Innovations and investments for transforming India’s rice economy: Submergence tolerant rice varieties in rainfed lowlands of North-Eastern Uttar Pradesh


732 / 345

Authors

  • RAVINDRA RAVINDRA Ph D Scholar, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • ALKA SINGH Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • ANBUKKANI PERUMAL Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i1.98518

Keywords:

Farmers’ perception, Rainfed lowland, Rice economy, Submergence tolerant.

Abstract

The present study provides a brief overview of India’s R&D program and orientation of the public and private research portfolio and investments in reference to the rice research. The farm level and aggregate potential economic benefits from the adoption of improved submergence tolerant rice varieties (Swarna Sub 1, Samba Masuri Sub 1) in the rainfed lowland region of India were estimated based on a field survey conducted in rainfed lowlands of the northeastern region of Uttar Pradesh state. At farm-level, the submergence tolerant varieties had not only 39% higher yield advantage and 63% higher net returns as compared to other popularly grown varieties in the region, but also showed lower yield risk under the prevailing conditions. At the aggregate level, potential benefits from the adoption of these stress-tolerant varieties were also estimated. Farmers’ perception showed that Swarna Sub 1 and Samba Masuri Sub 1 rice varieties are preferred mainly because of their better tolerance to the submergence conditions prevailing in the area during the rainy season. Sarjoo-52 is an old variety but still preferred due to its taste, yield and resistance to pests and diseases. The results amply indicate that farmers’ perception of crop varietal attributes influences largely their choice of varieties at the farm level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dar M H, Janvry A D, Emerick K, Raitzer D and Sadoulet E. 2013. Flood-tolerant rice reduces yield variability and raises expected yield, differentially benefitting socially disadvantaged groups. Scientific Reports 3: 3315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03315

Government of India 2017. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture.

Government of India. 2017. Directorate of Rice Development, Patna, Bihar, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture.

Government of India. 2014. Rice -A Status Paper, Directorate of Rice Development, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, 16pp.

Government of India. Combined Finance and Revenue Accounts- Union and State, Comptroller and Auditor General of India. Retrieved from http://www.cag.gov.in/combined-finance-and-revenue-accounts-and-union-state.

Ismail A M, Singh U S, Singh S, Dar M H and Mackill D J. 2013. The contribution of submergence-tolerant (sub1) rice varieties to food security in flood-prone rainfed lowland areas in Asia. Field Crops Research 152: 83–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.007

Janaiah A and Hossain M. 2004. Partnership in the public sector agricultural R & D: evidence from India. Economics and Political Weekly 39(50): 5327‒34.

Janaiah A, Mahabub H and Keijiro O. 2006. Productivity impact of the modern varieties of rice in India. Developing Economies 44(2): 190–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2006.00013.x

Kelley T, Parthasarathy R, Weltzien E and Purohit M L. 1996. Adoption of improved cultivars of pearl millet in an arid environment: straw yield and quality considerations in western Rajasthan. Experimental Agriculture 32: 161–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700026077

Kumar P, Shinoj P, Raju S S, Kumar A, Rich K M and Sangi S M. 2010. Factor demand, output supply elasticities and supply projections for major crops of India. Agricultural Economics Research Review 23: 1–14.

Kumar P, Kumar A, Shinoj P and Raju S S. 2011. Estimation of demand elasticity for food commodities in India. Agricultural Economics Research Review 24: 1–14.

National Rice Research Institute. 2011. Vision 2030. Cuttack, Odisha.

Pray C E. 2011. Impact of private R&D returns and productivity of hybrid rice in India, Presented at the ICABR meeting, Rome, Italy, 27-29 June 2011.

Spielman D J, Kolady D E and Ward P S. 2013. The prospects for hybrid rice in India. Food Security 5(5): 651–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0291-7

Singh A and Suresh P. 2015. Emerging trends in the public and private investments in agricultural research in India. Agriculture Research 4(2):121‒31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-015-0151-0

Singh A, Suresh P, and Anbukkani P. 2017. Technological innovations, investments, and impact of rice R&D in India. Future Rice Strategies for India. 259–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805374-4.00009-9

Traxler G and Byerlee D. 1993. A joint-product varieties in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75: 981–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1243985

Downloads

Submitted

2020-02-27

Published

2020-03-02

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

RAVINDRA, R., SINGH, A., & PERUMAL, A. (2020). Innovations and investments for transforming India’s rice economy: Submergence tolerant rice varieties in rainfed lowlands of North-Eastern Uttar Pradesh. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i1.98518
Citation