EFFECT OF SEX ON GROWTH AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMERCIAL BROILERS


124 / 10

Authors

  • R. Richard Churchil Professor and Head, Department of Poultry Science, Madras Veterinary College, TANUVAS, Chennai – 600 007
  • Sagar PG Student, Department of Poultry Science, Madras Veterinary College, TANUVAS, Chennai – 600 007

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v52i6.149099

Keywords:

Commercial broiler, male and female, effect of sex, growth pattern, carcass characters

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of sex on growth pattern and carcass characters of commercial broilers. One hundred and twenty numbers of day-old chicks were wing banded, weighed and reared up to 40 days of age. The body weight was individually recorded from all the birds on 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 40 days of age to assess the influence of gender on body weight. At the end of the experiment 12 males and 12 females were subjected to slaughter studies to assess the carcass characters. The body weight between males and females were similar up to 14 days of age and thereafter, males recorded significantly (p<0.01) higher body weights on 21, 28, 35, 40 days of age, weighing 35.79, 107.69, 179.73, 211.88 g respectively higher than females. The ready-to-cook weight (%) and dressed carcass (%) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in males; whereas, New York carcass (%) was significantly (p<0.05) higher in females. Among the cut of parts, the drumstick percentage was significantly (p<0.05) higher in males, whereas, the wings percentage was significantly (p<0.05) higher in females. Among processing yields and losses, only shank & feet and abdominal fat (%) showed significant (p<0.05) difference between sexes; while, feather, blood, head, viscera, kidney and total offal yields had non-significant difference between sexes. Among giblets, only the heart yield was significantly (p<0.05) different between sexes with higher value in females. The results showed that the males attain marketable weight early, therefore can be marketed early. The males can be slaughtered earlier than females for producing specialized products from drumstick; whereas, females can be slaughtered early to harvest drumette. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A.Y., Al-Beitawi, N.A., Rjoup, M.M.S., Qudsieh, R.I. and Ishmais, M.A.A. (2010). Growth performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics of different commercial crosses of broiler strains of chicken. The Journal of Poultry Science, 47: 13 – 21.

Almasi, A., Suto, Z., Budai, Z., Donko, T., Milisits, G. and Horn, P. (2012). Effect of age, sex and strain on growth, body composition and carcass characteristics of dual purpose type chicken. World Poultry Congress 2012, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 5-8 August 2012. Worlds Poultry Science Journal, 68 (1): 285 - 288.

Azahan, E.A.E., Marhi, A.M. and Norazha, M. (2007). Evaluation of the effects of sex on growth and carcass characteristics of broilers. Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Science, 35: 313 - 318.

Becker, W.A., Spencer J.V. and Verstrate, J.A. (1981). Abdominal and carcass fat in five broiler strains. Poultry Science, 60: 693 - 697.

Benyi, K., Tshilate, T.S., Netshipale, A.J. and Mahlako, K.T. (2015). Effects of genotype and sex on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 47(7): 1225 - 1231.

BIS (2007). Indian Standard - Poultry Feeds - Specification (fifth Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, No. 9, Bhadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002.

Da Costa, M.J., Zaragoza-Santacruz, S., Frost, T.J., Halley, J. and Pesti, G.M. (2017). Straight-run vs. sex separate rearing for 2 broiler genetic lines Part 1: Live production parameters, carcass yield, and feeding behavior. Poultry Science, 96(8): 2641 - 2661.

Hassani-Vaslan, S.I., Gollan, A.R.A., Motaghini, G., Namvari, M. and Hamedi, M. (2010). Comparison of growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicken fed diets with various energy and constant energy to protein ratio. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9: 2565 - 2570.

Henry, M.H. and Burke, W.H. (1998). Sexual dimorphism in broiler chick embryos and embryonic muscle development in late incubation. Poultry Science, 77(5): 728 - 736.

Ikusika, O., Falowo, A., Mpendulo, C., Zindove, T. and Okoh, A. (2020). Effect of strain, sex and slaughter weight on growth performance, carcass yield and quality of broiler meat. Open Agriculture, 5: 607 - 616.

Isidahomen, C.E., Iori, B.M. and Akano, K. (2012). Genetic and sex differences in carcass traits of Nigerian indigenous chickens. Journal of Animal Science Advances, 2: 636 - 648.

Kamporn, K. and Deeden, B. (2022). Effect of strain and gender on production performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of broiler chickens. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 18(2): 567 – 578.

Kidd, M.T., Corzo, A., Hoehler, D., Miller, E.R. and Dozier, W.A. III. (2005). Broiler responsiveness (Ross x 708) to diets varying in amino acid density. Poultry Science, 84(9): 1389 - 1396.

Le Bihan-Duval, E., Mignon-Grateau, S., Millet, N. and Beaumont, C. (1998). Genetic analysis of a selection on increased body weight and breast muscle weight as well as on limited abdominal fat weight. British Poultry Science, 39: 346 – 353.

Madilindi, M.A., Mokobane, A., Letwaba, P.B., Tshilate, T.S., Banga, C.B., Rambau, M.D., Bhebhe, E. and Benyi, K. (2018). Effects of sex and stocking density on the performance of broiler chickens in a subtropical environment. South African Journal of Animal Science, 48(3): 459 - 468.

Merkley, J.W., Weinland, B.T., Malone, G.W. and Chaloupka, G.W. (1980). Evaluation of five commercial broiler crosses. 2. Eviscerated yield and component parts. Poultry Science, 59: 1755 – 1760.

Nascimento, do D.C.N., Dourado, L.R.B., Siqueira, de J.C., Lima, de S.B.P., Silva, da M. da C. M., Silva, da G.G., Sakomura, N.K., Ferreira, G.J.B. de C. and Biagiotti, D. (2018). Productive features of broiler chickens in hot weather: effects of strain and sex. Ciencias Agrarias, 39: 731 - 745.

Nikolova, N., Pavlovski, Z., Milosevic, N. and Peric, L. (2007). The quality of abdominal fat in broiler chickens of different genotypes from fifth to seventh week of age. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 23: 331 – 338.

Olawumi, S.O. and Fagbuaro, S.S. (2011). Productive performance of three commercial broiler genotypes reared in the derived Savannah zone of Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 798 - 804.

Shafey, T. M., Alodan, M. A., Hussein, E.O.S. and Al-Batshan, H.A. (2013). The effect of sex on the accuracy of predicting carcass composition of Ross broiler chickens. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 23(4): 975 – 980.

Shim, M.Y., Tahir, M., Karnuah, A.B., Miller, M., Pringle, T.D., Aggrey, S.E. and Pesti, G.M. (2012). Strain and sex effects on growth performance and carcass traits of contemporary commercial broiler crosses. Poultry Science, 91(11): 2942 - 2948.

Suchon, T., Tanachai, T., Prajit U., Watcharin, K., Supunsa, A. and Boonlom, C. (2017). Comparison of production performance and carcass composition of commercial broiler strains 1. Cobb, Arbor Acres and Ross. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2: 210 - 216.

Tanachai, T., Suchon, T., Prajit, U., Watcharin, K., Supunsa, A. and Boonlom, C. (2017). Comparison of production performance and carcass composition of commercial broiler strains 2. Cobb and Ross. Agricultural Science Journal, 48: 217 - 224.

Young, L.L., Northcutt, J.K., Buhr, R.J., Lyon, C.E. and Ware, G.O. (2001). Effects of age, sex, and duration of postmortem aging on percentage yield of parts from broiler chicken carcasses, Poultry Science, 80(3): 376 - 379.

Zuidhof, M.J. and Schneider, B.L. (2014). Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957, 1978, and 2005. Poultry Science, 93(12): 2970 – 2982.

Downloads

Submitted

01-03-2024

Published

25-08-2025

How to Cite

R. Richard Churchil, & Sagar. (2025). EFFECT OF SEX ON GROWTH AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMERCIAL BROILERS. Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research, 52(6), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v52i6.149099
Citation