Cyantraniliprole mode of action against Diaphorina citri and Papilio demolius in Citrus reticulata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i11.95334Keywords:
Bio-efficacy, Citrus psylla, Cyantraniliprole, Lemon butterfly, YieldAbstract
Anthranilic diamide insecticides are currently in use for pest management in many crops across the world. There was an urging pressure for a newer chemistry for the management of sucking and defoliator pests of citrus in India. Hence, field studies were conducted at ICAR-Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur to evaluate cyantraniliprole HGW86 10% w/v OD during 2016–17 as this molecule is not yet registered for use in citrus. The effects of cyantraniliprole HGW86 10% w/v OD (50, 60, and 70 g a.i./ha) along with two standards (Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 10g a.i./ha, thiamethoxam 25%WG @ 25g a.i./ha) against Diaphorina citri Kuwayama and Papilio demolius L. were investigated in the citrus orchards (> five years old) for two seasons. Application of cyantraniliprole @ 60g a.i./ ha and 70g a.i./ha were found to be significantly effective in management of citrus psylla (10.38 psylla/5cm twig) and lemon butterfly (2.68 larvae/plant), respectively. In addition, cyantraniliprole was found to be less toxic to predators in comparison to standards and thus may have less impact on biological control programmes. There was no phytotoxicity symptoms observed in treated plots. Percent increase in yield of 40.46 over control plots was recorded from plots treated with cyantraniliprole HGW86 10% w/v OD@ 70 g a.i./ha during the study. Generation of bio-efficacy data against different citrus insect pests will help to develop and integrate novel tools for the successful management of the pests and also to prevent the development of insecticide resistance. Based on the results of our present study, this new molecule can be recommended as an alternative for the increased usage of neonicotinoids against sucking insect pests of citrus to slow down development of resistance.Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2017. Dupont™ EXIREL™ insecticide, DFU Booklet, 36p.
Cordova D, Benner E A, Sacher M D, Rauh J J, Sopa J S, Lahm G P, Selby T P, Stevenson T M, Flexner L, Gutteridge S, Rhoades D F, Wu L, Smith R M and Tao Y. 2005. Anthranilic diamides: A new class of insecticides with a novel mode of action, ryanodine receptor activation. Journal of Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 84: 196-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2005.07.005
Fettig C J, Hayes C J, McKelvey S R and Mori S R. 2011. Laboratory assays of select candidate insecticides for control of Dendroctonus ponderosae. Pest Management Science 67: 548–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2094
Foster S P, Denholm I, Rison J, Portillo H E, Margaritopoulis J and Slater R. 2012. Susceptibility of standard clones and European field populations of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, and the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera:Aphididae), to the novel anthranilic diamide insecticide cyantraniliprole. Pest Management Science 68: 629–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2306
Gonzales-Coloma A, Gutierrez C, Hubner H, Achenbach H, Terrero D and Fraga B M. 1999. Selective insect antifeedant and toxic action of ryanoid diterpenes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47: 4419–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf990359a
Hardke J T, Temple J H, Leonard B R and Jackson R E. 2011, Laboratory toxicity and field efficacy of selected insecticides against fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Florida Entomologist 94: 272–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0221
Jacobson A L and Kennedy G G. 2011. The effect of three rates of cyantraniliprole on the transmission of tomato spotted wilt virus by Frankliniella occidentalis and Frankliniella fusca (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) to Capsicum annuum. Crop Protection 30: 512-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.12.004
Lahom G P, Selby T P, Freudenberger J H, Stevenson T M, Myers B J and Seburyamo G. 2005. Insecticidal anthranilic diamides: a new class of potent ryanodine receptor activators. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15: 4898–4906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.08.034
Li X, Degain B A, Harpold V S, Marcon P G, Nichols R L and Fournier A J. 2012. Baseline susceptibilities of B- and Q-biotype Bemisia tabaci to anthranilic diamides in Arizona. Pest Management Science 68: 83–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2227
Lodaya J P, Patel N B, Patel R D and Acharya. 2017. Bioefficacy of cyantraniliprole 10% OD W/V (HGW86 10 OD) against pests of potato. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(7): 309–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.036
Misra H P. 2011. Bio-efficacy of chlorantraniliprole against shoot and fruit borer of brinjal, Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee. Journal of Insect Science 24(1): 60–4.
Nadaf A M. 2017. Bioefficacy of newer insecticides against anar butterfly, Deudorix isocrates Fab., on pomegranate. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5(3): 1655–57.
Nayar K K, Ananthakrishnan B V and David B V. 1976. General and Applied Entomology, p 486. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd. New Delhi.
Patel R D, Bharpoda T M, Patel N B and Borad P K. 2014. Bio-efficacy of cyantraniliprole 10% OD – An anthranilic diamide insecticide against sucking pests of cotton. Bioscan 9(1): 89-92.
Singh S P. 1993. Species composition and diapause in citrus butterflies. Journal of Insect Science 6: 48–52.
Smith H A. 2013. 'Managing diamide Resistance in Florida Tomato'. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-in978-2013
Tiwari S and Stelinski L L. 2013. Effects of cyantraniliprole, a novel anthranilic diamide insecticide, against Asian citrus psyllid under laboratory and field conditions. Pest Management Science 69: 1066–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3468
Yadav D S, Kamte A S and Jadhav R S. 2012. Bio-efficacy of cyantraniliprole, a new molecule against Scelodonta strigicollis Motschulsky and Spodoptera litura Fabricius in grapes. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 18(2): 128-34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.