Species composition, diversity and traditional uses of homegarden in Kumaun Himalaya, India

VIBHUTI VIBHUTI; KIRAN BARGALI; S S BARGALI

doi:10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93479

Authors

VIBHUTI VIBHUTI Research Scholar, D S B Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand 263 001, India
KIRAN BARGALI Associate Professor, D S B Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand 263 001, India
S S BARGALI Professor, Department of Botany, D S B Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital 263001 (Uttarakhand), India.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93479

Keywords:

Floristic composition, Homegarden size, Plant utilization, Species diversity

Abstract

The aim of present study was to analyse the status, plant diversity and their utilization in homegardens of Kumaun Himalaya. After the recognizance survey, 12 villages were selected in Hill and Bhabhar regions and in each village10 homegardens were selected for detailed study. Out of 120 selected homegardens, 51 were large (>0.004 ha), 42 were medium (0.001-0.004 ha) and 27 were small (<0.001 ha). A total of 70 plant species belonging to 35 families were recorded. Herb density was maximum in large sized homegardens (479 ind./ha) followed by medium (317 ind./ha) and small sized homegardens (249 ind./ha). Tree density was maximum in large (825 ind./ha) as compared to medium (750 ind./ha) and small sized homegardens (317 ind./ha). Similarly, frequency of species occurrence increased with increasing homegarden size. Shannon-Weiner Index for both herbs (H'= 3.65) and trees (H' = 2.51) were maximum in the large sized and minimum in small sized homegardens. Among the usable components, vegetable shared the half (50.78%) of the total plant diversity followed by fruits (22.57%), medicinal plants (18.03%), fodder (12.21%), fuel wood (7.35%) and ornamental species (1.43%) across all the homegardens in both the regions. Mangifera indica, Artocarpus integrifolia, Litchi chinensis, Bohermaria olerosa were the most frequent and dominant trees in all sized homegardens. This study suggested that large homegardens are more efficient than the small and medium sized homegardensand are ecologically, socially and economically diversified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bargali K. 2015. Comparative participation of rural women in agroforestry home gardens in Kumaun Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology 6(1):16–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2015/16115

Bargali K, Vibhuti and Shahi C. 2015.Contribution of rural women in vegetable cultivation in homegardens of Nainital District, Kumaun Himalaya, India. Current Agriculture Research Journal 3(2): 90–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.3.2.01

Bargali K, Karki H, Vibhuti and Bargali S S. 2018. Contribution of homegarden agroforestry in livelihood of rural farmers in Kumaun Himalaya. Bionature 38(1): 34–47.

Bargali K. 2016. Traditional homegardens as a sustainable ecosystem for maintenance of biodiversity: A case study from Kumaun Himalaya, India. Journal of Biodiversity 7(2): 88–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09766901.2016.11884761

Bargali S S, Padalia K and Bargali K. 2019. Effects of tree fostering on soil health and microbial biomass under different land use systems in central Himalaya. Land Degradation and Development DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3394

Buchmann C. 2009. Cuban home gardens and their role in socialecological resilience. Humen Ecology 37: 705–721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9283-9

Curtis J T and McIntosh R P. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31: 434–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1931497

Cottom G and Curtis J T. 1956. The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 35: 451–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1930167

Das T and Das A K. 2005. Inventorying plant biodiversity in homegardens: A case study in Barak Valley, Assam, North

East India.Current Science 89: 155–163.

Kabir M E and Webb E L. 2009. Household and homegarden characteristics in southwestern Bangladesh. Agroforestry Systems 75(2):129–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9142-5

Kumar B M and Nair P K R. 2004.The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems 61: 135–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_10

Marglef D R. 1958. Information theory in ecology. General Systems Yearbook 3: 36–71.

Mueller-Dombois D and Ellenburg H. 1974.Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons.Inc.

Phillips E A. 1959. Methods of vegoetation study. Henry Hill & Co. Inc., USA.

Parihaar R S, Bargali K and Bargali S S. 2015. Status of an indigenous agroforestry system: A case study in Kumaun

Himalaya, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85(3): 442–47.

Padalia K, Bargali K and Bargali S S. 2015. How does traditional homegardens support ethnomedical values in Kumaun Himalayan Bhabhar Belt, India? African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines 12(6):100–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ajtcam.v12i6.10

Padalia K, Bargali S S, Bargali K and Kulbe K. 2018.Microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in relation to cropping systems in Central Himalaya, India. Current Science 115(10): 1741–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v115/i9/1741-1750

Pande P C, Vibhuti, Awasthi P, Bargali K and Bargali S S. 2016. Agro-biodiversity of Kumaun Himalaya India: A review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.4.1.02

Current Agriculture Research Journal 4(1): 16–34.

Samati H. 2004. Kitchen garden plants of Pnar tribe of Jantia hill district. Ethnobotany 1 (1&2): 125–130.

Srivastava R J and Heinen J T. 2005. Migration and home gardens in the Brahmaputra Valley, Assam, India. Journal of Ecological Anthropology 15: 20–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5038/2162-4593.9.1.2

Shannon C E and Weiner W. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communities. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

Shrestha P, Gautam R, Rana R B and Sthapit B. 2001. Home gardens in Nepal: status and scope for research and development.

Homegardens and in situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in Farming Systems. (Eds.) J. W. Watson and P. B.

Eyzaguirre. Proceedings of the Second International Home Gardens Workshop, Witzen-hausen, Federal Republic of

Germany, pp 105–24.

Simpson E H. 1949.Measurment of diversity. Nature. 163: 688. Vibhuti, Bargali K and Bargali S S. 2018. Effects of homegarden size on floristic composition and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in Central Himalaya, India. Current Science 114(12): 2494-2503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i12/2494-2503

Vibhuti, Karki H and Bargali K. 2017.Ecological ignorance in development raising disastrous possibilities, Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Home Garden Systems in Kumaun Himalaya, India, pp 55-69.

Vibhuti, 2018.Homegardens as a strategy for carbon sequestration: A case study from Kumaun Himalaya, India,’ PhD thesis, Department of Botany, Kumaun University, Nainital.

Tangjang S and Arunachalan A. 2009. Role of traditional home garden systems in north India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 8(1): 47–50.

Tynsong H and Tiwari B K. 2010. Plant diversity in the homegardens and their significance in the livelihoods of War DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09766901.2010.11884713

Khasi community of Meghalaya, north east India. Journal of Biodiversity 1: 1–11.