Agrarian change and well-being status of Mara tribe in Mizoram

D K PANDEY; H K DE; PRABHAT KUMAR; S K DUBEY

doi:10.56093/ijas.v89i11.95302

Authors

D K PANDEY Associate Professor, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University (Manipur), Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh
H K DE Principal Scientist, ICAR-CIFA, Bhubaneswar
PRABHAT KUMAR National Coordinator, Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-II New Delhi
S K DUBEY Principal Scientist, ICAR-ATARI, Kanpur

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i11.95302

Keywords:

Hill tribe, Northeast India, Shifting cultivation, Transition, Well-being

Abstract

This study is focused on the agrarian change and well-being status among Mara hill tribe practicing Shifting Cultivation (SC) in Saiha, a remote Hill district in North Eastern Region of India. Using a mixed methods research design, 50 tribal households were interviewed with the help of structured interview schedule. The findings reveal transition in terms of aversion of the tribal youths from SC, declining dependency of the community on SC and fare share (37.16%) of total expenditure on childrenâ€™s education. Further, increased access to information gadgets like mobile phone, TV and radio are triggering material aspirations among the tribal community. The average monthly income of respondent households was about ` 10766 and 77.56% of the total income is contributed by agriculture and allied activities. Higher inclination was observed towards settled cultivation with high value horticultural crops, however, community ownership of land, lack of market access and higher technological gap in agriculture were impeding entrepreneurship. The study reveals that well-being of 93% tribal households were moderate or inconsistent. They are experiencing difficulties as on date and are also expected to continue with it in the near future. Hence, planning and implementation of development schemes focused on welfare and livelihood diversification need to be revisited to enhance overall well-being of the hill tribe who rely on SC for their livelihood.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atkinson AB. 1998. Poverty in Europe:(Jrjo Jahnsson Lectures). Wiley-Blackwell. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States.

Bezu S, Barrett C B and Holden S T. 2012. Does the nonfarm economy offer pathways for upward mobility? Evidence from a panel data study in Ethiopia. World Development 40(8): 1634–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.019

Cantril H. 1965. Pattern of human concerns. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, Canada.

Census of India. 2011. New Delhi: Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India. http://censusindia.gov.in, accessed on 16/01/2017.

Diener E, Scollon C N and Lucas R E. 2009. The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness, pp. 67-100. (Eds) Diener E. Assessing Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_4

Fox J, Fujita Y, Ngidang D, Peluso N, Potter L, Sakuntaladewi N, Sturgeon J and Thomas D. 2009. Policies, political-economy, and swidden in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology 37(3): 305–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9240-7

FSI. 2017. State of Forest Report. Dehradun: Forest Survey of India.

Gallup G. 2009. World Poll Methodology. Technical Report. Washington, DC.

Heinimann A, Mertz O, Frolking S, Christensen A E, Hurni K, Sedano F, Chini L P, Sahajpal R, Hansen M and Hurtt G. 2017. A global view of shifting cultivation: Recent, current, and future extent. PloS one 12(9): p.e0184479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184479

Hoang T X, Pham C S and Ulubaşoğlu M A. 2014. Non-farm activity, household expenditure, and poverty reduction in rural Vietnam: 2002–2008. World Development 64: 554–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.027

Hyll W and Schneider L. 2013. The causal effect of watching TV on material aspirations: Evidence from the “valley of the innocent”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 86: 37–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.030

Lewis J. 2014. Income, Expenditure and Personal Well-being, 2011/12. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/455199/lewis.pdf, accessed on 12/7/2018.

Li P, Feng Z, Jiang L, Liao C and Zhang J. 2014. A review of swidden agriculture in Southeast Asia. Remote Sensing 6(2): 1654–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021654

Lohmann S. 2015. Information technologies and subjective well-being: does the Internet raise material aspirations?. Oxford Economic Papers 67(3): 740–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpv032

Nettle D. 2005. Socio-economic status and subjective well-being. Newcastle upon Tyne: New Castle University, U. K., England.

Rai P K and Chutia B M. 2014. Assessment of ambient air quality status before and after shifting cultivation in an Indo-Burma hot spot region. International Research Journal of Environmental Sciences 3(11): 1–5.

Schmidt-Vogt D, Leisz S J, Mertz O, Heinimann A, Thiha T, Messerli P, Epprecht M, Van Cu P, Chi V K, Hardiono M and Dao T M. 2009. An assessment of trends in the extent of swidden in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology 37(3): 269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9239-0

Tripathi RS and Barik SK. 2003. Shifting cultivation in North-East India, pp. 317–322. Proceedings on Approaches for Increasing Agricultural Productivity in Hill and Mountain Ecosystem. (Eds) Bhatt et al. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India.

Van Vliet N, Mertz O, Heinimann A, Langanke T, Pascual U, Schmook B, Adams C, Schmidt-Vogt D, Messerli P, Leisz S and Castella JC. 2012. Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers: a global assessment. Global Environmental Change 22(2): 418–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.009

Weaver F, Gonçalves J and Ryser V A. 2015. Socioeconomic inequalities in subjective well-being among the 50+: contributions of income and health (No. 15011). Institute of Economics and Econometrics, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

Zaitinvawra D and Kanagaraj E. 2008. Shifting Cultivation to Settled Agriculture: Rural Livelihood Patterns in Mizoram. The Eastern Anthropologist 61(2): 201–26.