Improvement in yield and fruit quality of mango (Mangifera indica) with organic amendments


Abstract views: 264 / PDF downloads: 160

Authors

  • R A RAM Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 101, India
  • ATUL SINGHA Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 101, India
  • VINOD KUMAR SINGH Chief Technical Officer, ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 101, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93482

Keywords:

Actinomycetes, Cow pat pit, Mango cv. Mallika, Organic amendments

Abstract

A field experiment was laid out to observe response of various organic amendments on soil, plant nutrient status, soil microbial properties, yields and fruit quality parameters of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Mallika. Application of biodynamic compost (30 kg/tree), cow pat pit (100 g), BD- 500 and BD- 501 as soil and foliar spray for two years (2015-16) improved the soil organic carbon (1.20%) at 0-15 cm and (1.19%) at 15-30 cm soil depth, available N (168.93 ppm), P (27.67 ppm), Zn (3.78 ppm), Cu (14.78 ppm) and Mn (2.54 ppm) at 0-15 cm and organic carbon (0.98%), available N (151.20 ppm), K (200.85 ppm), Cu (9.46 ppm) and Mn (2.13 ppm) at 15-30 cm soil depth.Leaf N (2.35%), Zn (39 ppm), Cu (41.00 ppm), Mn (72.67 ppm) and Fe (256.0 ppm), total soil bacterial population (69.17 × 108) at 0-15 cm and (23.57 × 108) at 15-30 cm soil depth, actinomycetes (60.91 × 106) at 0-15 cm depth and (38.94 × 106) at 15-30 cm soil depth were also improved.Dehydrogenase activity, fluorescein diacetate activity, alkaline and acid phosphatase activity, in 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm soil depth were 4.57 and 4.09 μg TPF/g soil/h; 944.33 and 798 mg fluorescein/g/h; 136.37 and 86.56 μg PNP/g/hr and 70.01 and 80.26 μg PNP /g/h, respectively. Improvement in the yield (134.64 kg/tree), total soluble solids contents in fruit (24.93 0Brix), total carotenoids content (5.95 mg/100g), FRAP (60.03 micromole/liters) and DPPH (anti-oxidant) per cent inhibition (71.90%) was also recorded.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam G and Duncan H. 2001. Development of a sensitive and rapid method for measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33: 943–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00244-3

Brookes P C, Landman A, Pruden G and Jenkinson D S. 1985. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 17: 837–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0

Brookes P C, Powlson D S and Jenkinson D S. 1982. Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in the soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 14: 319–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(82)90001-3

Casida L E, Klein, D A and Santoro T. 1964. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science 98: 371–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004

Chandrashekhar P. 2012. ‘Effect of different resource conservation technologies on soil properties and productivity of cotton in vertisols’. M Sc thesis, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra, India.

Chu H, Lin X, Fujii T, Morimoto S, Yagi K, Hu J and Zhang J. 2007. Soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity,bacterial community structure in response to long-term fertilizer management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 39: 2971–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.031

Debnath S, Patra A K, Ahmed N, Kumar S and Dwivedi B S. 2015. Assessment of microbial biomass and enzyme activities in soil under temperate fruit crops in north western Himalayan region. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 1 (4): 848–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162015005000059

Fox C A and MacDonald K B. 2003. Challenges related to soil biodiversity research in agro-ecosystems-issues within the context of scale of observation. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83: 231–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/S01-059

Joergensen R G, Mader P and Fließbach A. 2010. Long-term effects oforganic farming on fungal and bacterial residues in relation to microbial energy metabolism. Biology and Fertility of Soils 46: 303–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0433-4

McLaughlin M J and Alston A M. 1986. Measurement of phosphorus in the soil microbial biomass: a modified procedure for field soils. Soil Biology and Biochem 18:437–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(86)90050-7

Ram R A and Verma A K. 2015. Energy input, output and economic analysis of organic production of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Dashehari. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85(6): 827–32.

Ram R A, Verma Anil, Gundappa and Vaish S. 2017. Studies on yield, fruit quality and economics of organic production of mango cv. Mallika. Organic e Prints 485–88.

Ram R A, Singh A and Bhriguvanshi S R. 2014. Response of on farm produced organic inputs on soil, plant nutrient status, yield and quality of guava cv. Allahabad Safeda. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84(8): 962–7.

Ram R A and Pathak R K. 2019. Indeginous technologies of organic agriculture-A review. Progressive Horticulture,

(1&2): 70–81.

Schnurer J and Rosswall T. 1982. Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 43: 1256–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.43.6.1256-1261.1982

Sparling G P and West A W. 1988. A direct extraction method to estimate soil microbial C: calibration in situ using DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(88)90014-4

microbial respiration and 14C labelled cells. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 20:337–43.

Sundara Rao W V B and Krishnan A. 1963. The effect of manuring and rotation on the soil fertilizer status and composition of barley crop in the permanent manorial series (A) at Pusa Bihar. Indian Journal of Agronomy 8(1): 345–57.

Tabatabai M A. 1994. Soil enzymes. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Microbiological and Biochemical Properties, pp

–833. Weaver et al. (Eds). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.

Uma M S, Jemima B M and Uthira L. 2012. Comparative study on antioxidant activity of organic and conventionally grown roots and tubers vegetables of India. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry 11(2): 136–46.

Vance E D, Brookes P C and Jenkinson D S. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19:703–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6

Wang S, Zhang W and Sanchez F. 2010. Relating net primary productivity tosoil organic matter decomposition rates in pure and mixed Chinese fir plantations. Plant and Soil 334: 501–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0400-8

Downloads

Submitted

2019-09-11

Published

2019-09-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

RAM, R. A., SINGHA, A., & SINGH, V. K. (2019). Improvement in yield and fruit quality of mango (Mangifera indica) with organic amendments. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(9), 1429–1433. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93482
Citation