Farmers’ experience with subsidy scheme on power tillers to enhance farm mechanization in India

A K SINGH; KESHAVA S PAUL; R ROY BURMAN; SUDIPTA PAUL; SUKANYA SOM; ANJANI KUMAR; B C DEKA; A K TRIPATHI; Y G PRASAD

doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i1.98596

Authors

A K SINGH Deputy Director General, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
KESHAVA S PAUL Principal Scientist, Agricultural Extension, KAB-I, ICAR HQs, New Delhi
R ROY BURMAN Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
SUDIPTA PAUL Scientist, Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-IARI, Pusa Campus, New Delhi
SUKANYA SOM Scientist, Fisheries Extension, ICAR-CIFRI, Barrackpore, West Bengal
ANJANI KUMAR Director, ICAR-ATARI, Patna, Bihar
B C DEKA Director, ICAR-ATARI, Umiam, Meghalaya
A K TRIPATHI Director, ICAR-ATARI, Guwahati, Assam
Y G PRASAD Director, ICAR-ATARI, Hyderabad, Telengana

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i1.98596

Keywords:

Cost, Farm mechanization, Power tiller, Subsidy

Abstract

Realizing the importance of farm mechanization in purview of shortage of farm labour and increasing demand from land for higher productivity, the Government of India implemented a subsidy scheme for promoting purchase and use of power tillers by farmers during 2007–2015. The present study aimed at assessing perception of the beneficiaries about the status of implementation of the scheme with a focus on power tiller purchase, use, and hindrances (if any). The study was conducted in randomly selected 23 districts from 5 purposively selected states of India with a total of 746 beneficiary farmers (n=746). Primary cross sectional data were collected with the help of a structured personal interview schedule. Variation was noticed among the states regarding cost and subsidy received to buy the power tillers. The average cost of power tillers including subsidy, was the highest for Tripura (`₹ 171577) followed by Assam (`₹ 169317). The average amount of subsidy was ` ₹ 70701 with the highest reported in Andhra Pradesh (` ₹ 90626). Overall, a majority (91.96%) of the respondents reported not to face difficulties in availing the subsidy. Overall 89.01% of the beneficiaries expressed satisfaction with the quality of power tillers supplied under the scheme. However, more than half of the beneficiaries were not satisfied with the overall services provided by the dealers including training and maintenance services. The findings of the study will be helpful for policy makers to evaluate the scheme and make improvements based on the lacuna investigated in the study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous 2015. Transforming agriculture through mechanisation: a knowledge paper on Indian farm equipment sector. (In) Proceedings of International Exhibition and Conference on Agri-machinery and equipment during 3-5 December 2015 at IARI, New Delhi by FICCI and Grant Thornton India LLP.

aAnonymous. 2017. Report of the Expert Committee on power tiller. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Govt. Of India.

bAnonymous. 2017. Indian farm mechanization market overview. (In) Farm Mechanization: National Round Table Conference, held on 31 January 2017 in New Delhi.

Cherian A, Punnan J and Varghese A. 2016. A review on power tiller attachments. Paper presented at Kerala Technological Congress (KETCON-2016 Technology for Sustainability).

Gupta J P and Kumar S. 2001. Status of power tiller use in Bihar - a case study in Nalanda district. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa, and Latin America 32: 19–22.

ICFA. 2017. Indian Farm Mechanization Market. Indian Council of Food and Agriculture, New Delhi, India.

Kumar S. 2014. A study on the agricultural mechanization in Karimnagar district of Andhra Pradesh. M Sc. thesis, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University. Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.

Mandal S K and Maity A. 2011. Development and performance evaluation of a light weight power tiller. (In) Proceedings of National Conference on Machines and Mechanism, NACOMM 2011. IIT Madras, India, pp 319–25.

Mandal S K, Maity A and Prasad A K. 2016. Performance evaluation of a lightweight power tiller. Agriculture for Sustainable Development 3 (4): 126–29.

Mehta C, Chandel N and Senthilkumar T. 2014. Status, challenges and strategies for farm mechanization in India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America 45: 43–50.

Mia M A and Haque M E. 2015. Farm level impact study of power tiller operated seeder on service providers’ livelihood in some selected sites of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 40(4): 669–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v40i4.26941

Patra S. 2014. Study the extent of farm mechanization with respect to tractor and power tiller in rice growing belt of Orissa. (In) Report of the Summer Internship Program at Odisha Farm Machinery Research and Development Centre (OFMRDC), Bhubaneswar.

Singh J. 2006. Scope, progress and constraints of farm mechanization in India, Status of Farm Mechanization in India, pp.48–56. ICAR. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Thomas E V, Sahay C S and Satapathy K K. 2006. Prospects and problems of power tillers in selected districts of north eastern hilly region in India - a case study. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa, and Latin America 37(3): 39–45.

Verma M and Tripathy A. 2015. Perspective of agricultural mechanization in Supaul district of North Bihar- a Research. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 8(8): 4–12.