Genetic studies in cucumber involving Cucumis hardwickii derived lines and gynomonoecious lines


495 / 275

Authors

  • A K SINGH Head, ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region Research Centre, Ranchi 834 010, India
  • R S PAN Principal Scientist, ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region Research Centre, Ranchi 834 010, India
  • P BHAVANA Senior Scientist, ICAR-RCER Research Centre Ranchi.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i11.95289

Keywords:

Cucumber, Cucumis hardwickii, Gynoecious, Gynomonoecious, Heterosis, Yield components

Abstract

The present investigation which aims to improve fruit yield and widen the genetic base in cucumber by use of Cucumis hardwickii derived lines and gynomonoecious lines was conducted at ICAR-RCER Research Centre, Ranchi during 2002–14. For this purpose crossing was initiated using a C. hardwickii line and cultivated cucumber. Simultaneously, gynoecious condition was transferred to the cultivated cucumber through an exotic collection EC- 399587. Five stable lines from each experiment were obtained after continuous selection and selfing was done up to 10 generations. Twenty eight crosses were made using the four gynomonoecious lines, three C. hardwickii derived lines and a collection from North East. Combining ability studies revealed predominance of non additive gene effects for number of fruits per plant, yield per plant, yield, node at which first female flower appears and days to 50% flowering. HACGM-3, HAC-158 and HAC-159 showed significant GCA effects for number of fruits per plant, yield per plant and yield. It indicated that the increase in number of pistillate flowers in gynomonoecious lines and sequential fruiting habit of C. hardwickii had contributed to the increase in yield and yield components. These genotypes are superior and can be used in cucumber improvement program. Based on SCA effects, hybrid vigour vis-a-vis mean performance and consumer preference, the crosses HACGM-3 × HAC-163 and HAC-160 × HAC-163 were found to be superior and can be directly utilized as promising hybrids. Multivariate analysis of the eight parents based on morphological data grouped them into two main clusters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arora R K. 1991. Plant diversity in the Indian gene centre, pp. 25– 54. Plant Genetic Resources - Conservation and Management. (Eds) Paroda R S and Arora R K. IBPGR Regional Office for South and South-east Asia, New Delhi.

Bisht I S, Bhat K V, Tanwar S P S, Bhandari D C, Joshi K and Sharma A K. 2004. Distribution and genetic diversity of Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii (Royle) Alef in India. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 79(5): 783–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2004.11511843

Chaudhary B N, Pilue, K, Taychasinpitak T and Sagwansupyakorn C. 2001. Development and maintenance of gynoecious lines of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Kasetsart Journal 35: 242 –50.

Choudhary H and Singh D K. 2010. Breeding potential of Indian germplasm of Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii for cucumber improvement. Acta Horticulturae 871(871): 409–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.871.56

Cramer C S and Wehner T C. 1998. Fruit yield and yield component means and correlations of four slicing cucumber populations improved through six to ten cycles of recurrent selection. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 123: 388–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.123.3.388

Dijkhuizen A and Staub J E. 2002. QTL conditioning yield and fruit quality traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): effects of environment and genetic background. Journal of New Seeds 4: 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J153v04n04_01

Griffing B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation diallel crossing system. Australian Journal of Biological Science 9: 463–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9560463

Gulam-Ud-Din and Nazeer A. 2002. Studies on combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Applied Biological Research 4(1/2): 31–8.

Hammer, Harper, D A T, and Ryan P D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 9.

Harlan J R. 1992. Crops and man. American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA.

Jat G S, Munshi A D, Behera T K and Tomar B S. 2016. Combining ability estimation of gynoecious and monoecious hybrids for yield and earliness in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86(3): 399–403.

Lower R L and Nienhuis J. 1990. Prospects for increasing yields of cucumbers via Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii germplasm, pp 397–405. Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. (Eds) Bates D M, Robinson R W, and Jeffrey C. Cornell University, Press, Ithaca. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501745447-034

Munshi A D, Kumar R and Panda B. 2006. Combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 76(12): 750–2.

Prasad V S R, Rai M, Pan R S and Singh A K. 2004. Combining ability and standardized potence in crosses between Cucumis sativus L. x C. hardwickii R. Indian Journal of Horticulture 61(2): 128–31.

Sandeep K, Ramesh K, Dharminder K, Nidhish G, Dogra R K, Mehta D K, Sharma H D D and Kansal S. 2016. Parthenocarpic Gynoecious Parental Lines of Cucumber introduced from Netherlands for Developing High-Yielding, Quality Hybrids. Journal of Crop Improvement 30(3): 352–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2016.1163762

Sharma M. 2010. ‘Gene action and heterosis studies involving gynoecious lines in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)’. MSc Thesis, C S K Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur.

Shushir K V, Dimbre A D, Patil H E, Kamdi S R and Saitwal V M. 2005. Combining ability studies in cucumber. Journal of Soil and Crops 15: 72–5.

Sreevani P G. 2005. Combining ability analysis for yield and yield and its components in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. Vegetable Science 32: 140–2.

Verma T S, Singh RV and Sharma S C. 2000. Line × tester analysis for combining ability in cucumber. Indian Journal of Horticulture 57(2): 144–7.

Wilde W J J O D and Duyfjes B E E. 2010 Cucumis sativus L. forma hardwickii (Royle) W.J. de Wilde & Duyfjes and feral forma sativus. Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) 38: 98–107.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-11-13

Published

2019-11-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, A. K., PAN, R. S., & BHAVANA, P. (2019). Genetic studies in cucumber involving Cucumis hardwickii derived lines and gynomonoecious lines. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(11), 1782–1786. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i11.95289
Citation