Adoption and perceived effectiveness of traditional practices to mitigate human-wild pig conflict situations


111 / 47

Authors

  • K. Senthilkumar Assistant Professor, Postgraduate Research Institute in Animal Sciences, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kattupakkam- 603 203
  • P. Mathialagan Former Professor and Head, Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai-7
  • C. Manivannan Professor and Head, University Publication Division,Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai - 600 051

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v49i2.127264

Keywords:

Human-pig conflict, traditional practices, metal cow bells, shining tapes, scarecrows, fireworks

Abstract

Human–wild pig conflict is one of the main threats to farmers as wild pig destroys the growing crops completely. Krishnagiri district of Tamil Nadu was purposefully selected for the study as it ranked first in human-wild pig conflict incidents in Tamil Nadu. Farmers who had at least one wildlife conflict incidence in their lifetime were selected for this study during 2015- 16 on adoption and effectiveness of traditional practices to manage human-wild pig conflict situations. Sixty participants were selected using the snow ball sampling and data were collected using semi-structured interviews, complemented by free listing techniques, nonspecific prompting and reading back. A total number of nine traditional practices were identified and found that they were adopted at various levels. Further, boundary clearing, using metal cow bells and using shining tapes (100 %) were found to be most effective traditional method followed by fireworks/ crackers (75 %), noise making (72.2 %) and scarecrows (69.6 %). Although encouraging, these results require more widespread testing and demonstration to ensure their effectiveness at broader scales.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Khan, S., Gupta, S., Ilyas, O., Roy, A and Haleem, A. (2019).Evaluation of suitable habitat for wild boar (Susscorfa) in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 45(2):157-164.

Graham, M. D and Ochieng, T. (2008). Uptake and performance of farm-based measures for reducing crop raiding by elephants Loxodontaafricana among smallholder farms in Laikipia District, Kenya. Oryx, 42(1):76-82.

McKee, S., Anderson, A., Carlisle, K and Shwiff, S. A. (2020). Economic estimates of invasive wild pig damage to crops in 12 US states. Crop Protection, 132(6) 105105.

Meena, R. P., Meena, B. L., Nandal, U and Meena, C. L. (2014) Indigenous measures developed by farmers to curb the menace of blue bull (Boselaphustragocamelus) in district Rajsamand, Rajasthan, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 13(1):208-215.

Naik, M. I and Basavadarshan, A. V. (2020). Incidence and efficacy of crop protection measures against wild boar (Susscrofa L.) in groundnut (Arachishypogaea L.).Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 8(3):1616- 1620

Nyika, E. (2017). The human-wildlife conflict: a survey of attitudes of local farmers towards crop raiding baboons in concession, Mazowe District of Mashonaland Central Province, Zimbabwe (Doctoral dissertation, BUSE).

Ponnusamy, K., Kale, R.B., Ravi, K.N., Devi.M.C.A and Sharma, P. (2017).Cross-regional analysis on usage of Indigenous Technical Knowledge in dairy farming. Indian Journal of animal Research, 51(3):549-556.

Rao, V. V., Naresh, B., Reddy, V. R., Sudhakar, C., Venkateswarlu, P and Rao, D. R. (2015). Traditional management methods used to minimize wild boar (Susscrofa) damage in different agricultural crops at Telangana state, India. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(2):32-36.

Downloads

Submitted

24-08-2022

Published

03-11-2025

Issue

Section

Full Length Articles

How to Cite

K. Senthilkumar, P. Mathialagan, & C. Manivannan. (2025). Adoption and perceived effectiveness of traditional practices to mitigate human-wild pig conflict situations . Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research, 49(2), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v49i2.127264
Citation