Estimation of losses in grain yield due to bacterial blight and neck blast of rice in Haryana
298 / 237
Keywords:
Bacterial blight, grain yield, loss, neck blast, riceAbstract
Field experiments were conducted at CCSHAU Rice Research Station, Kaul during kharif 2008 to 2011 to study the effect of time of inoculation of bacterial blight pathogen (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae) and varied levels of incidence and severity of neck blast on grain yield and yield attributes of non-scented and scented rice varieties. Inoculation of bacterial blight pathogen 30 days after transplanting (DAT) resulted in a maximum mean yield loss of 29.88% followed by inoculation at 45 DAT while the losses were minimum when rice varieties were inoculated at 75 DAT. Among the varieties, the overall mean yield loss was maximum in Pusa Basmati-1 (35.76%) followed by CSR 30 and Haryana Shankar Dhan-1 while it was minimum in HKR 47. The maximum yield loss was recorded in Pusa Basmati-1 (45.14%) followed by Haryana Shankar Dhan-1 (31.29%) while it was minimum in HKR 47 (22.62%) when inoculated at 30 DAT. The corresponding losses in grain yield of these cultivars were 22.44, 5.38 and 1.53% when inoculated at 75 DAT. There was a significant increase in per cent chaffy grains (5.47 to 17.53%) with increasing levels of neck blast incidence from 30 to 100% while 1000 grain weight and grain yield of 100 panicles was reduced by 7.52 to 23.88% and 1.77 to 37.52%, respectively as the disease incidence increased from 0 to 100%. With regards to neck blast severity, the chaffy grains increased from 5.00 to 28.48% while 1000 grain weight and grain yield of 100 panicles decreased by 0.73 to 33.81% and 1.49 to 59.80% as the neck blast severity increased from grade 1 (panicles with small lesions without engirdling of the neck region) to grade 3 (completely engirdled panicles), respectively.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
For Authors
As soon as an article is accepted for publication, authors are requested to assign copyright of the article (or to grant exclusive publication and dissemination rights) to the publisher (Indian Phytopathlogical Society). This will ensure the widest possible protection and dissemination of information.
For Readers
While the advice and information in this journal is believed to be true and accurate at the date of its publication, the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
All articles published in this journal are protected by copyright, which covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article (e.g., as offprints), as well as all translation rights. No material published in this journal may be reproduced photographically or stored on microfilm, in electronic data bases, on video disks, etc., without first obtaining written permission from the publisher. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc. in this publication, even if not specifically identified, implies that these names are protected by the relevant laws and regulations.