Relative importance of evaluation criteria for predicting the optimallocation in aquaculture - a pairwise comparison method approach
211 / 73
Abstract
Identification of optimal location for aquaculture is based on the evaluation of a number of alternatives in termsof a number of decision criteria. In this study, decision criteria were categorized into six broad heads of evaluationcriteria, namely; water, soil, support, infrastructure, input, and risk factor. The information about the relativeimportance of the evaluation criteria was achieved by assigning weightage to each criterion. The relativeimportance of evaluation criteria under consideration was defined by pairwise comparison method. It takes thepairwise comparisons as the input and produces the relative weights as output. Result of the pairwise comparisonmethod showed that the consistency ratio (0.0347) of evaluation criteria was less than the threshold value (0.1).This indicates that the comparisons of each evaluation criterion were perfectly consistent and the relative weightswere suitable for the use in the identification of optimal location in aquaculture.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Submitted
2016-09-24
Published
2016-09-24
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The copyright of the articles published in Indian Journal of Fisheries vests with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, who has the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad engaged in reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information contained in these journals. The Council has no objection in using the material, provided the information is being utilized for academic purpose but not for commercial use. Due credit line should be given to the ICAR where information will be utilized.How to Cite
Mahalakshmi, P., & Ganesan, K. (2016). Relative importance of evaluation criteria for predicting the optimallocation in aquaculture - a pairwise comparison method approach. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 56(4), 313-316. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJF/article/view/61813