Acidulates performance for the better efficacy of rock phosphate in wheat (Triticum aestivum)


264 / 203

Authors

  • RAJEEW KUMAR Senior Research Officer, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 153, India
  • MAYA KRISHNA PhD Scholar, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 153, India
  • A BHATNAGAR Assistant Professor, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 153, India
  • D S PANDEY Professor, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 153, India
  • V P SINGH Professor, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 153, India
  • PRIYANKA PANDEY Assistant Professor, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 153, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i10.94581

Keywords:

Acidulates, Rock phosphate, Wheat

Abstract

Fixed plot field experiments were conducted at G B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during 2009–10 to 2012–13, to screen acidulates for better utilization of rock-phosphate in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acidulates used were gypsum, SSP, FYM, pressmud (PM) and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (PSB), in different ratio with rock phosphate. The experiment was conducted in RBD with eight treatments replicated thrice. Results revealed that RP acidulated with gypsum gave maximum grain yield (44.2 q/h) and straw yield (68.2 q/h) which were found significantly higher than the other treatments except pressmud acidulation. Plant height, spike length, number of fertile and sterile spikelet/spike and 1000 grain weight were found non-significant due to the treatments but maximum value was obtained with gypsum acidulation. Tillers and dry matter accumulations were also significantly higher in gypsum acidulated plots than the other treatments. Maximum soil available N was noticed in pressmud and PSB acidulated plot, which was found at par with FYM and pressmud treatments. Soil available P was found maximum in gypsum acidulated RP plots which was found at par with FYM+PSB acidulates RP and significantly higher than other treatments. In case of soil available K, SSP acidulated RP gave maximum value which was significantly higher than the other treatments. Nutrient uptake in gypsum acidulated RP was higher as compared to other treatments. Highest gross return (` 65678.3 h), net return (` 44504.5 h) and benefit:cost ratio (2.10) was also recorded in gypsum acidulates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chaturvedi Sumit, Kumar Rajeew, Bhatnagar Amit, Tewari Salil and Kausal Rajesh. 2011. Enriched rock phosphate as an alternative P-nutrition for improving wheat productivity and soil health in poplar + wheat system. Journal of Tree Science 30 (1-2): 54–9.

Chaudhary S K, Hasim Mohammad, Saquib Mohammad and Singh C B. 2017. Yield, NPK content and nutrient uptake of wheat as influenced by the application of acidulated rock phosphate. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 46(1): 187–94.

Chaudhary, Santosh Kumar, Kumar Rajeew, Singh A K and Kumar Rakesh. 2015. Effect of acidulated rock phosphate on growth yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Agriculture Research 49(6): 574–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.v49i6.6690

FAI. 2012. Fertilizer Statistics. 2011–2012. The Fertilizer Association of India, New Delhi.

Katewa M K, Sekhar D M R and Shaktawat M S. 2012. PROM Khad an efficient source of P to replace the costly chemical phosphatic Fertilizer. Nature Proceeding. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2012.6848.1

Saleem M M, Arshad M and Yaseen M. 2013. Effectiveness of various approaches to use rock phosphate as a potential source of plant available P for sustainable wheat production. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 15: 223–30.

Sharif M, Burni T, Wahid F, Khan F, Khan S, Khan A and Shah A. 2013. Effect of rock phosphate composted with organic materials on yield and phosphorus uptake of wheat and mung bean crops. Pakistan Journal of Botany 45(4): 1349–56.

Thakur D, Kaushal R and Shyam V. 2014. Phosphate solubilising microorganisms: role in phosphorus nutrition of crop plants- A Review. Agricultural Reviews 35:159–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0741.2014.00903.9

Verde, Benvindo Serafim, Danga, Benjamin Oginga and Mugwe, Jayne Njeri. 2013. Effects of manure, lime and mineral P fertilizer on soybean yields and soil fertility in a humic nitisol in the Central Highlands of Kenya. International Journal of Agricultural Science Research Vol. 2(9): 283–91

Yadav H, Gothwal R K, Sujata M and Ghosh P. 2014. Bioactivation of Jhamarkotra rock phosphate by a thermo tolerant phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Bacillus spp. BISR-HY63 isolated from phosphate mines. Archive of Agronomy and Soil Science 61: 1125–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.980239

Yadav Hemendra, Fatima Rukhsar, Sharma Ankita and Mathre Sujata. 2017. Enhancement of applicability of with phosphate in alkali soil by organic compost. Jorunal of Applied Soil Ecology 113: 80–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.02.004

Zhang H, Wu X, Li G and Qin P. 2011. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate-solubilizing fungus (Mortierella sp.) and their effects on Kostelelzkyavirginica growth and enzyme activities of rhizosphere and bulk soils at different salinities.Biology and Fertility of Soils 47: 543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0563-3

Downloads

Submitted

2019-10-21

Published

2019-10-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, R., KRISHNA, M., BHATNAGAR, A., PANDEY, D. S., SINGH, V. P., & PANDEY, P. (2019). Acidulates performance for the better efficacy of rock phosphate in wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(10), 1585–1588. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i10.94581
Citation