EFFECT OF NATURAL SYNBIOTIC CONSORTIUM ON BROILER MEAT QUALITY


213 / 189

Authors

  • K. Divya Manjari Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Madras Veterinary College Campus, Chennai - 600 007
  • M. Parthiban Professor and Head, Department of Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Madras Veterinary College Campus, Chennai - 600 007
  • T.M.A. Senthilkumar Professor and Head, Zoonoses Research Laboratory, Centre for Animal Health Studies, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai - 600 051.
  • R. Karunakaran Professor, Department of Animal Nutrition, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai - 600 007
  • V. Appa Rao Director of Extension Education, TANUVAS, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai - 600 051

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v54i3.167837

Keywords:

Broiler, synbiotic consortium, meat quality assessment, probiotics, antioxidant

Abstract

Synbiotics are synergistic combinations of prebiotics and probiotics. This study was aimed to design synbiotic in vitro and validate them in broiler chickens upon in vivo delivery. Based on the in vitro assays and extracellular assays for estimation of the antioxidant potential, a scoring system was evaluated to screen the probiotic isolated with maximum antioxidant potential.  A consortium of probiotic bacteria was formulated based on the scoring system that comprised E. hirae-2, E. faecium-2, E. fecalis-1, E. durans, and P. acidilactici. The probiotic inoculum was scaled up in a fifty-liter pilot scale fermenter supplemented with MRS broth under optimum growth conditions. The product was then spray-dried in a low-temperature spray drier. The lyophilized product was stored at room temperature for further use. Two hundred and forty day sold broiler chicks (Vencobb) were randomly allotted to one of five treatments (prebiotic alone, probiotic alone, symbiotic, and commercial probiotic and control treatments) on the basis of body weight in a randomized complete block design. Dietary supplementation of probiotics significantly enhanced growth performance by improving body weight gain, performance index, and protein efficiency ratio. Growth performance and nutrient retention of the Lactiflora-supplemented group was significantly better than that of the control and Provisacc-supplemented group but comparable to the combination group. It was concluded that combined supplementation of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation at the rate of 0.05% each is beneficial in improving body weight gain, growth performance, nutrient utilization, and immune response of broiler chicken.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeyemi, K.D. and Sazili, A.Q., (2014). Efficacy of carcass electrical stimulation in meat quality enhancement: a review. Asian- Australasian journal of animal sciences, 27(3):447.

AOAC. (2000). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International (17th ed.) Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC.

Bansal, S., Mangal, M., Sharma, S.K. and Gupta, R.K., (2016). Non-dairy based probiotics: a healthy treat for intestine. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 56(11):1856-1867.

Barbut, S., (1997). Problem of pale soft exudative meat in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 38(4):355-358.

Bratzler, L.J., (1954). Using the Warner- Bratzler shear. In Proc. Recip. Meat Conf, 7: 154-160.

Duclos, M.J., Berri, C. and Le Bihan-Duval, E., (2007). Muscle growth and meat quality. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 16(1):107-112.

Farrell, D. (2013). The role of poultry in human nutrition. Poultry Development Review. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization :2-9.

Garcia, R.G., De Freitas, L.W., Schwingel, A.W., Farias, R.M., Caldara, F.R., Gabriel, A.M.A., Graciano, J.D., Komiyama, C.M. and Almeida Paz, I.C.L., (2010). Incidence and physical properties of PSE chicken meat in a commercial processing plant. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 12:233-237.

Grau, R. and Hamm, R. (1957). About the water-binding capacity of the mammalian muscle. II. Commun. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Brisk, 105:446.

Joy, A.D. and Samuel, J.J. (1997). Effect of probiotic supplementation on the performance of broilers, 28: 10-14.

Khaksefidi, A. and Rahimi, S., (2005). Effect of probiotic inclusion in the diet of broiler chickens on performance, feed efficiency and carcass quality. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 18(8):1153-1156.

Kumar, L., Singh, P.K. and Kumar, M., (2013). Effect of dietary supplementation of combination of probiotics on the growth performance and immune response of broiler chickens. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 13(1):15-25.

Manjari, K.D., Divya, G., Saravanan, T.S. and Parthiban, M., (2019). In vitro selection of potential immunomodulatory multispecies lactic acid bacteria in broilers. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 53(5):655-660.

O’dea, E.E., Fasenko, G.M., Allison, G.E., Korver, D.R., Tannock, G.W. and Guan, L.L., (2006). Investigating the effects of commercial probiotics on broiler chick quality and production efficiency. Poultry Science, 85(10):1855-1863.

Panda, A.K., Rama Rao, S.S., Raju, M.V. and Sharma, S.S., (2008). Effect of probiotic (Lactobacillus sporogenes) feeding on egg production and quality, yolk cholesterol and humoral immune response of White Leghorn layer breeders. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88(1):43-47.

Pearson, D., (1968). Application of chemical methods for the assessment of beef quality. II. Methods related to protein breakdown. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 19(7):366-369.

Saláková, A., Straková, E., Válková, V., Buchtová, H. and Steinhauserová, I., (2009). Quality indicators of chicken broiler raw and cooked meat depending on their sex. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 78(3):497-504.

Sañudo, C., Nute, G.R., Campo, M.M., Maria, G., Baker, A., Sierra, I., Enser, M.E. and Wood, J.D., (1998). Assessment of commercial lamb meat quality by British and Spanish taste panels. Meat Science, 48(1-2): 91- 100.

Sharma Bajagai, Y., Klieve, A., Dart, P. and Bryden, W., (2016). Probiotics in animal nutrition: Production, impact and regulation.

SN, N., (1992). Effect of direct-fed microbials on nutrient retention production parameters of laying pullets. Poultry Science, 71(1):111.

Sreeja, V. and Prajapati, J.B., (2013). Probiotic formulations: application and status as pharmaceutical A review. Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 5:81-91.

Strange, E.D., Benedict, R.C., Smith, J.L. and Swift, C.E., (1977). Evaluation of rapid tests for monitoring alterations in meat quality during storage. Journal of Food Protection, 40(12):843-847.

Troutt, E.S., Hunt, M.C., Johnson, D.E., Claus, J.R., Kastner, C.L. and Kropf, D.H., (1992). Characteristics of low- fat ground beef containing texture- modifying ingredients. Journal of Food science, 57(1):19-24.

Zheng, A., Luo, J., Meng, K., Li, J., Bryden, W.L., Chang, W., Zhang, S., Wang, L.X.N., Liu, G. and Yao, B., (2016). Probiotic (Enterococcus faecium) induced responses of the hepatic proteome improves metabolic efficiency of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus). BMC genomics, 17:1-12.

Downloads

Submitted

13-06-2025

Published

19-06-2025

Issue

Section

Full Length Articles

How to Cite

K. Divya Manjari, M. Parthiban, T.M.A. Senthilkumar, R. Karunakaran, & V. Appa Rao. (2025). EFFECT OF NATURAL SYNBIOTIC CONSORTIUM ON BROILER MEAT QUALITY. Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research, 54(3), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v54i3.167837
Citation