A survey on different cooking methods of chicken products sold in different outlets in Chennai: Its texture profile and sensory properties

Survey on different chicken products


34 / 27

Authors

  • A. Vanathi Livestock Farm Complex, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Veerapandi, Theni – 625 534, TANUVAS, India. Author
  • V. Appa Rao Department of Livestock Products Technology (Meat Science), Madras Veterinary College, Chennai – 600 007, TANUVAS, India. Author
  • R. Narendra Babu Director of Extension Education, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai – 600 051, TANUVAS, India. Author
  • K. Jeeva Livestock Farm Complex, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Veerapandi, Theni – 625 534, TANUVAS, India. Author

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijps.v59i2.165189

Keywords:

Chicken products, Texture profile, Sensory properties, Different outlets

Abstract

This survey was envisaged to study the effect of different cooking methods (dry heat cooking and moist cooking) on the texture profile and sensory characteristics of chicken products sold in three different outlets (street outlets, small hotels and restaurants) and around Chennai. Hardness, gumminess and chewiness values were found higher in street outlets that that of small hotels and restaurants. Whereas, adhesiveness, springiness and cohesiveness values (P>0.05) were found non-significant in all the four chicken products prepared by dry and moist cooking, in street outlets, small hotels and restaurants, except for cohesiveness value (P<0.05) in chicken gravy. But in all the three outlets, highly significant differences (P<0.01) were found between products, of which chicken 65, than grilled chicken, chicken biryani and chicken gravy was found higher in all the texture profile properties. Colour and appearance, flavour, tenderness, juiciness and overall acceptability score were higher (P<0.01), in chicken products from restaurant than that from street vendors and small hotels. In street outlets and small hotels chicken biryani, followed by chicken gravy scored the lowest value in all the sensory properties when compare with chicken 65 and grilled chicken. Whereas, in restaurants all the four chicken products scored the highest value (P<0.01) in all the sensory properties, except for juiciness score was found not significant. The result showed that dry cooked and moist cooked chicken products such as chicken 65, grilled chicken, chicken biryani and chicken gravy sold in restaurants had better texture profile and sensory properties among different products grilled chicken had good sensory scores in all the three outlets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basics of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Statistic (BAHS). 2022. AHS SERIES.

Bergara-Almeida, S. and Da Silva, M.A.A.P. 2002. Hedonic scale with reference: Performance in obtaining predictive models. Food Qual. Prefer. 13: 57-64.

Bourne, M.C. 1978. Texture profile analysis. Food Technology, 32: 62-72.

Callahan, Z.D., Belk, K.E., Miller, R.K., Morgan, J.B. and Lorenzen, C.L. 2013. Combining two proven mechanical tenderness measurements in one steak. Journal of Animal Science. 91: 4521- 4525.

Choi, Y. S., Choi, J. H., Kim, H. Y., Kim, H. W., Lee, M. A., Chung, H. J., Lee, S. K. and Kim, C. J. 2011. Effect of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) leaf powder on the quality characteristics of chicken patties in refrigerated storage. Korean Journal of Food Cookery Science. 31: 9-18.

Cholan, P, Rao, V.K., Karthikeyan, B., Moorthy, P. and Cytyarasan, S. 2011. Effect of different cooking methods on physicochemical, organoleptic and microbiological quality of chicken patties. Indian Journal of Poult Science. 46: 206–210.

Fabre, R., Dalzotto, G., Perlo, F., Bonato, P., Teira, G. and Tisocco, O. 2018. Cooking method effect on Warner-Bratzler shear force of different beef muscles. Meat Science, 138: 10–14.

Feng, Q., Jiang, S., Feng, X., Zhou, X., Wang, H., Li, Y., Wang, J., Tang, S., Chen, Y. and

Zhao, Y. 2020. Effect of different cooking methods on sensory assessment and invitro digestibility of sturgeon steak. Food Science and Nutrition 8(4): 1957-1967.

Hanson, R.E. 2004. Smoking and Cooking Equipment. In: Jensen WK, Devine C, Dikeman M (eds), Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences, pp. 1060–1073. Elsevier, Oxford.

Jeon, K. H., Kwon, K. H., Kim, E. M., Kim, Y. B., Sohn, D. I. and Choi, J. Y. 2013. Effect of cooking methods with various heating apparatus on the quality characteristics of beef. The Korean Journal of Culinary Research. 19: 196-205.

Liu, J., Han, L., Han, W., Gui, L., Yuan, Z., Hou, S., Wang, Z., Yang, B., Raza, S.H.A., Alowais, A.F.S., Alraddadi, A.A. and Alanazi, A.M. 2022. Effect of different heat treatment on the quality and flavour compound of Balack Tibetan Sheep meat by HS-GC-IMS coupled with multivariate analysis. Molecule. 25(28): 165 https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010165

Oh, J. H., Yoon, S. and Choi, Y. 2014. The effect of superheated steam cooking condition on physic-chemical and sensory characteristics of chicken breast fillets. Korean Journal of Food and Cookery Science. 30: 317-324.

Rani, Z.T.; Nantapo, C.W.T.; Hugo, A.; Muchenje, V. 2014. Differences in Health-Related Fatty Acids, Intramuscular Fat and the Physico-Chemical Quality in Mutton as Affected by Season, Place of Purchase and Meat Portion. Asian-Australas Journal of Animal Science. 27: 1630–1637.

Seo, S.H., Kim, E.M., Kim, Y.B., Cho, E.K. and Woo, H.J. 2014. A study on development of samgyetang using superheated steam and high hydrostatic pressure. Korean Journal of Food Cookery Science. 30: 183-192.

Singh, P., Chatli, M.K., Sahoo, J. and Biswas, A.K. 2012. Effect of different cooking methods on the physico-chemical and sensory attributes of chicken meat caruncles. Indian Journal of Poultry Science. 47(3): 363 – 367.

Tiwari, B.K. and O’Donnell, C. 2012. Thermal processing of meat and meat products. In: Sun DW (ed), Thermal Food Processing: New Technologies and Quality Issues, 2nd edn, pp. 195–220. CRC Press, Florida.

Tornberg, E. 2005. Effects of heat on meat proteins–Implications on structure and quality of meat products. Meat science, 70: 493-508.

Vanathi, A, Appa Rao, V., Narendra Babu, R., Ezhilvelan, S., Ramani, R. and Vasanthi, C.

2022. Effect of different cooking methods on the proximate composition of chicken products sold at different outlets in and around Chennai. International Journal of Genetics, 14(3): 847-849.

Vanathi, A, Appa Rao, V., Narendra Babu and Jeeva. K. 2024. Chicken products from Chennai: Effect of Different cooking methods on physicochemical and microbial quality from different outlets. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. DOI: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-2189.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-02-21

Published

2025-07-03

How to Cite

A. Vanathi, V. Appa Rao, R. Narendra Babu, & K. Jeeva. (2025). A survey on different cooking methods of chicken products sold in different outlets in Chennai: Its texture profile and sensory properties: Survey on different chicken products. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 59(2), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijps.v59i2.165189