Identification of factors for measuring impact of digital repository by factor analysis


175 / 130

Authors

  • ANKITA CHATURVEDI Research Scholar, Ranchi University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834 001, India
  • G K SRIVASTAVA Head and Dean, Faculty of Commerce and Business Management, Ranchi University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i1.98551

Keywords:

Digital repository, Efficiency, Interactivity, Reliability, Transparency

Abstract

KRISHIKOSH (https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in), a digital repository of M Sc and Ph D thesis/dissertations carried out at different agricultural universities in India, facilitates new ways of sharing institutional knowledge that is leading to new perceptions about research institutions and innovations. The present study was conducted to identify factors that define the impact of digital repository based on the perspectives of the user community. Twenty-two variables measuring e-governance performance selected from literature review are used in designing the questionnaire for conducting opinion survey of researchers using KRISHIKOSH from five agricultural universities in 2019. Factor Analysis performed on the respondents’ perception data has resulted in extraction of five factors explaining about 71% of variation in the data. These factors are characterized as efficiency, interactivity, transparency, reliability and feedback, explaining 44.7%, 9.8%, 6.6%, 4.9% and 4.8% of variation in data, respectively. Based on the variables’ loading coefficient in each extracted factor, the identified variables can be prioritized and focused for maximizing the impact of digital repository and similar e-governance projects in agriculture sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrawal A, Shah P and Wadhwa V. 2007. EGOSQ-users’ assessment of e-governance online-services: A quality measurement instrumentation. (In) Proceeding of International Conference on E-governance, Hyderabad, India, December 28–30: 231–44.

Baro E E and Otiode P G. 2014. Electronic theses and dissertations and institutional repositories: roadmap to research visibility in Africa. Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture 43(3): 114–26.

Bertot J C, Jaeger P T and Grimes J M. 2012. Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 6(1): 78–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161211214831

Bhatnagar S C and Singh N. 2010. Assessing the impact of e-government: A study of projects in India. Information Technology and International Development 6(2): 109–27.

Hair J F, Anderson R E, Tatham R L and Black W C. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn, Dorling Kindersley, Patparganj, Delhi, India.

Hooper D, Coughlan J and Mullen M R. 2008. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 6(1): 53–60.

Kalsi N S and Kiran R. 2013. E-governance success factors: An analysis of e-governance initiatives of ten major states of India. International Journal of Public Sector Management 26(40): 320–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2011-0101

Prasad S V S R and Reghunath K P. 2010. Empirical analysis of construction safety climate – A study. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2(6): 1699–1707.

Sharma R, Kumar A, Pandey P S, Himanshu, Gupta M, Kapur S, Sharma A and Jain A K. 2017. KRISHIKOSH: A digital repository to disseminate agricultural knowledge. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(5): 757–65.

Suri P K and Sushil. 2017. Strategic planning and implementation of e-governance. Springer Science and Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2176-3

Thomasa B, Basila M, Christinaa M, Fedraa K and Manuelaa T. 2013. Measuring users satisfaction of an e-Government Portal, Science Direct, Procedia Technology 8: 371–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11.049

Tripathi M and Jeevan V K J. 2011. An evaluation of digital libraries and institutional repositories in India. Journal of Academic Librarianship 37(6): 543–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.08.012

Downloads

Submitted

2020-02-27

Published

2020-03-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CHATURVEDI, A., & SRIVASTAVA, G. K. (2020). Identification of factors for measuring impact of digital repository by factor analysis. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(1), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i1.98551
Citation