Effect of gum arabic and fruwash coatings on postharvest quality of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo)


231 / 132

Authors

  • PANKAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA Scientist, Horticultural Crop Processing Division, ICAR-CIPHET, Abohar, Punjab
  • RAM ASREY Principal Scientist, Division of FS&PHT, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi
  • AWANI KUMAR SINGH Principal Scientist, CPCT, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi
  • ELDHO VARGHESE Scientist, Fishery Resources Assessment Division, ICAR-CMFRI, Kochi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i10.94587

Keywords:

Edible coating, Firmness, Malondialdehyde content, Respiration rate

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out with the aim to find out the beneficial effects of edible coating on postharvest quality of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) under cold storage condition. In our experiments, different edible coatings, viz. gum arabic (5, 10 and 15%) and fruwash were used in order to minimize the excessive moisture loss during postharvest handling and storage. Among the treatments, gum arabic (10%) coating showed better colour retention in terms of Lvalue followed by fruwash treatment. Fruits coated with 10% gum arabic found best for minimizing water loss (more than 50%), respiration rate (≈21%) with higher fruit firmness (7.55 N) as compared with other treatments including control. After 12 days of storage, malondialdehyde content in 10% gum arabic treated fruits (0.141 nmol/g) was recorded significantly lower than control (0.183 nmol/g fruit weight). Highest proline content (235.05 μg/g fruit weight) was recorded in 10% gum arabic while, it was lowest (140.06 μg/g fruit weight) in control. Proline content was ≈68% higher in 10% concentration and ≈30% in 15% gum arabic treated fruit as compared with control after 12th days of storage. Overall 10% gum arabic coated summer squash fruits had better postharvest quality retention characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali A, Muhammad M T M, Sijam K and Siddiqui Y. 2011. Effect of chitosan coatings on the physicochemical characteristics of Eksotika II papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit during cold storage. Food Chemistry 124: 620–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.085

Al-Juhaimi F, Ghafoor K and Babiker E E. 2012. Effect of gum arabic edible coating on weight loss, firmness and sensory characteristics of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruit during storage. Pakistan Journal of Botany 44(4): 1439–44.

Base SAS® 9.3. 2014. Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, USA.

Bates L S, Waldran R P and Teare I D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060

Choudhary N L, Sairam R K and Tyagi A. 2005. Expression of delta 1-pyruline-5 corboxylate synthetase gene during drought in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics 42: 366–70.

Costa M L, Civello P M, Chaves A R and Martinez G A. 2006. Hot air treatment decreases chlorophyll catabolism during postharvest senescence of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var Italica) heads. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86: 1125–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2477

Eum H L, Kim H B, Choi S B and Lee S K. 2009. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis by nitric oxide in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit harvested at different ripening stages. European Food Research and Technology 228: 331–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0938-3

Hernandez-Munoz P, Almenar E, Valle V D, Velez D D and Gavara R. 2008. Effect of chitosan coating combined with postharvest calcium treatment on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa L.) quality during refrigerated storage. Food Chemistry 110: 428–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.02.020

Hodges D M, Lester G E, Munro K D and Toivonen P M A. 2004. Oxidative stress: importance for postharvest quality. Horticultural Science 39: 924–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.5.924

Hong K, Xie J, Zhang L, Sun D and Gong D. 2012. Effects of chitosan coating on postharvest life and quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) fruit during cold storage. Acta Horticulturae 144: 172–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.07.002

Ribeiro C, Vicente A A, Teixeira J A and Miranda C. 2007. Optimization of edible coating composition to retard strawberry fruit senescence. Postharvest Biology and Technology 44: 630–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.11.015

Srinivasa P C, Keelara V H, Nuggenahalli S S, Ramasamy R and Tharanathan R N. 2006. Storage studies of tomato and bell pepper using eco-friendly films. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture 86: 1216–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2472

Xing Y, Li X, Xu Q, Yun J, Lu Y and Tang Y. 2011. Effects of chitosan coating enriched with cinnamon oil on qualitative properties of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Food Chemistry 124: 1443–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.105

Yaman O and Bayoindirli L. 2002. Effects of an edible coating and cold storage on shelf-life and quality of cherries. LWT - Food Science and Technology 35: 46–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.2001.0827

Downloads

Submitted

2019-10-21

Published

2019-10-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KANNAUJIA, P. K., ASREY, R., SINGH, A. K., & VARGHESE, E. (2019). Effect of gum arabic and fruwash coatings on postharvest quality of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(10), 1604–1608. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i10.94587
Citation