A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF ASEEL CHICKEN REARING, FEEDING AND MARKETING: SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS ON FARMERS IN PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT
75 / 47
Keywords:
Backyard poultry, Aseel, rearing, feeding, socio-economic statusAbstract
The study investigates the rearing practices and feeding systems of Aseel chicken in Pudukkottai District, Tamil Nadu, and a region where backyard poultry farming significantly contributes to rural livelihood. Data were collected from 60 farmers using structured questionnaire to assess their socio-economic profile, and management practices. Most farmers were categorized as small (51.67%) or marginal (36.67%) landholders, owning 2.5–5 acres of land, and considered poultry rearing as a secondary income source alongside agriculture, which was the primary occupation for 86.67% of respondents. Rearing systems predominantly followed the “all-in-all-out” method (55%), although housing and litter management practices often deviated from ideal standards. Only 15% of farmers provided recommended floor space of 1.5–2 sq. ft. per bird and litter thickness of 3–5 inches. Feeding practices relied heavily on scavenging (73.33%), with supplementary feeding using locally available ingredients such as broken rice, maize, and other grains. Single- type litter materials, like paddy husk, coir pith, or wooden shavings, were used by 83.33% of farmers. The study also found that the majority of farmers (66.67%) had medium experience in poultry rearing, averaging 15.48 years. Despite considerable traditional knowledge, there were notable gaps in adopting improved husbandry practices such as ideal housing, litter management, and supplementary feeding. These findings highlight the need for capacity-building initiatives to enhance farmers’ awareness and implementation of optimal rearing techniques, ultimately improving productivity and contribute to the sustainable livelihoods of rural communities.
Downloads
References
Alfred, B., Msoffe, P.L.M., Kajuna, F.F., Bunn, D., Muhairwa, A.P. and Cardona, C.J. (2012). Causes of losses in free range local chickens following control of Newcastle disease in three villages in Morogoro, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 24 : 124.
Balamurugan, P., Senthilkumar, A. and Murugesan, S. (2017). An analysis on socio-economic profile of backyard poultry farmers in Theni district if Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6(6): 3513 – 3519.
Balamurugan, P., Ezhilvalavan, S., AshaRajini, R., Sudeepkumar, N.K., Serma Saravana Pandiyan, A. and Sundaresan, A. 2015. Adoption of management practices in intensive native chicken rearing. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 50(2): 213 – 217.
Bhattacharya, M., Buragohain, R., Ahmed, F.A., Pathak, P.K. and Ghosh, M.K. (2005). Laying performance of Vanaraja birds in high altitude areas of Arunachal Pradesh under backyard system of rearing. Conference and National Symposium, Indian Poultry Science Association, Project Directorate on Poultry, Hyderabad, from 2-4 February 2005, 197 - 198.
Bikash, B., Hazarika, P. and Saharia, K.K. (2010). Socioeconomic and psychological status of poultry farmers in Dibugarh district of Assam. Indian Journal of Field Veterinarians, 5(4): 67 – 69.
Dumrya, S., Ghosh, S. and Goswami, R. (2015). Characterization of backyard poultry farming in Indian Sundarban region. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 50(1): 90 – 95.
FAO/APHCA, (2008). Asian milk for health and wealth.
Kumaresan, A., Bujarbaruah, K.M., Pathak, K.A., Chettri, B., Ahmedand S.K. and Haunshi, S. (2008). Analysis of a village chicken production system and performance of improved dual- purpose chickens under a subtropical hill agro-ecosystem in India. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 40: 395 - 402.
Kyule, N.M. (2014). Indigenous chicken rearing system and their influence on household income among small scale farmers in Mau-Narok division of Njoro District, Nakuru County Kenya. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2(5): 638 – 650.
Mandal, M.K., Khandekar, N. and Khandekar, P. (2006). Backyard poultry farming in Bareilly district of Uttar Pradesh, India: an analysis. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18(7): 20 – 39.
Mapiye, C., Mwale, M., Mupangwa, J.F., Chimonyo, M., Foti, R. and Mutenje, M. J. (2008). Area search review of village chicken production constraints and opportunities in Zimbabwe. Asian– Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 21(11): 1680 – 1688.
Muchenje, V. and Sibenda, S. (1997). Informal Survey Report on Poultry Production System in Chicken and Sanyati Farming area. Crop Livestock Farming System Research Methodologies Training Workshop. UZ/RVAU/DIAs/Danida Project Report, 23 – 24.
Nath, B.G., Pathak, and Mohanty, A.K. (2012). Constraint analysis of poultry production at Dzongu area of North Sikkim in India. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 2(4): 397 – 401.
Pathak, P.K. and Nath, B.G. (2013). Rural poultry farming with improved breed of backyard chicken. Journal of World’s Poultry Science, 3(1): 24 - 27.
Rajkumar, U., Muthukumar, M., Haunshi, S., Niranjan, M., Raju, M.V.L.N., Rama Rao, S.V. and Chatterjee, R.N. (2016). Comparative evaluation of carcass traits and meat quality in native Aseel chicken and commercial broilers. British Poultry Science, 57: 339 – 347.
Rajkumar, U., Haunshi, S., Paswan, C., Raju, M.V.L.N., Rama Rao, S.V. and Chatterjee, R.N. (2017). Characterization of indigenous Aseel chicken breed for morphological, growth, production, and meat composition traits from India. Journal of Poultry Science, 96(7): 2120 - 2126.
Satheeshkumar, S. (2011). Intensive rearing of native chicken for meat in western Tamil Nadu. M. V. Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai.
Siddiky, N.A. (2017). Backyard Poultry Production Systems in SAARC Member States. SAARC Agriculture Centre, Dhaka-1215, Bangladesh, 39 – 58.
Vetrivel, S.C. and Chandrakumarmangalam, S. (2013). The role of poultry industry in Indian economy. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 15(4): 287 – 294.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
All the copy right belongs to the sponsoring Organization, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai - 51.