Effect of varieties and nutrient management on quality and zinc biofortification of wheat (Triticum aestivum)


317 / 318

Authors

  • MOHD ARIF Scientist, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001, India
  • L N DASHORA Professor, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001, India
  • J CHOUDHARY Assistant Professor, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001, India
  • S S KADAM PhD Scholar, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001, India
  • MOHAMMED MOHSIN PhD Scholar, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93492

Keywords:

Beta carotene, Grain protein, Hectoliter weight, Sedimentation volume, Zinc concentration

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during winter (rabi) season of 2016–17 and 2017–18 at Udaipur (Rajasthan) to study the effect of wheat varieties and nutrient management on zinc biofortification. The treatments consist of four wheat varieties, viz. Raj 4120, Raj 4037, Raj 4079 and Raj 4238 in main plots and seven nutrient management treatments viz. 100% RDN, 100% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application, 100% RDN + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray, 100% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray, 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application, 125% RDN + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray and 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray in sub plots. The study of different wheat varieties indicated that highest values of yield viz. grain (5707 kg/ha) and straw (8869 kg/ha) yield; quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC); and nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw was recorded with variety Raj 4037 (on pooled basis). Further, application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield; protein content (13.77%), grain appearance score (7.87), hectoliter weight (80.98 kg/hl), sedimentation volume (46.97 CC) and beta carotene content (3.64 ppm); and nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw (on pooled basis).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akram M A, Depar N and Memon M Y. 2017. Synergistic use of nitrogen and zinc to bio-fortify zinc in wheat grains. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 6(4): 319–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.306698

Alam M S. 2012. Effect of sowing patterns and nitrogen rates on quality traits and yield of wheat. Journal of Environment Science & Natural Resources 5(1): 267–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v5i1.11591

Aref F. 2011. Zinc and boron content by maize leaves from soil and foliar application of zinc and boron deficient soils. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 7(4): 610–18.

Cakmak I. 2008. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant and Soil 302(1-2): 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9466-3

Cakmak I. 2010. Biofortification of cereals with Zn and Fe through fertilization strategy. Proceedings of 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil solution for a changing world held at Brisbane, Australia.

Chattha M U, Hassan M U, Khan I, Chattha M B, Mahmood A, Nawaz M, Subhani M N, Kharal M and Khan S. 2017.

Biofortification of wheat cultivars to combat zinc deficiency. Frontier in Plant Science 8 (281): 1–8.

Coronado F G, Poblaciones M J, Almeida A S and Cakmak I. 2017. Combined zinc and nitrogen fertilization in different

bread wheat genotypes grown under mediterranean conditions. Cereal Research Communications 45 (1): 154–65.

Haque A N A, Hossain M E, Hasan M M, Malek M A, Rafiil M Y and Shamsuzzaman S M. 2017. Response of yield, nitrogen use efficiency and grain protein content of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties to different nitrogen levels. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 46 (1): 389–96.

Kumar R, Rathore D K, Meena, B S, Singh M, Kumar U and Meena V K. 2016. Enhancing productivity and quality of fodder maize through soil and foliar zinc nutrition. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 50(3): 259–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.v50i3.10747

Kumar R, Singh M, Meena B S, Ram H, Parihar C M, Kumar S, Yadav M R, Meena R K, Kumar U and Meena V K. 2017.

Zinc management effects on quality and nutrient yield of fodder maize (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87(8): 1013–17.

Kumar S, Sohu V S, Gupta S K, Singh R P and Bains N S. 2018. Understanding the chapati making attributes of the Indian wheats – I: The physico-chemical basis. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 10(2): 572–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v10i2.1739

Kutman U B, Yildiz B, Oturk I and Cakmak I. 2010. Biofortfication of durum wheat with zinc through soil and foliar application of nitrogen. Cereal Chemistry 87 (1): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-87-1-0001

Mattas K K, Uppal R S and Singh R P. 2011. Nitrogen management and varietal effects on the quality of durum wheat. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2(2): 279–83.

Prasad R, Shivay Y S and Kumar D. 2016. Interactions of zinc with other nutrients in soils and plants - a review. Indian Journal of Fertilizers 12(5): 16–26.

Sardana V, Singh R P, Gupta S K and Chakraborty D. 2005. Influence of sowing time and nitrogen on productivity and

quality of durum wheat (Triticum durum desf.). Annals of Agricultural Research 26(3): 411–15.

Welch R M. 2005. Biotechnology, biofortification and global health. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 26(4): 419–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265050264S309

Downloads

Submitted

2019-09-11

Published

2019-09-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ARIF, M., DASHORA, L. N., CHOUDHARY, J., KADAM, S. S., & MOHSIN, M. (2019). Effect of varieties and nutrient management on quality and zinc biofortification of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(9), 1472–1476. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93492
Citation