizer application in Indian agriculture has remained largely skewed towards nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), while K remained neglected for over last five decades. On this background, the present study evaluates the soil K fractions under two contrasting land use systems, viz. rice-fallow and forest under three soil depths (0-15, 15-30 and 30-60 cm) and categorisation of soils based on exchangeable K (Exch-K) and non-exchangeable K (NEK) with the strategy for proper K management. Results indicated that the soils of rice-fallow land use system were present in a category which is low in both Exch-K and NEK and as a result it requires adequate K fertilization. Both Exch-K and NEK were higher in the forest soils as compared to rice-fallow soils in the three soil depths. The ratio of NEK/Exch-K was higher in the forest than rice-fallow land use system. The ratio was increased with increase in depth in the forest land use system which indicates that it has more potential to supply subsoil K in long term. This categorisation of soils into different groups provides a comprehensive assessment of K availability for different land use systems and better recommendation of K fertilizer for efficient K management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benipal D S and Pasricha N S. 2002. Nonexchangeable K release and supplying power of Indo-Gangetic alluvial soils. Geoderma 108: 197–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00124-6

Bouycous G J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal 54: 464–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x

Das A, Biswas D R, Das D, Sharma V K, Das R, Ray P, Ghosh A, Mridha N and Biswas S S. 2019a. Assessment of potassium status in soils under different land use systems of Assam. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences (in Press).

Das D, Dwivedi B S, Datta S P, Datta S C, Meena M C, Agarwal B K, Shahi D K, Singh M, Chakraborty D and Jaggi S. 2019b. Potassium supplying capacity of a red soil from eastern India after forty-two years of continuous cropping and fertilization. Geoderma 341: 76-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.041

Das D, Nayak A K, Thilagam V K, Chatterjee D, Shahid M, Tripathi R, Mohanty S, Kumar A, Lal B, Gautam P, Panda B B and Biswas S S. 2018. Measuring potassium fractions is not sufficient to assess the long-term impact of fertilization and manuring on soil’s potassium supplying capacity. Journal of Soils and Sediments18: 1806–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1922-6

Hanway J J and Heidel H. 1952. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College Soil Testing Laboratory. Iowa Agriculture 57: 1–13.

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India (Pvt. ) Ltd., New Delhi.

Sparks D L and Huang P M. 1985. Physical chemistry of soil potassium. pp. 201–276. Potassium in Agriculture. (Ed.) Munson R D. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/1985.potassium.c9

Srinivasarao Ch, Subba Rao A and Rupa T R. 2001. Need for inclusion of non-exchangeable potassium as measure in soil test calibration and potassium recommendations. Fertiliser News 48: 31–38.

Srinivasarao Ch,Vittal K P R, Tiwari K N, Gajbhiye P N and Kundu S. 2007. Categorisation of soils based on potassium reserves and production systems: implications in K management. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45: 438–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07024

Subba Rao A, Sesha Sai M V R and Pal S K. 1993. Non-exchangeable potassium reserves and their categorization in some soils of India. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 41: 667–673.

Wang H Y, Cheng W, Li T, Zhou J M and Chen X Q. 2016. Can non-exchangeable potassium be differentiated from structural potassium in soils? Pedosphere 26: 206–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60035-2

Wood L K and deTurk E E. 1941. The adsorption of potassium in soils in non-replaceable forms. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 5: 152–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1941.036159950005000C0026x

Zorb C, Senbayram M and Peiter E. 2014. Potassium in agriculture– Status and perspectives. Journal of Plant Physiology 171: 656–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008

Downloads

Submitted

2019-08-19

Published

2019-08-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DAS, A., BISWAS, D. R., SHARMA, V. K., & RAY, P. (2019). Soil potassium fractions under two contrasting land use systems of Assam. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(8), 1340–1343. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i8.92870
Citation