Time, intensity of detasseling rainfed maize (Zea mays) for improving productivity, economics and rainwater-use efficiency

R SAMMAURIA; J K BALYAN; P C BAIRWA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v89i12.96273

Authors

R SAMMAURIA Professor, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhilwara 311 001, India
J K BALYAN Assistant Professor, Agronomy, MPUAT, Bhilwara
P C BAIRWA Assistant Professor, Soil Science, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute (SKNAU), Durgapura, Jaipur, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i12.96273

Keywords:

Detassling, Net returns, Rainwater use efficiency, Sustainability

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in factorial RBD with three replications during kharif, 2010â€“2012 at Bhilwara, India to study the effect of time and intensity of detassling of rainfed maize on its productivity, economics and rainwater use efficiency. Maize was detassled for 3 time series namely Just after emergence (JAE), 3 Days after emergence (3 DAE) and 7 Days after emergence (7 DAE) and for 4 intensities such as 25, 50, 75 and 100% removal. Detassling had strong positive effect on productivity and economics, particularly during moisture stress situations, suggesting that detasseling is beneficial. Detasseling 7 DAE increased the grain and yield by 22, 9 and 12% in comparison to detasseling JAE during 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The respective figures for these three years for detasseling at 3 DAE were 15, 6 and 10%. Among the intensities, tassel removal up to 50% was the most effective in improving yield characters and yields during all three years and was economically viable. The higher net return and B:C ratio were recorded with detasseling 7DAE. The 50% tassels removal gave the highest net returns. The factor productivity and rainwater use efficiency also improved by various treatments. Detasseling was highly sustainable for physical production and moderately sustainable for viable sustainable Index.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrade F H, Calvino P, Cirilo A and Barbieri P. 2002. Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal 94: 975–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.9750

Barbieri P A, SainzRozas H R, Andrade F H and Echeverria H E. (2000). Row spacing effects at different levels of nitrogen availability in maize. Agronomy Journal 92: 283–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.922283x

Choudhary A K and Rahi S. 2018. Organic cultivation of high yielding turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) cultivars: A viable alternative to enhance rhizome productivity, profitability, quality and resource-use efficiency in monkey–menace areas of north-western Himalayas. Industrial Crops and Products 124: 495–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.069

Heidari H. 2013.Yield, yield components and seed germination of MDAE and JAE. Maize (Zea mays L.) at different defoliation and tassel removal treatments. Philipp Agric Scientist 96(1): 42–7.

Jakhar P, Rana K S, Dass A, Choudhary A K and Choudhary M. 2017a. Influence of moisture-management practices on productivity, profitability and energy dynamics of rainfed maize (Zea mays) in semi-arid sub-tropical climate. Indian Journal of Agronomy 62(2): 191–6.

Jakhar P, Rana K S, Dass A, Choudhary A K, Choudhary M, Adhikary P P and Maharana J R. 2017b. Moisture conservation practices in maize-mustard cropping system: Effects on productivity, water use and soil fertility. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 45(3): 288–95.

Moreira J N, Silva P S L, Silva K M B, Dombroski J L D and Castro R S. 2010. Effect of detasseling on baby corn, green ear and grain yield of two maize hybrids. Horticultura Brasileira 28: 406–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362010000400005

Pooniya V, Choudhary A K and Swarnalaxami K. 2017. High-value crops' imbedded intensive cropping systems for enhanced productivity, resource-use-efficiency, energetics and soil-health in Indo-Gangetic Plains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 87(4): 1073–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0679-6

Prasad D, Rana D S, Babu S, Choudhary A K and Rajpoot S. 2016.Influence of tillage practices and crop diversification on productivity and soil health in maize (Zea mays L.)/Soybean (Glycine max L.) based cropping systems. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86(1): 96–102.

Rahi S and Choudhary A K. 2014. On-farm’ participatory technology development on integrated nutrient management for enhanced crop and rainwater productivity in garlic (Allium sativum L.) in north–western Himalayas. Journal of Agrometeorology 16: 296–7.

Rana D S, Dass A, Rajanna G A and Choudhary A K. 2018. Fertilizer phosphorus solubility effects on Indian mustard–maize and wheat–soybean cropping systems productivity. Agronomy Journal 110(6): 2608–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.04.0256

Sangoi L, Guidolin A F, Coimbra J L M and Silva P R F. 2006. Resposta de híbridos de milho em diferentes épocas à população de plantas e ao despendoamento. Ciencia Rural 36: 1367–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782006000500004

Smith C W, Betran, J and Runge E C A. 2004. Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production, John Wiley and Sons.

Subedi K P. 1996. Effect of leaf stripping, detasseling and topping of maize on maize and relay intercropped finger millet. Experimental Agriculture 32: 57–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700025850

Suri V K and Choudhary A K. 2012.Fertilizer economy through vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under soil-test crop response targeted yield model in maize–wheat–maize crop sequence in Himalayan acid Alfisol. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43(21): 2735–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2012.719979

Velma T and Mangaser E. 2013. International Scientific Reasearch Journal, V(3).

Yadav D S, Choudhary A K, Sood P, Thakur S K, Rahi S and Arya K. 2015. Scaling-up of maize productivity, profitability and adoption through frontline demonstration technology-transfer programme using promising maize hybrids in Himachal Pradesh. Annals of Agricultural Research 36(3): 331–8.