Effect of high planting densities and cultivars on productivity of rainfed maize (Zea mays)


305 / 199

Authors

  • PERMENDRA SINGH Jr. Scientist, Advanced Centre for Rainfed Agriculture, Samba, Jammu and Kashmir 181 133, India
  • ANIL KUMAR Associate Director Research, Advanced Centre for Rainfed Agriculture, Samba, Jammu and Kashmir 181 133, India
  • VIKAS GUPTA Jr. Scientist, Advanced Centre for Rainfed Agriculture, Samba, Jammu and Kashmir 181 133, India
  • JAI KUMAR Jr. Scientist, Advanced Centre for Rainfed Agriculture, Samba, Jammu and Kashmir 181 133, India
  • BRINDER SINGH Advanced Centre for Rainfed Agriculture, Samba, Jammu and Kashmir 181 133, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93515

Keywords:

Economics, Growth, Maize, Planting density, Rainfed, Uptake, Varieties, Yield

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at research farm of Advanced Centre of Rainfed Agriculture (ACRA), Rakh Dhiansar SKUAST-Jammu, using factorial randomized block design (FRBD) with three replications to study the effect of planting densities on plant growth and productivity of maize varieties. The experiment consisted of two maize varieties, viz. Double dekalb and Mansar and six plant spacings of 40 × 15, 40 × 20, 50 × 15, 50 × 20, 60 × 15 and 60 cm × 20 cm. Varieties and planting density had a significant effect on plant height, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index (LAI) and yield attributes like cob length, cob girth, number of grain row/cob, number of grains/cob row, number of grains/cob, grain and stover yield. The variety Double dekalb attained significantly higher growth and yield attributing parameter values and grain/stover yield. Spacing of 50 cm × 20 cm observed significantly higher values of grain yield and yield attributing characters. However, 40 cm × 15 cm spacing achieved significantly higher values of plant height, dry matter accumulation, LAI and stover yields. Also the spacing of 50 cm × 20 cm exhibited statistically higher values of N, P and K uptake while 40 cm × 15 cm spacing recorded significantly lowest values of nutrient uptake. Among the varieties Double dekalb exhibited higher values of net returns and B:C ratio values while among the different spacing’s, 50 cm × 20 cm registered the highest net returns and B:C ratio values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2016. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Government of India, New Delhi.

Anonymous, 2017. Pocket Book of Agricultural Statistics. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Government of India, New Delhi.

Dawadi D R and Sah S K. 2012. Growth and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to planting density and nitrogen DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v23i3.4659

levels during winter season in Nepal. Tropical Agricultural Research 23(3): 218–27.

Jeffrey T C, Edwards P E and Earl D. 2005. Light interception and yield potential of short season maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids in the midsouth. Agronomy Journal 97: 225–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0225a

Jettner R, Loss S P, Siddique K H M and Martin L D. 1998. Response of faba bean to sowing rates in S-W Australia. I.

seed yield and economic optimum plant density. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research 49: 989–98.

Lemerle D, Verbeek B and Diffey S. 2006. Influence of field pea (Pisum sativum) density on grain yield and competitiveness with annual rye grass (Lolim rigidum) in S-E Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46: 1465–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04233

Manan J, Singh J Sharma M and Singh G. 2016. Effect of plant spacing on yield and yield attributes of maize hybrids. Journal of Krishi Vigyan 5(1): 41–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2016.00030.1

Nasir M. 2000. ‘The effects of different plant population on yield and yield components of different maize varieties’. MSc (Hons) Thesis, Deptartment of Agronomy, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Shafi M, Bakht J, Ali S, Khan H, Khan M A and Sharif M. 2012. Effect of planting density on phenology, growth and yield of maize (Zea mays). Pakistan Journal of Botany 44(2): 691–96.

Trenton F, Stanger S and Joseph G L. 2006. Optimum plant population of Bacillus thuringiensis and non Bacillus

thuringiensis corn in Wisconsin. Agronomy Journal 98: 914–21.

Valadabadi S A and Farahani H A. 2010. Effects of plant density and pattern on physiological growth indices in maize (Zea mays L.) under nitrogenous fertilizer application. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development 2(3): 40–47.

Zamir M S I, Ahmad A H, Javeed H M R and Latif T. 2011. Growth and yield behaviour of two maize hybrids (Zea mays) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10298-012-0030-9

towards different plant spacing. Cercetări Agronomiceîn Moldova 2(146): 33–40.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-09-11

Published

2019-09-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, P., KUMAR, A., GUPTA, V., KUMAR, J., & SINGH, B. (2019). Effect of high planting densities and cultivars on productivity of rainfed maize (Zea mays). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(9), 1513–1517. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93515
Citation