Efficient integrated weed management practices for higher productivity and profitability in vegetable pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense)
Keywords:
Integrated weed management, Pre-emergence herbicide, Seed quality parameters, Seed yield, Vegetable peaAbstract
A field experiment was conducted on vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L. var. hortense) at Vegetable Research Station, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur during 2014–17 to develop efficient integrated weed management practices. Seven different treatments, viz. pendimethalin @0.75 kg a.i./ha (pre-emergence), pendimethalin @0.75 kg a.i./ha (pre-emergence) + one hand weeding at 40 DAS, glyphosate @1.0 kg a.i./ha 15 days before sowing, glyphosate @1.0 kg a.i. /ha + one hand weeding at 40 DAS, mulching with black polythene, straw/grass mulch, hand weeding thrice at 20, 40 and 60 DAS were tested against two checks, i.e. weed free and weedy check (no weeding) in randomized block design with three replications. Vegetable pea variety ‘Azad Pea-3’ was used in the experiment. Crop was raised with recommended package of practices except treatments. Based on pooled data, among different treatments excluding weed free check, pendimethalin @0.75 kg a.i./ha (preemergence) + one hand weeding at 40 DAS recorded highest plant height (58.75 cm), seed weight/plant (12.73 g), number of seeds/pod (6.55), 100-seeds weight (31.93 g), seed yield (15.96 q/ha), seedling length (17.76 cm), seed vigour index–I (1619.92) and seed vigour index- II (13.17). In case of net return the same treatment also recorded significantly highest B:C ratio (2.30). Thus, pendimethalin @0.75 kg a.i./ha(pre-emergence) + one hand weeding at 40 DAS proved to be most profitable integrated weed management practice for vegetable pea.Downloads
References
Abdul-Baki AA and Anderson J D. 1973. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Science 13: 630–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x
Bakht T, Khan I A, Khan M I, Khan I and Khattak A M. 2009. Weed control in pea (Pisum sativum L.) through mulching. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 15(1): 83–9.
Banga R S, Yadav A and Malik R S. 1998. Evaluation of different herbicides for weed control in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Indian Journal of Weed Science 30: 145–8.
Bhyan B S, Batra V K, Singh J and Thakral K K. 2004. Effect of weed competition on quality of pea seed. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences 33(1-2): 130–1.
Brijbhooshan, Shalini and Singh V K. 2017. Weed dynamics and yield of fieldpea (Pisum sativum var. arvense) as influenced by planting methods, irrigation schedule and weed management practices. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience 5(2): 129–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2644
Gurcharan S H, Kundra C, Brar L S, Gupta R P and Singh G. 1994. Effect of herbicides on soil microorganism dynamics, Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and grain yield of pea (Pisum sativum). Indian Annals of Agricultural Research 15(1): 22–6.
Harker K N. 2001. Survey of yield losses due to weeds in central Alberta. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81: 339–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/P00-102
ISTA. 1993. International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology 21: 288–96.
Jilani M S, Ghaffoor A and Rehman S. 2003. Conventional and chemical control of weeds in five cultivars of transplanted onion. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 9(3-4): 215–24.
Kumar A, Sharma B C, Nandan B and Sharma P K. 2009. Crop weed competition in field pea under rain fed subtropical conditions of Kandi belt of Jammu. Indian Journal of Weed Science 41: 23–6.
Kumar S and Singh C M. 1994. Integrated weed management in vegetable pea (Pisum sativum) under dry temperate condition. Indian Journal of Weed Science 26: 40–4.
Mathukia R K, Gadhiya V and Panara D M. 2015. Weed management in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Crop and Weed 11: 177–80.
Muhammad N, Sattar A, Ashiq M and Ahmad I. 2011. Efficacy of pre and post emergence herbicides to control weeds in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 17(1): 17–24.
Rana M C, Singh A, Rana S S and Kumar N. 2007. Integrated weed management in pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Lahaul Valley condition of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy 77: 59–61.
Randhawa K S, Saimbhi M S and Singh B. 1980.Chemical weed control in seed crop of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Indian Journal of Weed Science 12:186–90.
Sajid M, Rab A, Amin N U, Wahid F, Jan I, Ahmad I, Khan I A and Khan M.A. 2012. Effect of herbicides and row spacing on the growth and yield of pea. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 18(1): 1–13.
Singh J S, Bhan V M and Balyan R S. 1991. Crop weed studies in pea. Indian Journal of Weed Science 23(1-2): 67–8.
Sultana S, Ulah M J, Karim M F and Asaduzzaman M. 2009. Response of mungbean to integrated nitrogen and weed management. American-Eurasian Journal of Agronomy 2: 104–8.
Tewari A N, Husssain N K and Singh B. 1997. Evaluation of herbicides in pea (Pisum sativum) + mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping. Indian Journal of Weed Science 29: 94–7.
Vaishya R D, Rai O P and Singh R K. 1999. Weed control in pea with pre and post emergence herbicides. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 12: 201–5.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.