Energy budgeting of aerobic rice (Oriza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system as influenced by potassium fertilization

Authors

  • VIJAYAKUMAR S Scientist, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha
  • DINESH KUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha
  • Y S SHIVAY Principal Scientist, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha
  • V K SHARMA Principal Scientist, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha
  • D K SHARMA Principal Scientist, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha
  • SARAVANANE P Assistant professor, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru College of Agriculture & Research Institute, Puducherry
  • POORNIMA S Ph D Scholar, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • NAIN SINGH Technical, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i11.95341

Keywords:

Aerobic rice, Energy, Indo-Gangetic Plains, Potassium, System productivity, Wheat

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in 2015–16 and 2016–17 to estimate the energy budget of aerobic rice (Oriza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system (RWCS) as influenced by K fertilization. Results revealed that in aerobic RWCS the non-renewable energy and renewable energy shares 86% and 14% of the total input energy use respectively. Split application of recommended dose of K (RDK=60 kg K2O/ha) in both rice and wheat, at 50:50 or 75:25 ratio increased the system productivity by 8.2% over applying entire dose as basal (B). Among the treatments, T12 (150% RDK as basal) recorded the highest energy input (37481.5 MJ/ha), whereas T1 (control) recorded the lowest (35474.5 MJ/ha). Treatments T11 [75% RDK as basal + 25% at panicle initiation (PI) or ear initiation (EI)+ 2 foliar spray of 2.5% KNO3] recorded the highest output energy (340 ×103 MJ/ha) which remained at par with T4 [50% RDK as basal + 50% at panicle initiation (PI) or ear initiation (EI)], whereas the lowest was recorded in control (275.9 ×103 MJ/ha). Two split application of 60 kg K2O/ha at 50:50 ratio increased the system energy output by 5.5% and 13.5% over T2 (100% RDK as basal) and T3 (50% RDK as basal) respectively. Similarly, split application of potassium under T4 treatments increased the system energy use efficiency, energy productivity and energy profitability by 17.9%, 25% and 20.5% respectively over control. Thus in aerobic RWCS, 4R (right time, right dose, right method, right form) stewardship based K application ensure efficient utilization of input energy and maximize the production of biological energy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2017. Annual review of fertiliser production and consumption 2016-17. Executive Summary. Indian Journal of Fertilizer 97–9.

Arivazhagan K, Natarajan S and Surendran U. 2004. Effect of split application of different potassic fertilizers on yield and nutrient uptake by rice cv. PY5. Journal of Ecobiology 16: 175–80.

Awan T H M Z, Ehsan S M and Mushtaq A. 2007. Yield response of rice to dynamic use of potassium in Traditional rice growing area of Punjab. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 44(1): 130–5.

Bijay-Singh, Yadvinder-Singh, Patricia Imas and Xie Jian-chang. 2004. Potassium nutrition of the rice-wheat cropping system. Advances in Agronomy 81: 203–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(03)81005-2

Choudhary Mukesh, Rana K S, Bana R S, Ghasal P C, Choudhary G L, Praveen Jakhar and Rakesh Verma. 2017. Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of pearl millet – Mustard cropping system under conventional and conservation agriculture in rainfed semi-arid agro-ecosystem. Energy 141: 1052–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.136

Esengun K, Erdal G, Gündüz O and Erdal H. 2007. An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey. Renewable Energy 32: 1873–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.07.005

Jackson T M, Khan S and Hafeez M A. 2010. Comparative analysis of water application and energy consumption at the irrigated field level. Agricultural Water Management 97: 1477–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.04.013

Mandal K G, Saha K P, Gosh P L, Hati K M and Bandyopadhyay K K. 2002. Bioenergy and economic analyses of soybean-based crop production systems in central India. Biomass Bioenergy 23: 337–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00058-2

Mohammadi A, Rafiee S H, Mohtasebi S and Rafiee H. 2010. Energy inputs-yield relationship and cost analysis of kiwifruit production in Iran. Renewable Energy 35: 1071–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.09.004

Paramesh V, Ravisankar N, Bappa Das, Viswanatha Reddy K and Narendra Pratap Singh. 2017. Energy budgeting and sensitivity analysis of rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in Indo-gangentic Plains of India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 6(3): 1534–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.176

Safa M and Tabatabaeefar A. 2002. Energy consumption in wheat production in irrigated and dry land farming. (In) Proceedings International Agricultural Engineering Conference Wuxi, China, 2002, November 28–30.

Singh A K and Chinnusamy V. 2007. Aerobic rice- a success story. Indian Farming 57(8): 7–10.

Singh S, Mittal J P, Singh M P and Bakhshi R. 1988. Energy-use patterns under various farming systems in Punjab. Applied Energy 30(4): 261–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-2619(88)90013-X

Srinivasarao Ch, Satyanarayana T and Venkateswarlu B. 2011. Potassium mining in Indian Agriculture: Input and output balance. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 24: 20–8.

Tiwari V M, Wahr J and Swenson S. 2009. Dwindling groundwater resources in northern India, from satellite gravity observations. Geophysics Research Letter 36: L1840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039401

Tomar R K, Garg R N and Gupta V K. 2006. Optimum tillage and resource conservation technologies for cropping systems. Indian Farming 56: 27–32.

Torki-Harchegani M, Ebrahimi R and Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki M. 2015. Almond production in Iran: An analysis of energy use efficiency (2008-2011). Renew Sustainable Energy Reviews 41: 217–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.037

Zangeneh M, Omid M and Akram A. 2010. A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy 35: 2927–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.024

Downloads

Submitted

2019-11-14

Published

2019-11-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

S, V., KUMAR, D., SHIVAY, Y. S., SHARMA, V. K., SHARMA, D. K., P, S., S, P., & SINGH, N. (2019). Energy budgeting of aerobic rice (Oriza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system as influenced by potassium fertilization. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(11), 1911–1915. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i11.95341